Skinner's Energy Bar

Treat · complementaryHigh meatClear label

Energy Bar
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is Skinner's Energy Bar a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

Complementary treats for dogs of all life stages, with chicken, dried chicken protein and chicken oil and fat as the main ingredients.

How we score

53% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 46% of the dry matter (50% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Single named animal protein: chicken.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Single named protein: chicken
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 10 ingredients.
  • Names its animal sources (2 named ingredients).
  • Uses generic terms (Chicken): the specific animal source is not stated.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints quantities for 3 ingredients.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 27.50% · Fat 12.60%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fedDry matter
Protein27.50%33.50%
Fat12.60%15.40%
Fibre1.60%2%
Ash6.30%7.70%
Moisture18%-
Carbohydrates-41.50%

Energy: 344 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

Give while training or between meals; treats should not exceed 10% of daily food allowance. Feed 30 minutes before activity or when a boost is needed. Ensure fresh water is available.

Additives declared on the label

Technological additives

Preservatives

Ingredients (10)53% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 49.5%
  • carb 15.7%
  • veg 11.6%
  • other 8.2%
  • oil 7.5%
  • supplement 7.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1ChickenChickenmeat · medium-9.5
2Chicken Meal (36%)Dried chicken proteinmeat · good3636.0
3Chicken Fat (7.5%)Chicken Oil and Fatoil · good7.57.5
4Chicken Liver (4%)Chicken Livermeat · good44.0
5English Wholemeal FlourWheatcarb · poor-8.9
6Vegetable GlycerineGlycerineother · medium-8.2
7GelatineGelatinsupplement · medium-7.5
8HoneyHoneycarb · medium-6.8
9Dried CarrotCarrotsveg · good-6.1
10Dried AppleApplesveg · good-5.5
  1. 1. Chicken9.5% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  2. 2. Chicken Meal (36%)36% declared36.0% estimated
    Dried chicken protein · meat · good
  3. 3. Chicken Fat (7.5%)7.5% declared7.5% estimated
    Chicken Oil and Fat · oil · good
  4. 4. Chicken Liver (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
    Chicken Liver · meat · good
  5. 5. English Wholemeal Flour8.9% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  6. 6. Vegetable Glycerine8.2% estimated
    Glycerine · other · medium
  7. 7. Gelatine7.5% estimated
    Gelatin · supplement · medium
  8. 8. Honey6.8% estimated
    Honey · carb · medium
  9. 9. Dried Carrot6.1% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  10. 10. Dried Apple5.5% estimated
    Apples · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13

Brand and contact: Skinner's

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-13
Product page
www.skinners.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.20
Meat share of dry matter42.9%0.096+4.12
Carb share of dry matter17.5%-0.115-2.02
Oil share of dry matter9.3%-0.092-0.86
Vegetable share of dry matter13.1%-0.005-0.07
Supplement share of dry matter8.7%-0.012-0.11
Other share of dry matter5.1%-0.375-1.92
Recipe graded poor8.9%-0.065-0.58
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient8.9%0.060+0.53
Undeclared quantities52.5%-0.106-5.54
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.20
Meat share of dry matter42.9%0.096+4.12
Carb share of dry matter17.5%-0.115-2.02
Oil share of dry matter9.3%-0.092-0.86
Vegetable share of dry matter13.1%-0.005-0.07
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter8.7%-0.012-0.11
Other share of dry matter5.1%-0.375-1.92
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor8.9%-0.065-0.58
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient8.9%0.060+0.53
Undeclared quantities52.5%-0.106-5.54
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
56.9
Final score
57/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v357/100current
v264/100
v163/100
v1.964/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (47.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)9.5/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Supports strong muscles (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Supports immune system (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Helps improve stamina (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Helps maintain a healthy coat (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Made using natural ingredients (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from Skinner's

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.