Winner Lamb Sensitive Dog Food

Dry Extruded · complete

Lamb Sensitive Dog Food
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Winner Lamb Sensitive Dog Food a good dog food?

We score it 46/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with maize, meat meal and rice as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry fat
  • Your dog avoids beef: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry fat
  • Your dog avoids lamb: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists maize / corn
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 23% · Fat 10%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein23%
Fat10%
Fibre2.40%
Ash8%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

1kg-5kg: 35g-105g; 5kg-10kg: 105g-165g; 10kg-15kg: 165g-230g; 15kg-20kg: 230g-275g; 20kg-25kg: 275g-320g; 25kg-30kg: 320g-365g; 30kg-35kg: 365g-430g; 35kg-40kg: 430g-480g; 40kg-45kg: 480g-520g; 45kg-50kg: 520g-560g; 50kg-55kg: 560g-600g; 55kg-60kg: 600g-640g. Puppies up to 6 months: at least 3 feeds/day; 6-12 months: 2 feeds/day. Adjust for overweight dogs. Can be served wet or dry (1 part water to 2 parts feed).

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

E672 Vitamin A 19,500 IU/kg; E671 Vitamin D3 2,000 IU/kg; Alpha Tocopherol Acetate (Vitamin E) 50 IU/kg; E4 Copper (Copper Sulphate) 15 mg/kg; E8 Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.1 mg/kg; E1 Iron (Iron Sulphate) 100 mg/kg; E5 Manganese (Manganese Oxide) 40 mg/kg; E6 Zinc (Zinc Oxide) 100 mg/kg; E2 Iodine (Calcium Iodate) 1.5 mg/kg

Technological additives

Antioxidants; Preservatives

Ingredients (12)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 28.8%
  • meat 27.5%
  • fibre 13.5%
  • oil 9.0%
  • veg 8.1%
  • supplement 6.8%
  • additive 6.3%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1MaizeMaize / Corncarb · medium-10.8
2Dehydrated LambMeat Mealmeat · medium-10.4
3Dehydrated BeefMeat Mealmeat · medium-9.9
4RiceRice - whitecarb · medium-9.5
5Poultry FatPoultry Fatoil · medium-9.0
6Dehulled OatsOatscarb · medium-8.6
7Whole LinseedLinseedveg · good-8.1
8Beet PulpBeet Pulpfibre · medium-7.7
9DigestDigestmeat · poor-7.2
10MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-6.8
11Yeast ExtractHydrolysed Yeastadditive · medium-6.3
12Chicory ExtractChicory Root Extractfibre · good-5.9
  1. 1. Maize10.8% estimated
    Maize / Corn · carb · medium
  2. 2. Dehydrated Lamb10.4% estimated
    Meat Meal · meat · medium
  3. 3. Dehydrated Beef9.9% estimated
    Meat Meal · meat · medium
  4. 4. Rice9.5% estimated
    Rice - white · carb · medium
  5. 5. Poultry Fat9.0% estimated
    Poultry Fat · oil · medium
  6. 6. Dehulled Oats8.6% estimated
    Oats · carb · medium
  7. 7. Whole Linseed8.1% estimated
    Linseed · veg · good
  8. 8. Beet Pulp7.7% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  9. 9. Digest7.2% estimated
    Digest · meat · poor
  10. 10. Minerals6.8% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  11. 11. Yeast Extract6.3% estimated
    Hydrolysed Yeast · additive · medium
  12. 12. Chicory Extract5.9% estimated
    Chicory Root Extract · fibre · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Winner
Winner logo
Phone
+1234567890
Address
1, My Address, My Street, New York City, NY, USA
Contact page
www.winnerplus.eu

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 4.8/5 · 121 reviews

6 reviews on this product · 4.8/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves a final score of 46 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.9 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6. Additionally, the processing format deducted -6.7 and the carbohydrate content contributed -3.4.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+4.94
Carb share of dry matter29.4%-0.115-3.38
Oil share of dry matter10.3%-0.092-0.95
Vegetable share of dry matter8.5%-0.005-0.04
Additive share of dry matter6.6%0.163+1.07
Supplement share of dry matter7.2%-0.012-0.09
Recipe graded poor7.2%-0.065-0.47
Poor-quality meat in recipe7.2%-0.179-1.29
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient7.2%0.060+0.43
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-7.570.222-1.68
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+4.94
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter29.4%-0.115-3.38
Oil share of dry matter10.3%-0.092-0.95
Vegetable share of dry matter8.5%-0.005-0.04
Additive share of dry matter6.6%0.163+1.07
Supplement share of dry matter7.2%-0.012-0.09
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor7.2%-0.065-0.47
Poor-quality meat in recipe7.2%-0.179-1.29
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient7.2%0.060+0.43
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-7.570.222-1.68
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
45.6
Final score
46/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v346/100current
v247/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2325.4 (band 18 to 40%)90.2
Fat1011 (band 5.5 to 20%)93
Fibre2.42.7 (band 0.5 to 5%)98.7

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • E672 Vitamin A 19,500 IU/kg
  • E671 Vitamin D3 2,000 IU/kg
  • Alpha Tocopherol Acetate (Vitamin E) 50 IU/kg
  • E4 Copper (Copper Sulphate) 15 mg/kg
  • E8 Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.1 mg/kg
  • E1 Iron (Iron Sulphate) 100 mg/kg
  • E5 Manganese (Manganese Oxide) 40 mg/kg
  • E6 Zinc (Zinc Oxide) 100 mg/kg
  • E2 Iodine (Calcium Iodate) 1.5 mg/kg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Complete, nutritionally balanced dog food" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.

6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Prebiotics for a healthy gut (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Omegas 3 & 6 for healthy skin and coat (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No artificial colours or flavours (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Free from artificial colours, flavours and wheat gluten (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Hypoallergenic formula with lamb (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Complete dog food with 32% meat (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Complete, nutritionally balanced dog food (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Lamb Sensitive Dog Food

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Winner

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.