Wellness CORE Small Breed Savoury Medleys Flavoured with Roasted Chicken, Beef, Green Beans & Red Peppers

Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label

Small Breed Savoury Medleys Flavoured with Roasted Chicken, Beef, Green Beans & Red Peppers
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Wellness CORE Small Breed Savoury Medleys Flavoured with Roasted Chicken, Beef, Green Beans & Red Peppers a good dog food?

We score it 72/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete wet food in chunks for adult dogs, with chicken, chicken broth and beef as the main ingredients.

How we score

42% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 69% of the dry matter (78% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.

Why you might not

  • High in fat: 38% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
  • Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
  • You are limiting fat: 38.1% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 8% · Fat 8%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein8%
Fat8%
Fibre0.50%
Ash5%
Moisture79%

Energy: 83 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

FED ALONE: 2 containers per 1.36 kg body weight daily. FED WITH WELLNESS CORE DRY: reduce dry by 25 g for every 1 container wet.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 8000 IU; Vitamin D3 236 IU; Vitamin E 36 mg; Zinc (Zinc chelate of amino acids, hydrate) 69 mg; Iron (Ferrous chelate of amino acids, hydrate) 47 mg; Manganese (Manganese chelate of amino acids, hydrate) 17 mg; Copper (Cupric chelate of amino acids, hydrate) 11 mg; Iodine (Potassium Iodide) 0.2 mg; Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.038 mg

Ingredients (9)42% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 78.3%
  • carb 9.5%
  • supplement 6.3%
  • veg 6.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Chicken 48%Chickenmeat · medium4848.0
2Chicken BrothChicken Brothmeat · medium-10.5
3Beef 4%Beefmeat · medium44.0
4Green Beans 3%Green Beansveg · good33.0
5Red Peppers 3%Red Pepperveg · good33.0
6Potato StarchPotato starchcarb · poor-9.5
7Chicken LiverChicken Livermeat · good-8.4
8EggsEggmeat · good-7.3
9MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-6.3
  1. 1. Chicken 48%48% declared48.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  2. 2. Chicken Broth10.5% estimated
    Chicken Broth · meat · medium
  3. 3. Beef 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
    Beef · meat · medium
  4. 4. Green Beans 3%3% declared3.0% estimated
    Green Beans · veg · good
  5. 5. Red Peppers 3%3% declared3.0% estimated
    Red Pepper · veg · good
  6. 6. Potato Starch9.5% estimated
    Potato starch · carb · poor
  7. 7. Chicken Liver8.4% estimated
    Chicken Liver · meat · good
  8. 8. Eggs7.3% estimated
    Egg · meat · good
  9. 9. Minerals6.3% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-29

Brand and contact: Wellness CORE

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-29
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
wellnesscore.eu

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score is 72 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.3 points, and the meat content contributed +4.8 points. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -4.4, while being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.32
Meat share of dry matter50.4%0.096+4.84
Carb share of dry matter8.2%-0.115-0.94
Vegetable share of dry matter3.1%-0.005-0.02
Supplement share of dry matter20.1%-0.012-0.24
Recipe graded poor9.4%-0.065-0.61
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient9.4%0.060+0.57
Undeclared quantities42.0%-0.106-4.43
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Chunksyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.32
Meat share of dry matter50.4%0.096+4.84
Carb share of dry matter8.2%-0.115-0.94
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter3.1%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter20.1%-0.012-0.24
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor9.4%-0.065-0.61
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient9.4%0.060+0.57
Undeclared quantities42.0%-0.106-4.43
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksyes-0.672-0.67
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
71.5
Final score
72/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v372/100current
v273/100
v172/100
v1.973/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein838.1 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat838.1 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre0.52.4 (band 0.5 to 5%)95.1
Energy (kcal/100g)83395.2100

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 8000 IU
  • Vitamin D3 236 IU
  • Vitamin E 36 mg
  • Zinc (Zinc chelate of amino acids, hydrate) 69 mg
  • Iron (Ferrous chelate of amino acids, hydrate) 47 mg
  • Manganese (Manganese chelate of amino acids, hydrate) 17 mg
  • Copper (Cupric chelate of amino acids, hydrate) 11 mg
  • Iodine (Potassium Iodide) 0.2 mg
  • Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.038 mg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (58% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)11.6/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Complete & balanced" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.

6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Easily digestible recipe with prebiotic fibres and probiotics (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Supports optimal energy and lean body with high-quality proteins (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Complete & balanced (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
Supports healthy skin & shiny coat with omega-3 fatty acids from salmon (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Grain-free to support their sensitive tummies (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Enriched with vitamins and minerals (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Fresh meat first to deliver a tasty meal, bowl after bowl (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Small Breed Savoury Medleys Flavoured with Roasted Chicken, Beef, Green Beans & Red Peppers

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Wellness CORE

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.