Years Healthy Teeth & Happy Joints Dental Bars

Treat · complementaryHigh meatClear label

Healthy Teeth & Happy Joints Dental Bars
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is Years Healthy Teeth & Happy Joints Dental Bars a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

Complementary extruded dry treats for dogs of all life stages, with beef skin, duck and green as the main ingredients.

How we score

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 96% of the dry matter (99% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Prints a percentage for nearly every ingredient, so the recipe is fully auditable.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef skin
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
  • Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 4 ingredients.
  • Names its animal sources (1 named ingredient).
  • Uses generic terms (Duck): the specific animal source is not stated.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints quantities for 2 ingredients.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 60% · Fat 12%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein60%
Fat12%
Fibre1.20%
Ash7.50%
Moisture10%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

120g resealable pouch

Feeding guide

Suitable for dogs 12 weeks and older

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (4)1% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 98.6%
  • supplement 1.4%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Beef head skin 83.6%Beef Skinmeat · good83.683.6
2Duck 15%Duckmeat · medium1515.0
3Green-Lipped Mussel ExtractGreen-Lipped Musselsupplement · good-0.8
4GlucosamineGlucosaminesupplement · good-0.6
  1. 1. Beef head skin 83.6%83.6% declared83.6% estimated
    Beef Skin · meat · good
  2. 2. Duck 15%15% declared15.0% estimated
    Duck · meat · medium
  3. 3. Green-Lipped Mussel Extract0.8% estimated
    Green-Lipped Mussel · supplement · good
  4. 4. Glucosamine0.6% estimated
    Glucosamine · supplement · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-11-05

Brand and contact: Years
Years logo
Phone
07380337761
Contact page
www.years.com

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-11-05
Product page
shop.years.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-11-05. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.99.191+8.52
Meat share of dry matter95.5%0.096+9.17
Supplement share of dry matter4.5%-0.012-0.05
Undeclared quantities1.4%-0.106-0.15
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.99.191+8.52
Meat share of dry matter95.5%0.096+9.17
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.115+0.00
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter4.5%-0.012-0.05
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities1.4%-0.106-0.15
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Subtotal
75.5
Final score
76/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v376/100current
v275/100
v170/100
v1.970/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (98.6% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)19.7/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · strong — 3 checkable claims: 3 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "100% Grain Free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "packed with protein" — supported by the declared high protein data.
  • "100% natural ingredients - no fillers, grains or additives" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Healthy Teeth & Happy Joints (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Made from Natural Ingredients (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
2-in-1 Dental & Joint Support (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
100% Grain Free (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Made with 100% beef and duck (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
packed with protein (on page)High/low levelconsistentManufacturer assertion
100% natural ingredients - no fillers, grains or additives (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Rich in natural collagen (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
helps reduce plaque (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
support your dog’s dental and joint health (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
supporting mobility and easing stiffness in ageing or active dogs (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from Years

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.