Wolf of Wilderness Mono-Protein Rough Storms - Duck
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Wolf of Wilderness Mono-Protein Rough Storms - Duck a good dog food?
We score it 63/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
35% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 26.50% · Fat 15%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 26.50% |
| Fat | 15% |
| Fibre | 2.70% |
| Ash | 7.90% |
| Calcium | 1.50% |
| Phosphorus | 1.10% |
Energy: 378.5 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Wolf of Wilderness Mono-Protein "Rough Storms" - Duck is a complete food for adult dogs. See table on page for daily servings by weight and activity level (e.g. 1kg dog: 25-35g/day; 10kg: 140-195g/day; 80kg: 670-920g/day). Feed as dry food, split into two meals; fresh water always available.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 12000 IU; vitamin D3 1500 IU; vitamin E 250 IU; vitamin C 100 mg; vitamin B1 12 mg; vitamin B2 (riboflavin) 12 mg; vitamin B6 8 mg; vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 180 mcg; niacin 35 mg; calcium D-pantothenate 35 mg; folic acid 1.2 mg; biotin 300 mcg; choline chloride 2500 mg; copper (as copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate) 12.5 mg; zinc (as zinc sulphate monohydrate) 100 mg; zinc (as zinc chelate of glycine hydrate) 60 mg; iron (as iron (II) sulphate monohydrate) 200 mg; manganese (as manganous sulphate monohydrate) 25 mg; iodine (as calcium iodate anhydrous) 2.3 mg; selenium (as sodium selenite) 0.35 mg
Technological additives
Antioxidants
Ingredients (24)35% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 58.2%
- carb 8.9%
- supplement 8.4%
- veg 7.6%
- oil 5.6%
- other 4.1%
- fibre 4.0%
- additive 3.0%
- fruit 0.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fresh Duck Meat (40%) | Duck | meat · medium | 40 | 40.0 |
| 2 | Dried Duck Protein (18%) | Dried Duck Protein | meat · good | 18 | 18.0 |
| 3 | Potato Flakes | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 4.6 |
| 4 | Potato Starch | Potato starch | carb · poor | - | 4.3 |
| 5 | Dried Lucerne (4%) | Alfalfa | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 6 | Protein Hydrolysate (from Yeast) | Protein Hydrolysate | other · poor | - | 4.1 |
| 7 | Dried Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 8 | Salmon Oil (2%) | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 9 | Sunflower Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 3.6 |
| 10 | Linseeds | Linseed | veg · good | - | 3.4 |
| 11 | Dried Brewers' Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 12 | Sodium Chloride | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.0 |
| 13 | Dried Yeast Cell Walls | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 14 | Beta-Glucans and Mannan-Oligosaccharides | Beta-Glucans | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 15 | Egg Powder (0.2%) | Dried Whole Egg | meat · good | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 16 | 0.1% Currants | Currant | veg · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 17 | 0.1% Aronia Berries | Aronia Berries | veg · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 18 | 0.03% Common Yarrow | Yarrow | veg · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 19 | 0.03% Dandelion Root | Dandelion Root | veg · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 20 | 0.03% Camomile | Chamomile | veg · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 21 | 0.03% Nettle Leaves | Nettles | veg · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 22 | 0.03% Ribwort | Ribwort | veg · good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 23 | 0.03% St John's Wort | St. John's Wort | veg · medium | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 24 | Chicory Inulin (0.1%) | Inulin | fibre · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
- 1. Fresh Duck Meat (40%)40% declared40.0% estimated
- 2. Dried Duck Protein (18%)18% declared18.0% estimated
- 3. Potato Flakes4.6% estimated
- 4. Potato Starch4.3% estimated
- 5. Dried Lucerne (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 6. Protein Hydrolysate (from Yeast)4.1% estimated
- 7. Dried Beet Pulp3.9% estimated
- 8. Salmon Oil (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
- 9. Sunflower Oil3.6% estimated
- 10. Linseeds3.4% estimated
- 11. Dried Brewers' Yeast3.2% estimated
- 12. Sodium Chloride3.0% estimated
- 13. Dried Yeast Cell Walls2.7% estimated
- 14. Beta-Glucans and Mannan-Oligosaccharides2.5% estimated
- 15. Egg Powder (0.2%)0.2% declared0.2% estimated
- 16. 0.1% Currants0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 17. 0.1% Aronia Berries0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 18. 0.03% Common Yarrow0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 19. 0.03% Dandelion Root0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 20. 0.03% Camomile0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 21. 0.03% Nettle Leaves0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 22. 0.03% Ribwort0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 23. 0.03% St John's Wort0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 24. Chicory Inulin (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Wolf of Wilderness
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.zooplus.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
