Walker and Drake Chicken with Carrot & Kale Dog Treats

Treat · complementaryHigh meatClear label

Chicken with Carrot & Kale Dog Treats
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is Walker and Drake Chicken with Carrot & Kale Dog Treats a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

Complementary treats for dogs of all life stages, with chicken, gram flour and glycerine as the main ingredients.

How we score

54% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 46% of the dry matter (45% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Single named animal protein: chicken.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: chicken
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 9 ingredients.
  • Uses generic terms (Chicken): the specific animal source is not stated.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints quantities for 2 ingredients.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 27.80% · Fat 9.90%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein27.80%
Fat9.90%
Fibre3.70%
Ash6.70%
Moisture20%

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (9)54% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 44.8%
  • veg 18.6%
  • carb 16.8%
  • other 8.4%
  • supplement 6.3%
  • oil 5.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1ChickenChickenmeat · medium-17.1
2Gram FlourGram flourcarb · good-15.9
3Vegetable GlycerineGlycerineother · medium-14.6
4Pea FlourPea flourcarb · medium-13.4
5Dried Carrot 4%Carrotsveg · good44.0
6Dried Kale 2%Kaleveg · good22.0
7Green Tea ExtractGreen Teaveg · good-12.2
8Yucca ExtractYucca Schidigerasupplement · good-11.0
9Dried MarigoldDried Marigoldveg · good-9.8
  1. 1. Chicken17.1% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  2. 2. Gram Flour15.9% estimated
    Gram flour · carb · good
  3. 3. Vegetable Glycerine14.6% estimated
    Glycerine · other · medium
  4. 4. Pea Flour13.4% estimated
    Pea flour · carb · medium
  5. 5. Dried Carrot 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  6. 6. Dried Kale 2%2% declared2.0% estimated
    Kale · veg · good
  7. 7. Green Tea Extract12.2% estimated
    Green Tea · veg · good
  8. 8. Yucca Extract11.0% estimated
    Yucca Schidigera · supplement · good
  9. 9. Dried Marigold9.8% estimated
    Dried Marigold · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Walker and Drake
Walker and Drake logo
Phone
01226 661104
Address
Unit 15, Darton Business Park, Barnsley, S75 5QX

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+6.99
Meat share of dry matter42.1%0.096+4.04
Carb share of dry matter19.8%-0.115-2.28
Oil share of dry matter6.5%-0.092-0.59
Vegetable share of dry matter15.0%-0.005-0.08
Supplement share of dry matter7.6%-0.012-0.09
Other share of dry matter5.5%-0.375-2.06
Undeclared quantities54.0%-0.106-5.70
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+6.99
Meat share of dry matter42.1%0.096+4.04
Carb share of dry matter19.8%-0.115-2.28
Oil share of dry matter6.5%-0.092-0.59
Vegetable share of dry matter15.0%-0.005-0.08
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter7.6%-0.012-0.09
Other share of dry matter5.5%-0.375-2.06
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities54.0%-0.106-5.70
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Subtotal
58.3
Final score
58/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v358/100current
v265/100
v164/100
v1.966/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (46% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)9.2/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "grain-free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
easy to digest (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Gluten free (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Low sugar (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion
grain-free (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Chicken leads the recipe as the primary protein source, supported by carrot and kale for added fibre, vitamins and natural goodness. (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Probiotic (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No additives (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Natural Ingredients (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Chicken with Carrot & Kale soft baked treats (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No artificial flavouring (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from Walker and Drake

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.