Voof AUSTRALIAN inspired • vegan | Duo-Rolls
Fresh Shelf · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Voof AUSTRALIAN inspired • vegan | Duo-Rolls a good dog food?
We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete shelf-stable fresh food for adult dogs, with beetroot, lentils and sweet lupin flour as the main ingredients.
82% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9.50% · Fat 3%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9.50% |
| Fat | 3% |
| Fibre | 1.60% |
| Ash | 2.50% |
| Moisture | 73% |
| Calcium | 1.35% |
| Phosphorus | 1% |
Energy: 106 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Mindestens 12 Monate ohne Kühlung haltbar, nach dem Öffnen gekühlt lagern und innerhalb von 3-4 Tage verbrauchen.
Feeding guide
< 5 kg: 200 - 250g; 5 - 9 kg: 250 - 400g; 10 - 19 kg: 450 - 650g; 20 - 29 kg: 700 - 800g; 30 - 40 kg: 950 - 1000g
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin D3 202 i.E.; Vitamin B1 2,6 mg; Vitamin B2 3,96 mg; Vitamin B6 2,4 mg; Vitamin B12 26,4 mcg; Vitamin E 20 mg; Biotin 50 mcg; Folsäure 1,2 mg; Niacinamid 13,2 mg; Calcium-D-Pantothenat 11 mg
Ingredients (14)82% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 51.0%
- unknown 21.8%
- oil 12.3%
- carb 8.8%
- supplement 6.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6% Red beetroot | Red Beetroot | veg · good | 6 | 6.0 |
| 2 | 6% Lentils | Lentils | veg · medium | 6 | 6.0 |
| 3 | 6% Sweet lupin | Sweet Lupin Flour | carb · medium | 6 | 6.0 |
| 4 | Broccoli | Broccoli | veg · good | - | 9.6 |
| 5 | Parsnip | Parsnips | veg · good | - | 9.2 |
| 6 | Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 8.8 |
| 7 | Leaf spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 8.3 |
| 8 | Mango | Mango | veg · good | - | 7.9 |
| 9 | Hemp protein | Hemp Protein | supplement · medium | - | 7.5 |
| 10 | Sunflower oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 7.0 |
| 11 | Chia seeds | Chia Seeds | veg · good | - | 6.6 |
| 12 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 6.1 |
| 13 | Chamomile | Chamomile | veg · good | - | 5.7 |
| 14 | Linseed oil | Linseed oil | oil · good | - | 5.3 |
- 1. 6% Red beetroot6% declared6.0% estimated
- 2. 6% Lentils6% declared6.0% estimated
- 3. 6% Sweet lupin6% declared6.0% estimated
- 4. Broccoli9.6% estimated
- 5. Parsnip9.2% estimated
- 6. Rice8.8% estimated
- 7. Leaf spinach8.3% estimated
- 8. Mango7.9% estimated
- 9. Hemp protein7.5% estimated
- 10. Sunflower oil7.0% estimated
- 11. Chia seeds6.6% estimated
- 12. Minerals6.1% estimated
- 13. Chamomile5.7% estimated
- 14. Linseed oil5.3% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-03
Brand and contact: Voof
- Website
- https://www.voof.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-03
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.voof.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 56 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -8.7. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.8 to the total. Additionally, the oil and fat content lowered the score by -2.3, while being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.84 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.115 | -1.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 24.8% | -0.092 | -2.28 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 25.7% | -0.005 | -0.13 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.5% | -0.012 | -0.14 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 22.2% | -0.027 | -0.59 |
| Undeclared quantities | 82.0% | -0.106 | -8.66 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.84 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.115 | -1.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 24.8% | -0.092 | -2.28 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 25.7% | -0.005 | -0.13 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.5% | -0.012 | -0.14 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 22.2% | -0.027 | -0.59 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 82.0% | -0.106 | -8.66 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 56.3
- Final score
- 56/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9.5 | 35.2 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 3 | 11.1 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 93.2 |
| Fibre | 1.6 | 5.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.35 | 5 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 0 |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 3.7 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 0 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 91 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 106 | 392.6 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin D3 202 i.E.
- Vitamin B1 2,6 mg
- Vitamin B2 3,96 mg
- Vitamin B6 2,4 mg
- Vitamin B12 26,4 mcg
- Vitamin E 20 mg
- Biotin 50 mcg
- Folsäure 1,2 mg
- Niacinamid 13,2 mg
- Calcium-D-Pantothenat 11 mg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (18% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 3.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Alleinfuttermittel für Hunde" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alleinfuttermittel für Hunde (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| flexitarisch (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Duo-Rolls 2x400g (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| AUSTRALIAN inspired • vegan (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| flexitarisches Nassfutter (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Unser veganes Komplettmenü setzt vollständig auf pflanzliche Inhaltsstoffe. (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to AUSTRALIAN inspired • vegan | Duo-Rolls
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.