Ruff's Recipes One-Pot Chicken with Sweet Potato and Peas

Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label

One-Pot Chicken with Sweet Potato and Peas
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Ruff's Recipes One-Pot Chicken with Sweet Potato and Peas a good dog food?

We score it 74/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with chicken, sweet potatoes and peas as the main ingredients.

How we score

32% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 40% of the dry matter (60% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Single named animal protein: chicken.

Why you might not

  • High in fat: 31% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: chicken
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • You are limiting fat: 30.6% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 9.50% · Fat 5.50%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein9.50%
Fat5.50%
Fibre1%
Ash2.50%
Moisture82%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.17%
Omega-6 fatty acids1.80%
Calcium0.40%
Phosphorus0.30%

Energy: 85 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Always store in a cool dry place. Once opened, keep refrigerated and use within 2 days.

Feeding guide

Up to 5kg: 1-3 trays; 5-12kg: 3-5.5 trays; 12-25kg: 5.5-9.5 trays; 25-45kg: 9.5-15 trays daily.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Zinc (Zinc chelate of amino acids hydrate) 15.3 mg/kg; Manganese (Manganese chelate of amino acids hydrate) 3.2 mg/kg; Iodine (Calcium iodate, anhydrous) 0.5 mg/kg; Copper (Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 2.4 mg/kg

Ingredients (19)32% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 60.0%
  • veg 26.2%
  • supplement 9.8%
  • carb 4.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Chicken (60%)Chickenmeat · medium6060.0
2Sweet Potato (4%)Sweet Potatoescarb · good44.0
3Peas (4%)Peasveg · good44.0
4MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-9.8
5LinseedLinseedveg · good-8.6
60.02% SeaweedSeaweedveg · good0.020.02
70.02% NettleNettlesveg · good0.020.02
80.02% RosemaryRosemaryveg · good0.020.02
90.02% BayBay Leafveg · medium0.020.02
100.02% DillDillveg · good0.020.02
110.02% MintMintveg · good0.020.02
120.02% OreganoOreganoveg · good0.020.02
130.02% ThymeThymeveg · good0.020.02
140.02% ChamomileChamomileveg · good0.020.02
150.02% TurmericTurmericveg · good0.020.02
160.02% Reishi MushroomReishi Mushroomsupplement · good0.020.02
170.02% Valerian RootValerian Rootveg · medium0.020.02
18Chicory (a source of Inulin)Chicoryveg · good-7.3
19Dried Blueberry.Blueberriesveg · good-6.1
  1. 1. Chicken (60%)60% declared60.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  2. 2. Sweet Potato (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
    Sweet Potatoes · carb · good
  3. 3. Peas (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
    Peas · veg · good
  4. 4. Minerals9.8% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  5. 5. Linseed8.6% estimated
    Linseed · veg · good
  6. 6. 0.02% Seaweed0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Seaweed · veg · good
  7. 7. 0.02% Nettle0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Nettles · veg · good
  8. 8. 0.02% Rosemary0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Rosemary · veg · good
  9. 9. 0.02% Bay0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Bay Leaf · veg · medium
  10. 10. 0.02% Dill0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Dill · veg · good
  11. 11. 0.02% Mint0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Mint · veg · good
  12. 12. 0.02% Oregano0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Oregano · veg · good
  13. 13. 0.02% Thyme0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Thyme · veg · good
  14. 14. 0.02% Chamomile0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Chamomile · veg · good
  15. 15. 0.02% Turmeric0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Turmeric · veg · good
  16. 16. 0.02% Reishi Mushroom0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Reishi Mushroom · supplement · good
  17. 17. 0.02% Valerian Root0.02% declared0.02% estimated
    Valerian Root · veg · medium
  18. 18. Chicory (a source of Inulin)7.3% estimated
    Chicory · veg · good
  19. 19. Dried Blueberry.6.1% estimated
    Blueberries · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13

Brand and contact: Ruff's Recipes

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-13
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.petsathome.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

53 reviews on this product · 4.9/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score is 74 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +6.4 points, and the meat content contributed +3.9 points. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -3.4, while being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.35
Meat share of dry matter40.2%0.096+3.86
Carb share of dry matter2.4%-0.115-0.28
Vegetable share of dry matter35.8%-0.005-0.18
Supplement share of dry matter21.6%-0.012-0.26
Undeclared quantities31.8%-0.106-3.35
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.35
Meat share of dry matter40.2%0.096+3.86
Carb share of dry matter2.4%-0.115-0.28
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter35.8%-0.005-0.18
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter21.6%-0.012-0.26
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities31.8%-0.106-3.35
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
74.1
Final score
74/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v374/100current
v277/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein9.552.8 (band 21.25 to 40%)100
Fat5.530.6 (band 6.493055555555555 to 20%)100
Fibre15.6 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium0.42.2 (band 0.5902777777777778 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus0.31.7 (band 0.47222222222222227 to 1.6%)95.8
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.31.3 (band 1 to 2%)90
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100
Energy (kcal/100g)85472.2100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 4 nutritional additives on the label
  • Zinc (Zinc chelate of amino acids hydrate) 15.3 mg/kg
  • Manganese (Manganese chelate of amino acids hydrate) 3.2 mg/kg
  • Iodine (Calcium iodate, anhydrous) 0.5 mg/kg
  • Copper (Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 2.4 mg/kg

High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (68.2% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)13.6/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Grain free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Grain free (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
High meat content (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Skin & coat care (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Gut health support (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Grain free - hypoallergenic (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Includes omega-6 (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Added vitamins & minerals (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to One-Pot Chicken with Sweet Potato and Peas

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Ruff's Recipes

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.