RUN Training Treats Ginger and Turmeric Mini Paws

Treat complementary

This is a treat, not a complete diet. The 1–100 rating applies to complete foods, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Is RUN Training Treats Ginger and Turmeric Mini Paws a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

How we score

96% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Recipe
Not applicable
Nutritional
Not applicable
Transparency
31
Safety
100
Evidencelimited
33

Complementary baked dry treats for dogs of all life stages, with pea meal, gram flour and glycerine as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

Single named animal protein: turkey.
Doesn't list grain ingredients.

Why you might not

A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
No analytical breakdown is published.

View the source page

What the label tells us

The label lists 7 ingredients.
Names its animal sources (1 named ingredient).
Every animal ingredient is a named source.
Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
Prints quantities for 1 ingredient.

Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Estimated composition

carb38.9%

other16.9%

veg15.4%

meat15.2%

oil13.5%

Typical analysis (as fed)

No analysis recorded yet.

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Reviews

1 reviews on this product · 5.0/5

Who is this food for?

Suits

Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
Single named protein: turkey
Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (7)

#	As declared	Matched	Category	Tier	Declared %	Est. %
1	Pea Meal	Pea Meal	carb	medium	-	20.3
2	Gram Flour	Gram flour	carb	good	-	18.6
3	Vegetable Glycerine	Glycerine	other	medium	-	16.9
4	Turkey Meal	Dehydrated turkey protein	meat	good	-	15.2
5	Rapeseed Oil	Rapeseed oil	oil	good	-	13.5
6	Ginger (3.6%)	Ginger	veg	good	3.6	3.6
7	Turmeric	Turmeric	veg	good	-	11.8

Brand

Website: https://www.rundogfood.com/

Trust and provenance

Recall history: No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked: 2026-09-14
Product page: www.rundogfood.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	32.336	+32.34
Average ingredient quality	0.8	9.915	+7.44
Meat share of dry matter	16.5%	0.116	+1.92
Carb share of dry matter	41.3%	-0.113	-4.65
Oil share of dry matter	15.8%	-0.088	-1.39
Vegetable share of dry matter	16.4%	-0.002	-0.03
Other share of dry matter	10.0%	-0.371	-3.70
Undeclared quantities	96.4%	-0.131	-12.62
Processing multiplier	1.00	32.336	+32.34
Processing: Dry Baked	yes	-2.321	-2.32

Show all 40 components

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	32.336	+32.34
Average ingredient quality	0.8	9.915	+7.44
Meat share of dry matter	16.5%	0.116	+1.92
Carb share of dry matter	41.3%	-0.113	-4.65
Oil share of dry matter	15.8%	-0.088	-1.39
Vegetable share of dry matter	16.4%	-0.002	-0.03
Additive share of dry matter	0.0%	0.177	+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.009	+0.00
Other share of dry matter	10.0%	-0.371	-3.70
Unrecognised share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.022	+0.00
Recipe graded poor	0.0%	-0.045	+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe	0.0%	-0.182	+0.00
Number of poor ingredients	0	-0.868	+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient	0.0%	0.056	+0.00
Undeclared quantities	96.4%	-0.131	-12.62
Prints ingredient percentages	no	3.194	+0.00
Complete diet	no	1.703	+0.00
Frozen or chilled fresh	no	11.440	+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	no	-0.506	+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	no	-1.988	+0.00
High carb and low meat	no	-1.250	+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages	0.0	-0.073	+0.00
Meat share × fresh	0.0	-0.339	+0.00
Fresh × high meat	0.0	16.475	+0.00
Additive penalty	0.00	0.236	+0.00
Processing multiplier	1.00	32.336	+32.34
Processing: Raw	no	13.322	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilled	no	7.712	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozen	no	6.583	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigerated	no	4.857	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelf	no	0.072	+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Dried	no	11.127	+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Dried	no	9.320	+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressed	no	4.569	+0.00
Processing: Dry Baked	yes	-2.321	-2.32
Processing: Dry Extruded	no	-6.996	+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moist	no	-6.833	+0.00
Processing: Dry Muesli	no	-10.711	+0.00
Processing: Wet Pate	no	2.935	+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunks	no	2.292	+0.00

Processing-type offset: +0.05
Subtotal: 49.4
Final score: 49/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

Item	Points
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (3.6% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)	0.7/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file	0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file	0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file	0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)	5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file	0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)	5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)	10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file	0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.

Claim	Type	Substantiation
Ginger and Turmeric Mini Paws (on pack)	Content	Manufacturer assertion
Teeny-tiny little munches, to keep them zooming back for more (on page)	Content	Manufacturer assertion