Wild Pet Food Bug Bakes Insect Cold-Pressed
Dry Cold Pressed · completeClear labelFull label
Our verdict
Is Wild Pet Food Bug Bakes Insect Cold-Pressed a good dog food?
We score it 60/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete cold-pressed dry food for adult dogs, with insect protein, barley and oats as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: insect
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists barley
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 25% · Fat 11%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 25% |
| Fat | 11% |
| Fibre | 5% |
| Ash | 7% |
| Moisture | 7% |
Energy: 354 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Glucosamine 400mg/kg; Chondroitin 200mg/kg
Ingredients (15)15 of 15 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- carb 40.0%
- meat 28.0%
- veg 13.0%
- fibre 5.3%
- oil 5.0%
- supplement 4.8%
- other 4.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Insect Protein 28% | Insect Protein | meat · good | 28 | 28.0 |
| 2 | Barley 27% | Barley | carb · medium | 27 | 27.0 |
| 3 | Oats 13% | Oats | carb · medium | 13 | 13.0 |
| 4 | Insect Oil 5% | Insect Oil | oil · medium | 5 | 5.0 |
| 5 | 1.25% vitamins | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 1.25 | 1.3 |
| 6 | 1.25% minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 1.25 | 1.3 |
| 7 | 1.25% blueberry chicory root extract | Chicory Root Extract | fibre · good | 1.25 | 1.3 |
| 8 | 1.25% prebiotic MOS | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | 1.25 | 1.3 |
| 9 | Apple 4% | Apples | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 10 | Carrot 4% | Carrots | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 11 | Linseed 4% | Linseed | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 12 | Beet Pulp 4% | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 13 | Vegetable Gravy 4% | Vegetable Gravy | other · medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 14 | Brewer's Yeast 1% | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 15 | Seaweed 1% | Seaweed | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
- 1. Insect Protein 28%28% declared28.0% estimated
- 2. Barley 27%27% declared27.0% estimated
- 3. Oats 13%13% declared13.0% estimated
- 4. Insect Oil 5%5% declared5.0% estimated
- 5. 1.25% vitamins1.25% declared1.3% estimated
- 6. 1.25% minerals1.25% declared1.3% estimated
- 7. 1.25% blueberry chicory root extract1.25% declared1.3% estimated
- 8. 1.25% prebiotic MOS1.25% declared1.3% estimated
- 9. Apple 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
- 10. Carrot 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
- 11. Linseed 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
- 12. Beet Pulp 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
- 13. Vegetable Gravy 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
- 14. Brewer's Yeast 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
- 15. Seaweed 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-09
Brand and contact: Wild Pet Food
- Website
- https://wildpetfood.co.uk/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 07401083953
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-09
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- wildpetfood.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
2 reviews on this product · 4.8/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 60 out of 100. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, and the carbohydrate content contributed -6.4 points, both pulling the score down. On the positive side, the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.8 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.82 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 12.4% | 0.096 | +1.19 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 55.9% | -0.115 | -6.43 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.9% | -0.092 | -0.72 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.0% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 6.9% | -0.012 | -0.08 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.375 | -0.12 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.82 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 12.4% | 0.096 | +1.19 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 55.9% | -0.115 | -6.43 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.9% | -0.092 | -0.72 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.0% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 6.9% | -0.012 | -0.08 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.375 | -0.12 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 59.7
- Final score
- 60/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25 | 26.9 (band 18 to 40%) | 94.2 |
| Fat | 11 | 11.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 96.2 |
| Fibre | 5 | 5.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 354 | 380.6 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 2 nutritional additives on the label
- Glucosamine 400mg/kg
- Chondroitin 200mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novel protein source that can help support dogs with food sensitivities (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with one primary, novel protein source to help simplify your dog's diet (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Highly digestible novel protein included to help with sensitivities (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Provides natural fibre to support healthy digestion and stool quality (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps support beneficial gut bacteria and a healthy gut microbiome (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natural source of healthy fats to support skin hydration and coat condition (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rich in omega-3 fatty acids to support healthy skin and coat shine (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natural source of B vitamins to support skin health and overall wellbeing (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Bug Bakes Insect Cold-Pressed
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.