Winner Energy

Dry Extruded · completeHigh meat

Energy
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Winner Energy a good dog food?

We score it 48/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete extruded dry food for dogs of all life stages, with maize, meat meal and dried chicken protein as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 31% of the dry matter (40% as fed).
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Doesn't list lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
  • Your dog avoids beef: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists maize / corn
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 28% · Fat 12%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein28%
Fat12%
Fibre2.20%
Ash9.50%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

Body weight Daily feed: 1kg - 5kg 35g - 105g; 5kg - 10kg 105g - 165g; 10kg - 15kg 165g - 230g; 15kg - 20kg 230g - 275g; 20kg - 25kg 275g - 320g; 25kg - 30kg 320g - 365g; 30kg - 35kg 365g - 430g; 35kg - 40kg 430g - 480g; 40kg - 45kg 480g - 520g; 45kg - 50kg 520g - 560g; 50kg - 55kg 560g - 600g; 55kg - 60kg 600g - 640g.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

E672 Vitamin A 19,500iu/kg; E671 Vitamin D3 2,000iu/kg; Alpha Tocopherol Acetate (Vitamin E) 50iu/kg; E4 Copper (Copper Sulphate) 15mg/kg; E8 Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.1mg/kg; E1 Iron (Iron Sulphate) 100mg/kg; E5 Manganese (Manganese Oxide) 40mg/kg; E6 Zinc (Zinc Oxide) 100mg/kg; E2 Iodine (Calcium Iodate) 1.5mg/kg

Technological additives

Antioxidants; Preservatives

Ingredients (11)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 39.6%
  • fibre 15.0%
  • carb 11.8%
  • oil 9.6%
  • veg 9.1%
  • supplement 8.0%
  • additive 7.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1MaizeMaize / Corncarb · medium-11.8
2Dehydrated BeefMeat Mealmeat · medium-11.2
3Dehydrated ChickenDried chicken proteinmeat · good-10.7
4PoultryPoultrymeat · medium-10.2
5FatCrude Fatoil · medium-9.6
6Whole LinseedLinseedveg · good-9.1
7Beet PulpBeet Pulpfibre · medium-8.6
8MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-8.0
9Chicken DigestDigestmeat · poor-7.5
10Yeast ExtractHydrolysed Yeastadditive · medium-7.0
11Chicory Extract.Chicory Root Extractfibre · good-6.4
  1. 1. Maize11.8% estimated
    Maize / Corn · carb · medium
  2. 2. Dehydrated Beef11.2% estimated
    Meat Meal · meat · medium
  3. 3. Dehydrated Chicken10.7% estimated
    Dried chicken protein · meat · good
  4. 4. Poultry10.2% estimated
    Poultry · meat · medium
  5. 5. Fat9.6% estimated
    Crude Fat · oil · medium
  6. 6. Whole Linseed9.1% estimated
    Linseed · veg · good
  7. 7. Beet Pulp8.6% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  8. 8. Minerals8.0% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  9. 9. Chicken Digest7.5% estimated
    Digest · meat · poor
  10. 10. Yeast Extract7.0% estimated
    Hydrolysed Yeast · additive · medium
  11. 11. Chicory Extract.6.4% estimated
    Chicory Root Extract · fibre · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Winner
Winner logo
Phone
+1234567890
Address
1, My Address, My Street, New York City, NY, USA
Contact page
www.winnerplus.eu

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 4.8/5 · 121 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall rating of 48 out of 100. The inclusion of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points, and the processing format adjusted the score by -6.7. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.4 points, while being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points to the final evaluation.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.37
Carb share of dry matter12.9%-0.115-1.48
Oil share of dry matter11.9%-0.092-1.09
Vegetable share of dry matter10.2%-0.005-0.05
Additive share of dry matter7.8%0.163+1.27
Supplement share of dry matter9.2%-0.012-0.11
Recipe graded poor7.5%-0.065-0.49
Poor-quality meat in recipe7.5%-0.179-1.34
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient7.5%0.060+0.45
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-8.340.222-1.85
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.37
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter12.9%-0.115-1.48
Oil share of dry matter11.9%-0.092-1.09
Vegetable share of dry matter10.2%-0.005-0.05
Additive share of dry matter7.8%0.163+1.27
Supplement share of dry matter9.2%-0.012-0.11
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor7.5%-0.065-0.49
Poor-quality meat in recipe7.5%-0.179-1.34
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient7.5%0.060+0.45
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-8.340.222-1.85
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
47.7
Final score
48/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v348/100current
v250/100
v143/100
v1.944/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2830.9 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat1213.3 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre2.22.4 (band 0.5 to 5%)95.7

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • E672 Vitamin A 19,500iu/kg
  • E671 Vitamin D3 2,000iu/kg
  • Alpha Tocopherol Acetate (Vitamin E) 50iu/kg
  • E4 Copper (Copper Sulphate) 15mg/kg
  • E8 Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.1mg/kg
  • E1 Iron (Iron Sulphate) 100mg/kg
  • E5 Manganese (Manganese Oxide) 40mg/kg
  • E6 Zinc (Zinc Oxide) 100mg/kg
  • E2 Iodine (Calcium Iodate) 1.5mg/kg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "Wheat gluten free" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.

6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Ideal for very active dogs or rescue dogs in need of conditioning (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Prebiotics for a healthy gut (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Omegas 3 & 6 for healthy skin and coat (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Rich in tasty Beef (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
40% meat content (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No artificial colours or flavours (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Wheat gluten free (on page)Free-fromcontradictedManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Energy

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Winner

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.