84 reviews on this product · 4.5/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 63 out of 100. The meat content contributed +4.6, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.8. On the other hand, the processing format adjusted the score by -6.7. Finally, ingredients without printed percentages contributed -3.7 to the final calculation.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.83 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 47.6% | 0.096 | +4.57 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.8% | -0.115 | -0.43 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.5% | -0.092 | -0.88 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 11.7% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.5% | 0.163 | +0.74 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 13.2% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.5% | -0.375 | -1.31 |
| Recipe graded poor | 11.4% | -0.065 | -0.74 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.3% | 0.060 | +0.26 |
| Undeclared quantities | 35.3% | -0.106 | -3.73 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -3.61 | 0.222 | -0.80 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.83 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 47.6% | 0.096 | +4.57 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.8% | -0.115 | -0.43 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.5% | -0.092 | -0.88 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 11.7% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.5% | 0.163 | +0.74 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 13.2% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.5% | -0.375 | -1.31 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 11.4% | -0.065 | -0.74 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.3% | 0.060 | +0.26 |
| Undeclared quantities | 35.3% | -0.106 | -3.73 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -3.61 | 0.222 | -0.80 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 63.0
- Final score
- 63/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26.5 | 29.3 (band 18.82044198895028 to 40%) | 99.6 |
| Fat | 15 | 16.6 (band 5.750690607734808 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.7 | 3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.5 | 1.7 (band 0.5227900552486189 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.1 | 1.2 (band 0.41823204419889515 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 91.8 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 378.5 | 418.2 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 20 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 12000 IU
- vitamin D3 1500 IU
- vitamin E 250 IU
- vitamin C 100 mg
- vitamin B1 12 mg
- vitamin B2 (riboflavin) 12 mg
- vitamin B6 8 mg
- vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 180 mcg
- niacin 35 mg
- calcium D-pantothenate 35 mg
- folic acid 1.2 mg
- biotin 300 mcg
- choline chloride 2500 mg
- copper (as copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate) 12.5 mg
- zinc (as zinc sulphate monohydrate) 100 mg
- zinc (as zinc chelate of glycine hydrate) 60 mg
- iron (as iron (II) sulphate monohydrate) 200 mg
- manganese (as manganous sulphate monohydrate) 25 mg
- iodine (as calcium iodate anhydrous) 2.3 mg
- selenium (as sodium selenite) 0.35 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (64.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 12.9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
25/100 · limited — 4 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 3 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Mono-protein grain-free complete dry dog food" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
- "Mono-protein: also suitable for sensitive dogs" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
- "High-quality protein: meat and animal protein exclusively from duck, 40% of which is fresh muscle meat" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "100% grain-free recipe: also suitable for dogs with grain sensitivities" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digestion support: blend of functional fibres (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| With fresh duck meat, lucerne and berries (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Responsible premium quality: produced in a family business in Germany, with recyclable packaging (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Refined with forest berries, roots, and wild herbs, with fibre-rich lucerne (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% grain-free recipe: also suitable for dogs with grain sensitivities (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mono-protein grain-free complete dry dog food (on pack) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Inspired by the wild wolf's natural diet (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Mono-protein: also suitable for sensitive dogs (on pack) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Intestinal balance and natural immune defenses support: beta-glucans and MOS (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Maintenance of optimal body weight and stable metabolism: moderate energy and fat content (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High-quality protein: meat and animal protein exclusively from duck, 40% of which is fresh muscle meat (on pack) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| no artificial preservatives, colour or taste enhancers (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Mono-Protein Rough Storms - Duck
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.