Wildways Fresh Duck with Chicken Wet
Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Wildways Fresh Duck with Chicken Wet a good dog food?
We score it 77/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet food in chunks for puppies, with duck, chicken and blackberries as the main ingredients.
Declared analysis sits below the FEDIAF minimum for calcium, calcium:phosphorus ratio.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9.50% · Fat 4%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9.50% |
| Fat | 4% |
| Fibre | 0.90% |
| Ash | 2% |
| Moisture | 78% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 1% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 1% |
| Calcium | 0.20% |
| Phosphorus | 0.25% |
Energy: 91 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Resealable packaging for lasting freshness
Feeding guide
Daily feeding guide shown by expected adult weight and age in months (cans per day), e.g. Up to 5kg: 2-6 months ½–1½ cans, 6-9 months ½–1 can; 5-12kg: 2-6 months 2-3 cans, 6-12 months 1½-2 cans; 12-25kg: 2-6 months 4-5 cans, 6-12 months 3-4 cans; 25-45kg: 2-6 months 6½–8 cans, 6-12 months 5–6½ cans, 12-15 months 4–6 cans; 45-70kg: 2-6 months 10–11½ cans, 6-12 months 8–9 cans, 12-18 months 6–7½ cans. Introduce gradually over 7-10 days. Divide total into 3-4 meals/day for first 6 months, then 2 meals/day.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin D3 190 IU; Vitamin E 164 IU; Biotin 0.4 mg
Ingredients (9)23% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 88.5%
- veg 5.2%
- carb 3.9%
- fibre 1.3%
- oil 0.7%
- supplement 0.4%
- herb 0.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fresh Duck (48%) | Duck | meat · medium | 48 | 48.0 |
| 2 | Chicken (18%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 18 | 18.0 |
| 3 | Blackberries (4%) | Blackberries | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 4 | Pea Flour (3%) | Pea flour | carb · medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 5 | Hydrolysed Animal Protein (2%) | Hydrolysed Animal Protein | meat · medium | 2 | 2.0 |
| 6 | Lignocellulose (1%) | Lignocellulose | fibre · medium | 1 | 1.0 |
| 7 | Salmon Oil (0.5%) | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 8 | Calcium Carbonate (0.3%) | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 9 | Dried Rosemary (0.01%) | Rosemary Leaves | herb · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
- 1. Fresh Duck (48%)48% declared48.0% estimated
- 2. Chicken (18%)18% declared18.0% estimated
- 3. Blackberries (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 4. Pea Flour (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
- 5. Hydrolysed Animal Protein (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
- 6. Lignocellulose (1%)1% declared1.0% estimated
- 7. Salmon Oil (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 8. Calcium Carbonate (0.3%)0.3% declared0.3% estimated
- 9. Dried Rosemary (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13
Brand and contact: Wildways
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.petsathome.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 77 out of 100. The meat content contributed +7.7 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added a further +4.8 points. On the other hand, ingredients without printed percentages cost the product -2.4 points. Finally, being labelled nutritionally complete lifted the score by +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.80 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 80.3% | 0.096 | +7.71 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.7% | -0.115 | -1.23 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.0% | -0.092 | -0.18 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 1.1% | -0.012 | -0.01 |
| Undeclared quantities | 23.2% | -0.106 | -2.45 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.80 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 80.3% | 0.096 | +7.71 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.7% | -0.115 | -1.23 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.0% | -0.092 | -0.18 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 1.1% | -0.012 | -0.01 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 23.2% | -0.106 | -2.45 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 76.6
- Final score
- 77/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9.5 | 43.2 | 100 |
| Fat | 4 | 18.2 | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.2 | 0.9 | 61.5 |
| Phosphorus | 0.25 | 1.1 | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 0.8 | 0.8 | 56 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 91 | 413.6 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100, omega-3 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 3 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin D3 190 IU
- Vitamin E 164 IU
- Biotin 0.4 mg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (76.8% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 15.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Grain free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provide your puppy with the natural goodness of poultry and a highly palatable source of protein to support healthy growth (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Highly digestible (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added vitamins & minerals (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High meat content (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No added artificial flavours, colours or preservatives (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain free (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Trusted sources (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No artificial flavours (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Fresh Duck with Chicken Wet
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.