Wagg Senior Dog Food with Chicken
Dry Extruded complete Clear label
Is Wagg Senior Dog Food with Chicken a good dog food?
We score it 47/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 47 out of 100. Printing percentages on the label boosted the score by +3.2. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -8.9. Furthermore, the processing format and the carbohydrate content lowered the score by -7 and -4.9 respectively.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
68% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe47
- Nutritionallow84
- Transparency51
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete extruded dry food for senior dogs, with meat meal, chicken and wheat as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Low in fat for its format: 8% fat on a dry-matter basis.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
- 3 poor-graded ingredients make up about 21% of the recipe.
- Low in protein: 20% protein on a dry-matter basis.
- Meat makes up an estimated 3% of the dry matter (26% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 20%
- Fat
- 7.50%
- Fibre
- 3%
- Ash
- 8.50%
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 12000 iu; Vitamin D3 1200 iu; Vitamin E 90 mg; Zinc sulphate monohydrate 50 mg; Iron (ll) sulphate monohydrate 30 mg; Manganous oxide 30 mg; Copper (ll) sulphate pentahydrate 5 mg; Calcium iodate anhydrous 0.5 mg; Sodium selenite 0.1 mg
Technological additives
Antioxidant
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You need more protein than this: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (16)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26% Meat Meal & Gravy | Meat Meal | meat | medium | 26 | 26.0 |
| 2 | 4% Chicken | Chicken | meat | medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 3 | Whole Grain Wheat | Wheat | carb | poor | - | 6.9 |
| 4 | Maize | Maize / Corn | carb | poor | - | 6.6 |
| 5 | Whole Grain Barley | Barley | carb | medium | - | 6.3 |
| 6 | Wheat Fibre | Wheat | carb | poor | - | 6.1 |
| 7 | 5% Whole Grain Rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb | medium | 5 | 5.0 |
| 8 | Whole Linseed | Linseed | veg | good | - | 5.8 |
| 9 | 1% Chicken Fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil | good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 10 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre | medium | - | 5.5 |
| 11 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil | good | - | 5.2 |
| 12 | Minerals & Vitamins | Vitamin | supplement | good | - | 4.9 |
| 13 | Chicory Root | Chicory root | veg | good | - | 4.6 |
| 14 | Glucosamine | Glucosamine | supplement | good | - | 4.3 |
| 15 | Yucca | Yucca Schidigera | supplement | good | - | 4.0 |
| 16 | Chondroitin | Chondroitin | supplement | good | - | 3.7 |
Brand
- Website
- https://waggfoods.com/
- Address
- Wagg Foods Ltd, Dalton Airfield, Topcliffe, Thirsk, North Yorkshire, YO7 3HE, UK
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- waggfoods.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.915 | +2.79 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 3.2% | 0.116 | +0.37 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 43.9% | -0.113 | -4.94 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.9% | -0.088 | -0.87 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.6% | -0.002 | -0.02 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 25.5% | -0.009 | -0.23 |
| Recipe graded poor | 20.8% | -0.045 | -0.93 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.868 | -2.60 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.4% | 0.056 | +0.41 |
| Undeclared quantities | 68.0% | -0.131 | -8.90 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -1.988 | -1.99 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 3.2 | -0.073 | -0.23 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.915 | +2.79 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 3.2% | 0.116 | +0.37 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 43.9% | -0.113 | -4.94 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.9% | -0.088 | -0.87 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.6% | -0.002 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 25.5% | -0.009 | -0.23 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 20.8% | -0.045 | -0.93 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.868 | -2.60 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.4% | 0.056 | +0.41 |
| Undeclared quantities | 68.0% | -0.131 | -8.90 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -1.988 | -1.99 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 3.2 | -0.073 | -0.23 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.236 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.01
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 47.4
- Final score
- 47/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 47/100 | current |
| v1 | 50/100 | |
| v1.9 | 51/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20 | 21.7 (band 18 to 40%) | 80.2 |
| Fat | 7.5 | 8.2 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 81 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (32% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 6.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| Contains probiotic FOS to support the population of healthy bacteria within the gut (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains an extract from the yucca plant thought to help reduce flatulent odours (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains the amino acid L-Carnitine to help support lean muscle in older dogs (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Balanced Calcium and Vitamin D for healthy teeth and bones (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added Glucosamine, Chondroitin and fish oils work together to help support mobile joints (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| No Artificial Colours or Flavours (on page) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rich in Chicken (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% complete & balanced with natural ingredients (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| with rice & tasty gravy (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Wagg
Alternatives to Senior Dog Food with Chicken
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.