Almo Nature Daily All Breeds Sterilised with Pork and Rice

Dry Extruded · completeClear label

Daily All Breeds Sterilised with Pork and Rice
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Almo Nature Daily All Breeds Sterilised with Pork and Rice a good dog food?

We score it 32/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with cereals, rice and meat and animal derivatives as the main ingredients.

How we score

67% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 4 poor-graded ingredients make up about 73% of the recipe.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids pork: the label lists dehydrated pork protein
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 26% · Fat 11%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein26%
Fat11%
Fibre3.70%
Ash7.90%
Moisture9%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.21%
Omega-6 fatty acids2.50%
Calcium1.70%
Phosphorus1%

Energy: 353 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

vitamin A (3a672a) 18100 IU/kg; vitamin D3 (3a671) 950 IU/kg; vitamin E (3a700i) 150 mg/kg; vitamin B1 (3a821) 4 mg/kg; vitamin B2 8 mg/kg; vitamin B6 (3a831) 4 mg/kg; vitamin B12 0,06 mg/kg; folic acid (3a316) 0,4 mg/kg; calcium D-pantothenate (3a841) 13,5 mg/kg; biotin (3a880) 0,1 mg/kg; nicotinic acid (3a314) 4 mg/kg; choline chloride (3a890) 1407 mg/kg; copper 8 mg/kg (copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate (3b405) 31,5 mg/kg); iron 20 mg/kg (iron(II) sulphate monohydrate (3b103) 60,82 mg/kg); zinc 119,69 mg/kg (zinc sulphate monohydrate (3b605) 327,94 mg/kg); iode 1,01 mg/kg (3b203 1,55 mg/kg); manganese 10 mg/kg (manganous sulphate monohydrate (3b503) 30,83 mg/kg); selenium 0,1 mg/kg (3b810 45,5 mg/kg); L-carnitine 30 mg/kg

Technological additives

antioxidants

Ingredients (9)67% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 29.4%
  • carb 24.5%
  • oil 17.9%
  • supplement 15.4%
  • other 12.8%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1CerealsCerealscarb · poor-20.5
2rice 4%Rice - whitecarb · medium44.0
321.4% meat and animal derivativesMeat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor21.421.4
4dehydrated pork 8%Dehydrated Pork Proteinmeat · good88.0
5oils and fatsOils and Fatsoil · poor-17.9
6mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-15.4
7derivatives of vegetable origin (inulin from chicory - a source of FOS-0.1%)Vegetable By-Productsother · poor-12.8
8glucosamine 0.01%Glucosaminesupplement · good0.010.01
9chondroitin sulfate 0.01%Chondroitinsupplement · good0.010.01
  1. 1. Cereals20.5% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  2. 2. rice 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
    Rice - white · carb · medium
  3. 3. 21.4% meat and animal derivatives21.4% declared21.4% estimated
  4. 4. dehydrated pork 8%8% declared8.0% estimated
    Dehydrated Pork Protein · meat · good
  5. 5. oils and fats17.9% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor
  6. 6. minerals15.4% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  7. 7. derivatives of vegetable origin (inulin from chicory - a source of FOS-0.1%)12.8% estimated
    Vegetable By-Products · other · poor
  8. 8. glucosamine 0.01%0.01% declared0.01% estimated
    Glucosamine · supplement · good
  9. 9. chondroitin sulfate 0.01%0.01% declared0.01% estimated
    Chondroitin · supplement · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12

Brand and contact: Almo Nature
Almo Nature logo
Phone
+39 010 25 35 400
Address
Piazza dei Giustiniani, 6, 16123 Genova, Italy

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-12
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.almonature.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 2.9/5 · 4 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score came in at 32 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -7 points. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, while lower-quality ingredients brought the score down by -4.7. Finally, the overall quality of the ingredient list adjusted the result by -4.2 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.59.191-4.20
Meat share of dry matter18.2%0.096+1.75
Carb share of dry matter29.4%-0.115-3.39
Oil share of dry matter24.2%-0.092-2.23
Supplement share of dry matter19.3%-0.012-0.24
Other share of dry matter8.7%-0.375-3.28
Recipe graded poor72.6%-0.065-4.72
Poor-quality meat in recipe21.4%-0.179-3.82
Number of poor ingredients4-0.876-3.50
Largest single poor ingredient21.4%0.060+1.28
Undeclared quantities66.6%-0.106-7.03
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Additive penalty-1.710.222-0.38
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.59.191-4.20
Meat share of dry matter18.2%0.096+1.75
Carb share of dry matter29.4%-0.115-3.39
Oil share of dry matter24.2%-0.092-2.23
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter19.3%-0.012-0.24
Other share of dry matter8.7%-0.375-3.28
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor72.6%-0.065-4.72
Poor-quality meat in recipe21.4%-0.179-3.82
Number of poor ingredients4-0.876-3.50
Largest single poor ingredient21.4%0.060+1.28
Undeclared quantities66.6%-0.106-7.03
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-1.710.222-0.38
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
31.9
Final score
32/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v332/100current
v233/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2628.6 (band 18 to 40%)98.8
Fat1112.1 (band 5.5 to 20%)97.3
Fibre3.74.1 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium1.71.9 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus11.1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.71.7 (band 1 to 2%)100
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100
Energy (kcal/100g)353387.9100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 19 nutritional additives on the label
  • vitamin A (3a672a) 18100 IU/kg
  • vitamin D3 (3a671) 950 IU/kg
  • vitamin E (3a700i) 150 mg/kg
  • vitamin B1 (3a821) 4 mg/kg
  • vitamin B2 8 mg/kg
  • vitamin B6 (3a831) 4 mg/kg
  • vitamin B12 0,06 mg/kg
  • folic acid (3a316) 0,4 mg/kg
  • calcium D-pantothenate (3a841) 13,5 mg/kg
  • biotin (3a880) 0,1 mg/kg
  • nicotinic acid (3a314) 4 mg/kg
  • choline chloride (3a890) 1407 mg/kg
  • copper 8 mg/kg (copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate (3b405) 31,5 mg/kg)
  • iron 20 mg/kg (iron(II) sulphate monohydrate (3b103) 60,82 mg/kg)
  • zinc 119,69 mg/kg (zinc sulphate monohydrate (3b605) 327,94 mg/kg)
  • iode 1,01 mg/kg (3b203 1,55 mg/kg)
  • manganese 10 mg/kg (manganous sulphate monohydrate (3b503) 30,83 mg/kg)
  • selenium 0,1 mg/kg (3b810 45,5 mg/kg)
  • L-carnitine 30 mg/kg

High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (33.4% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)6.7/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Daily All Breeds Sterilised with Pork and Rice

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Almo Nature

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.