Our verdict
Is Zenoo Natural & Balanced Duck Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 73/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete freeze-dried food for dogs of all life stages, with duck, liver and salmon as the main ingredients.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 33.7% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 43% · Fat 32%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 43% |
| Fat | 32% |
| Fibre | 5% |
| Ash | 7.50% |
| Moisture | 5% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
No refrigeration needed - perfect for everyday feeding and travel-friendly.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A; Vitamin D3; Vitamin E; Vitamin B1; Vitamin B2; Vitamin B6; Vitamin B12; Niacinamide; Vitamin C; Calcium-D-pantothenate; Folic acid; Biotin; iron; zinc; manganese; copper; iodine; selenium
Technological additives
Rosemary extract natural preservative
Ingredients (10)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 38.7%
- meat 36.8%
- supplement 15.5%
- fibre 9.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fresh duck meat | Duck | meat · medium | - | 12.9 |
| 2 | fresh duck liver | Liver | meat · good | - | 12.3 |
| 3 | fresh salmon | Salmon | meat · good | - | 11.6 |
| 4 | fresh carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 11.0 |
| 5 | fresh pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 10.3 |
| 6 | fresh apples | Apples | veg · good | - | 9.7 |
| 7 | chicory inulin | Inulin | fibre · good | - | 9.0 |
| 8 | yeast products | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 8.4 |
| 9 | rosemary extract | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 7.7 |
| 10 | vitamins and minerals. | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 7.1 |
- 1. Fresh duck meat12.9% estimated
- 2. fresh duck liver12.3% estimated
- 3. fresh salmon11.6% estimated
- 4. fresh carrots11.0% estimated
- 5. fresh pumpkin10.3% estimated
- 6. fresh apples9.7% estimated
- 7. chicory inulin9.0% estimated
- 8. yeast products8.4% estimated
- 9. rosemary extract7.7% estimated
- 10. vitamins and minerals.7.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22
Brand and contact: Zenoo
- Website
- https://myzenoo.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- myzenoo.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 73 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages weighed the score down by -10.6 points. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.6 points, the processing format added +6.6 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete added a further +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.59 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.1% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 37.0% | -0.012 | -0.45 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.11 | 33.786 | +37.50 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | yes | 6.629 | +6.63 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.59 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.1% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 37.0% | -0.012 | -0.45 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.11 | 33.786 | +37.50 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | yes | 6.629 | +6.63 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.06
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 72.7
- Final score
- 73/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 43 | 45.3 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 32 | 33.7 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 5 | 5.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 18 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A
- Vitamin D3
- Vitamin E
- Vitamin B1
- Vitamin B2
- Vitamin B6
- Vitamin B12
- Niacinamide
- Vitamin C
- Calcium-D-pantothenate
- Folic acid
- Biotin
- iron
- zinc
- manganese
- copper
- iodine
- selenium
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "free from grains, GMOs, and artificial additives" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
10 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perfect choice for sensitive dogs (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nutritious and easily digestible protein source (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Prebiotics for healthy digestion and immunity (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| supports healthy weight and is easily digestible (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natural duck fats help maintain healthy weight and energy (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Duck liver provides vitamin A, B12 and iron for vital energy (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Gentle prebiotics support the digestive system (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High-quality proteins from duck and salmon for balanced nutrition (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains 65% duck (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% natural product for your pet's health (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from grains, GMOs, and artificial additives (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Natural & Balanced Duck Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.