Webbox Adult Chicken with Sweet Potato, Green Beans and Red Pepper Wet Dog Food
Wet Chunks · complete
Our verdict
Is Webbox Adult Chicken with Sweet Potato, Green Beans and Red Pepper Wet Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet food in chunks for adult dogs, with chicken, sweet potatoes and green beans as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 26% · Fat 13%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 26% |
| Fat | 13% |
| Fibre | 2% |
| Ash | 9% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Dog Weight (Kg) | Grams per Day 1 – 5 | 30 – 100 5 – 10 | 100 – 165 10 – 20 | 165 – 280 20 – 30 | 280 – 380 30 – 40 | 380 – 470
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (11)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 58.8%
- supplement 18.2%
- meat 11.8%
- carb 11.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken (65%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 65 | 65.0 |
| 2 | Sweet Potato (4%) | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 3 | Green Beans (4%) | Green Beans | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 4 | Red Pepper (4%) | Red Pepper | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 5 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 6 | Chicory Root (a source of Prebiotic FOS) | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 3.9 |
| 7 | Yucca Schidigera Extract | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 3.6 |
| 8 | Nettle | Nettles | veg · good | - | 3.3 |
| 9 | Rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 3.0 |
| 10 | Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 2.7 |
| 11 | Sage | Sage | veg · good | - | 2.4 |
- 1. Chicken (65%)65% declared65.0% estimated
- 2. Sweet Potato (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 3. Green Beans (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 4. Red Pepper (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 5. Minerals4.2% estimated
- 6. Chicory Root (a source of Prebiotic FOS)3.9% estimated
- 7. Yucca Schidigera Extract3.6% estimated
- 8. Nettle3.3% estimated
- 9. Rosemary3.0% estimated
- 10. Parsley2.7% estimated
- 11. Sage2.4% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Webbox
- Website
- https://www.webbox.co.uk/
- Contact page
- www.webbox.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.webbox.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 56 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -10.6 points. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.3 points, while the carbohydrate content contributed -1 points. Finally, the processing format contributed -0.7 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.31 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.9% | -0.115 | -1.02 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 27.9% | -0.005 | -0.14 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 52.8% | -0.012 | -0.64 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.31 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.9% | -0.115 | -1.02 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 27.9% | -0.005 | -0.14 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 52.8% | -0.012 | -0.64 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Subtotal
- 55.7
- Final score
- 56/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26 | 123.8 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 13 | 61.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2 | 9.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 81 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 79% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| added prebiotic to support healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| made only with natural ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| with added vitamins and minerals (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| grain free recipe (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Packed full of chicken, sweet potato, green beans and red pepper (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Adult Chicken with Sweet Potato, Green Beans and Red Pepper Wet Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.