Our verdict
Is Yarrah Organic Chicken & Duck Dog Pâté a good dog food?
We score it 70/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet paté food for dogs of all life stages, with carcass, chicken and chicken heart as the main ingredients.
43% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken carcass
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 42.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9% · Fat 8.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9% |
| Fat | 8.50% |
| Fibre | 0.40% |
| Ash | 2% |
| Moisture | 80% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
MENU Feeding advice Daily recommended quantities: 3 kg ±300 g | 7 kg ±525 g | 12 kg ±750 g | 20 kg ±1,050 g. Dog - Can chicken Skip product gallery Dog - Can chicken Organic Adult dry dog food with chicken
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin D3 75 IU; Vitamin E 100 mg; Biotin 100 µg; Zinc 15 mg; Manganese 6.0 mg; Copper 1.0 mg; Iodine 0.3 mg
Ingredients (8)43% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 57.0%
- supplement 43.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.5% carcass | Chicken Carcass | meat · good | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| 2 | 9.5% meat | Chicken | meat · medium | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| 3 | 9.5% heart | Chicken Heart | meat · good | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| 4 | 9.5% kidney | Kidney | meat · good | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| 5 | 5% liver | Chicken Liver | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 6 | 14% duck | Duck | meat · medium | 14 | 14.0 |
| 7 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 42.9 |
| 8 | 0.1% dried seaweed | Dried Sea Algae | supplement · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
- 1. 9.5% carcass9.5% declared9.5% estimated
- 2. 9.5% meat9.5% declared9.5% estimated
- 3. 9.5% heart9.5% declared9.5% estimated
- 4. 9.5% kidney9.5% declared9.5% estimated
- 5. 5% liver5% declared5.0% estimated
- 6. 14% duck14% declared14.0% estimated
- 7. minerals42.9% estimated
- 8. 0.1% dried seaweed0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Yarrah
- Website
- https://www.yarrah.com/en
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.yarrah.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
We scored this food 70 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.2 points. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -4.5, the meat content contributed +2.8, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.16 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 28.7% | 0.096 | +2.76 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 71.3% | -0.012 | -0.87 |
| Undeclared quantities | 42.9% | -0.106 | -4.53 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.16 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 28.7% | 0.096 | +2.76 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 71.3% | -0.012 | -0.87 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 42.9% | -0.106 | -4.53 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 69.8
- Final score
- 70/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9 | 45 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 8.5 | 42.5 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.4 | 2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 90 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 7 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin D3 75 IU
- Vitamin E 100 mg
- Biotin 100 µg
- Zinc 15 mg
- Manganese 6.0 mg
- Copper 1.0 mg
- Iodine 0.3 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (57.1% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 11.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Delicious grain-free pâté" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Grain-free recipe." — supported by the declared grain-free data.
21 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| complete, nutritious (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| suitable for dogs of all ages (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Good for animals and planet (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Crafted with the finest organic ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| rich in delightful organic duck (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| filled with organic chicken and duck (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Organic dog food pâté with chicken and duck (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| enhanced with seaweed (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| a source of high-quality protein (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Delicious grain-free pâté (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| omega-3 fatty acids (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Organic; pure and healthy (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| * = organic. (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain-free recipe. (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 43% chicken* (carcass*, meat*, heart*, kidney*, liver*) (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 14% duck* (meat*) (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Crude protein 9.0% (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Crude fat 8.5% (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 0.1% dried seaweed* (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Moisture 80% (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Crude fibre 0.4% (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Great taste. Best ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Crude ash 2.0% (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Organic Chicken & Duck Dog Pâté
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.