Rùn Chicken & Sweet Potato
Dry Cold Pressed complete High meat Clear label
Is Rùn Chicken & Sweet Potato a good dog food?
We score it 76/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 76 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list adds +7 points, while the meat content contributes +4.5 points, and the processing format adds +4.6 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduce the score by -4.8 points.
37% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe76
- Nutritionalmedium97
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete cold-pressed dry food for adult dogs, with chicken, chicken oil and fat and chicken liver as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Scores 76, in the top quarter of dry foods we track.
- Meat makes up an estimated 39% of the dry matter (31% as fed).
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
Why you might not
We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 28%
- Fat
- 12%
- Fibre
- 4%
- Ash
- 7%
- Moisture
- 8%
- Calcium
- 1.20%
- Phosphorus
- 1%
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
monocalcium phosphate 10g/kg; calcium iodate anhydrous 1.5 mg/kg; sodium selenite 0.1 mg/kg; iron (II) sulphate monohydrate 80 mg/kg; copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate 8 mg/kg; zinc sulphate monohydrate 100 mg/kg; manganous sulphate monohydrate 10 mg/kg; vitamin A - retinyl acetate 15000 IU/kg; vitamin D3-cholecalciferol 1100 IU/kg; vitamin E-alpha tocopherol acetate 130 mg/kg; vitamin B1 10 mg/kg; thiamine 9.17 mg/kg; riboflavin 10 mg/kg; vitamin B6 5 mg/kg; vitamin B12 0.04 mg/kg; niacin 25 mg/kg; calcium pantothenate 20 mg/kg; folic acid 1 mg/kg; biotin 0.15 mg/kg; vitamin C 30 mg/kg; choline chloride 300 mg/kg
Technological additives
Natural Antioxidants (mix of Vitamin E and Rosemary Extracts)
Storage
Store in a cool dry place.
Feeding guide
Please note that amount shown is intended as a guide per day rather than per meal.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (20)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dried Ground Chicken 27% | Chicken | meat | medium | 27 | 27.0 |
| 2 | Chicken Fat 7% | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil | good | 7 | 7.0 |
| 3 | Chicken Protein Peptides 3% | Chicken | meat | medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 4 | Chicken Liver 1% | Chicken Liver | meat | good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 5 | Sweet Potato 25% | Sweet Potatoes | carb | good | 25 | 25.0 |
| 6 | Tapioca | Tapioca | carb | medium | - | 3.2 |
| 7 | Yellow Pea | Peas | veg | good | - | 3.1 |
| 8 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre | medium | - | 3.0 |
| 9 | Pea Fibre | Pea Fibre | fibre | medium | - | 2.9 |
| 10 | Seaweed | Seaweed | veg | good | - | 2.8 |
| 11 | Glucosamine | Glucosamine | supplement | good | - | 2.7 |
| 12 | Chondroitin | Chondroitin | supplement | good | - | 2.6 |
| 13 | Amino Acids (DL Methionine) | Inositol and amino acids | supplement | good | - | 2.5 |
| 14 | Carnitine | Carnitine | supplement | good | - | 2.4 |
| 15 | Mannan-oligosaccharides | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement | good | - | 2.3 |
| 16 | Prebiotic MOS | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement | good | - | 2.1 |
| 17 | Yucca Shidigera | Yucca Schidigera | supplement | good | - | 2.0 |
| 18 | Chicory Root Extract (as a source of Prebiotic Fructo-oligosaccharides and Inulin) | Chicory Root Extract | fibre | good | - | 1.9 |
| 19 | Rosemary Extract | Rosemary | veg | good | - | 1.8 |
| 20 | Natural Antioxidants (mix of Vitamin E and Rosemary Extracts) | Antioxidants | additive | poor | - | 1.7 |
Brand
- Website
- https://www.rundogfood.com/
- Contact page
- www.rundogfood.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.rundogfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.915 | +6.97 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 38.8% | 0.116 | +4.50 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.5% | -0.113 | -1.19 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 10.3% | -0.088 | -0.91 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.9% | -0.002 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 2.3% | 0.177 | +0.41 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.7% | -0.009 | -0.20 |
| Recipe graded poor | 1.7% | -0.045 | -0.08 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 1.7% | 0.056 | +0.10 |
| Undeclared quantities | 37.0% | -0.131 | -4.84 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | -0.506 | -0.51 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 38.8 | -0.073 | -2.84 |
| Additive penalty | -2.06 | 0.236 | -0.49 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | 4.569 | +4.57 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.915 | +6.97 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 38.8% | 0.116 | +4.50 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.5% | -0.113 | -1.19 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 10.3% | -0.088 | -0.91 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.9% | -0.002 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 2.3% | 0.177 | +0.41 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.7% | -0.009 | -0.20 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 1.7% | -0.045 | -0.08 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 1.7% | 0.056 | +0.10 |
| Undeclared quantities | 37.0% | -0.131 | -4.84 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | -0.506 | -0.51 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 38.8 | -0.073 | -2.84 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -2.06 | 0.236 | -0.49 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | 4.569 | +4.57 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.996 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 76.2
- Final score
- 76/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 76/100 | current |
| v1 | 75/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28 | 30.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 12 | 13 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 4 | 4.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.2 | 1.3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 94.1 |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 1.1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 82 |
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (63% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 12.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| A complete and balanced food for ADULT dogs. (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| ideal for sensitive tummies (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Cold pressed & nutritious (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| uses single-source-animal-protein (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| We don’t use any hidden oils/fats, so you won’t find any Fish-oil lurking in our Chicken recipe. (on page) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
| This recipe is grain-free (on page) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Rùn
Alternatives to Chicken & Sweet Potato
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.