Years King Prawn, Giant Squid & Chicken Paella
Fresh Shelf · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Years King Prawn, Giant Squid & Chicken Paella a good dog food?
We score it 80/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete shelf-stable fresh food for dogs of all life stages, with salmon, chicken leg and shrimp as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
We could not match this product's ingredients to our glossary, so suitability flags are unknown rather than clear.
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 12% · Fat 10%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 12% |
| Fat | 10% |
| Fibre | 2.40% |
| Ash | 1.30% |
| Moisture | 66% |
Energy: 72.1 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Keep in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. Once opened, cover and refrigerate, use within 3 days.
Feeding guide
Feed the same amount of calories per day as your normal Years meals states on the label, check in your account area for more details.
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (19)2% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 61.4%
- veg 34.5%
- carb 4.1%
- fibre 0.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salmon 15.5% | Salmon | meat · good | 15.5 | 15.5 |
| 2 | Chicken Leg 12.5% | Chicken Leg | meat · good | 12.5 | 12.5 |
| 3 | King Prawns 11% | Shrimp | meat · good | 11 | 11.0 |
| 4 | Cauliflower Rice 10.9% | Cauliflower | veg · good | 10.9 | 10.9 |
| 5 | Desiccated coconut 9.3% | Coconut | veg · good | 9.3 | 9.3 |
| 6 | Red pepper 8.4% | Red Pepper | veg · good | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| 7 | Giant Squid Tentacles 7.5% | Calamari | meat · good | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 8 | Chicken Heart 7% | Chicken Heart | meat · good | 7 | 7.0 |
| 9 | Chicken Gizzards 6.5% | Chicken Gizzard | meat · good | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 10 | Tapioca Starch 4% | Tapioca Starch | carb · medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 11 | Spinach 2% | Spinach | veg · good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 12 | Piquillo Peppers 2% | Red Pepper | veg · good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 13 | Turmeric 1% | Turmeric | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 14 | Alfalfa powder 0.05% | Alfalfa Powder | fibre · medium | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 15 | Nettle Powder 0.05% | Nettles | veg · good | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 16 | Kelp Powder 0.03% | Kelp | veg · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 17 | Chicory Root Powder 0.03% | Chicory root | veg · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 18 | Dandelion powder 0.02% | Dandelion Root | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 19 | Chamomile Powder 0.01% | Chamomile | veg · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
- 1. Salmon 15.5%15.5% declared15.5% estimated
- 2. Chicken Leg 12.5%12.5% declared12.5% estimated
- 3. King Prawns 11%11% declared11.0% estimated
- 4. Cauliflower Rice 10.9%10.9% declared10.9% estimated
- 5. Desiccated coconut 9.3%9.3% declared9.3% estimated
- 6. Red pepper 8.4%8.4% declared8.4% estimated
- 7. Giant Squid Tentacles 7.5%7.5% declared7.5% estimated
- 8. Chicken Heart 7%7% declared7.0% estimated
- 9. Chicken Gizzards 6.5%6.5% declared6.5% estimated
- 10. Tapioca Starch 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
- 11. Spinach 2%2% declared2.0% estimated
- 12. Piquillo Peppers 2%2% declared2.0% estimated
- 13. Turmeric 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
- 14. Alfalfa powder 0.05%0.05% declared0.05% estimated
- 15. Nettle Powder 0.05%0.05% declared0.05% estimated
- 16. Kelp Powder 0.03%0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 17. Chicory Root Powder 0.03%0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 18. Dandelion powder 0.02%0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 19. Chamomile Powder 0.01%0.01% declared0.01% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-11-05
Brand and contact: Years
- Website
- https://www.years.com/
- Phone
- 07380337761
- Contact page
- www.years.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-11-05
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- shop.years.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The recipe score is 80. Overall ingredient quality contributed +9. Meat content contributed +6.8. Processing format contributed -0.7. Carbohydrate content contributed -0.5.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-11-05. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 1.0 | 9.191 | +8.99 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 70.7% | 0.096 | +6.79 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.115 | -0.48 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 24.9% | -0.005 | -0.13 |
| Undeclared quantities | 2.2% | -0.106 | -0.23 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 1.0 | 9.191 | +8.99 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 70.7% | 0.096 | +6.79 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.115 | -0.48 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 24.9% | -0.005 | -0.13 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 2.2% | -0.106 | -0.23 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Subtotal
- 79.6
- Final score
- 80/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12 | 35.3 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 10 | 29.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.4 | 7.1 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 72.1 | 212.1 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (97.8% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 19.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Nutritionally complete" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "100% complete" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luxury ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hand crafted (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nutritionally complete (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Over 60% prime cuts of meat (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Always fresh (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% complete (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| with everything you would expect from a Years meal (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| superfood antioxidants (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.