Royal Canin X-Small Ageing 12+

Dry Extruded · complete

Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Royal Canin X-Small Ageing 12+ a good dog food?

We score it 37/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

Complete extruded dry food for senior dogs, with rice, wheat and dehydrated poultry proteins as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 6 poor-graded ingredients make up about 31% of the recipe.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
  • Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 24% · Fat 16%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein24%
Fat16%
Fibre1.70%
Ash4.80%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Store the product in a cool, dry place.

Feeding guide

Feeding amounts provided are a guideline. Speak to a pet professional regarding specific amounts for your pet. Fresh water should be available at all times.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A: 20300 IU/kg; Vitamin D3: 900 IU/kg; Vitamin C: 400 mg/kg; Iron (3b103): 38 mg/kg; Iptine (3b201, 3b202): 3.8 mg/kg; Copper (3b405, 3b406): 12 mg/kg; Manganese (3b502, 3b504): 50 mg/kg; Zinc (3b603, 3b605, 3b606): 137 mg/kg; Selenium (3b801, 3b811, 3b812): 0.06 mg/kg

Technological additives

Preservatives; Antioxidants

Ingredients (19)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 37.3%
  • oil 20.1%
  • supplement 16.6%
  • meat 11.9%
  • fibre 10.1%
  • veg 3.6%
  • additive 0.3%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1RiceRice - whitecarb · medium-7.2
2wheat flourWheatcarb · poor-7.0
3dehydrated poultry proteinsDehydrated Poultry Proteinsmeat · good-6.8
4maize flourMaize Flourcarb · medium-6.6
5animal fatsUnspecified Animal Fats and Oilsoil · poor-6.4
6wheatWheatcarb · poor-6.2
7maize glutenMaize glutencarb · poor-6.0
8wheat glutenWheat Glutencarb · poor-5.8
9hydrolysed animal proteinsHydrolysed Animal Proteinmeat · medium-5.6
10chicory pulpChicory Pulpfibre · medium-5.4
11pentasodium triphosphate (0.35%)Pentasodium Triphosphateadditive · poor0.350.3
12fish oilFish Oiloil · good-5.2
13psyllium husks and seedsPsylliumfibre · good-5.0
14soya oilSoybean oiloil · medium-4.8
15yeasts productsYeastsupplement · good-4.6
16fructo-oligosaccharidesFructo-oligosaccharidessupplement · good-4.4
17algal oil Schizochytrium sp.Algae Oiloil · good-4.2
18yeastsYeastsupplement · good-4.0
19marigold mealCalendulaveg · good-3.8
  1. 1. Rice7.2% estimated
    Rice - white · carb · medium
  2. 2. wheat flour7.0% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  3. 3. dehydrated poultry proteins6.8% estimated
  4. 4. maize flour6.6% estimated
    Maize Flour · carb · medium
  5. 5. animal fats6.4% estimated
  6. 6. wheat6.2% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  7. 7. maize gluten6.0% estimated
    Maize gluten · carb · poor
  8. 8. wheat gluten5.8% estimated
    Wheat Gluten · carb · poor
  9. 9. hydrolysed animal proteins5.6% estimated
    Hydrolysed Animal Protein · meat · medium
  10. 10. chicory pulp5.4% estimated
    Chicory Pulp · fibre · medium
  11. 11. pentasodium triphosphate (0.35%)0.35% declared0.3% estimated
    Pentasodium Triphosphate · additive · poor
  12. 12. fish oil5.2% estimated
    Fish Oil · oil · good
  13. 13. psyllium husks and seeds5.0% estimated
    Psyllium · fibre · good
  14. 14. soya oil4.8% estimated
    Soybean oil · oil · medium
  15. 15. yeasts products4.6% estimated
    Yeast · supplement · good
  16. 16. fructo-oligosaccharides4.4% estimated
    Fructo-oligosaccharides · supplement · good
  17. 17. algal oil Schizochytrium sp.4.2% estimated
    Algae Oil · oil · good
  18. 18. yeasts4.0% estimated
    Yeast · supplement · good
  19. 19. marigold meal3.8% estimated
    Calendula · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-09

Brand and contact: Royal Canin

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-09
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.royalcanin.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

27 reviews on this product · 4.5/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall score of 37 out of 100. Being labelled nutritionally complete adds +2.3 points to the total. However, ingredients without printed percentages deducts -10.5, the processing format takes away -6.7, and the carbohydrate content reduces the score by -4.1.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.29.191+2.22
Carb share of dry matter36.0%-0.115-4.14
Oil share of dry matter21.6%-0.092-1.99
Vegetable share of dry matter3.5%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter0.3%0.163+0.06
Supplement share of dry matter16.7%-0.012-0.20
Recipe graded poor30.6%-0.065-1.99
Number of poor ingredients6-0.876-5.26
Largest single poor ingredient6.7%0.060+0.40
Undeclared quantities99.7%-0.106-10.52
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-0.780.222-0.17
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.29.191+2.22
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter36.0%-0.115-4.14
Oil share of dry matter21.6%-0.092-1.99
Vegetable share of dry matter3.5%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter0.3%0.163+0.06
Supplement share of dry matter16.7%-0.012-0.20
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor30.6%-0.065-1.99
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients6-0.876-5.26
Largest single poor ingredient6.7%0.060+0.40
Undeclared quantities99.7%-0.106-10.52
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-0.780.222-0.17
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
36.9
Final score
37/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v337/100current
v239/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2426.5 (band 18 to 40%)93.2
Fat1617.7 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre1.71.9 (band 0.5 to 5%)88.4

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A: 20300 IU/kg
  • Vitamin D3: 900 IU/kg
  • Vitamin C: 400 mg/kg
  • Iron (3b103): 38 mg/kg
  • Iptine (3b201, 3b202): 3.8 mg/kg
  • Copper (3b405, 3b406): 12 mg/kg
  • Manganese (3b502, 3b504): 50 mg/kg
  • Zinc (3b603, 3b605, 3b606): 137 mg/kg
  • Selenium (3b801, 3b811, 3b812): 0.06 mg/kg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (0.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)0.1/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✓ Batch and date labelling (mandatory)5/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Helps maintain a healthy immune system. Enriched with EPA, DHA and vitamin C. (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Helps reduce tartar formation daily thanks to calcium chelator. (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Enriched with essential nutrients (EPA, DHA and vitamins) to enjoy a lifelong vitality. (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to X-Small Ageing 12+

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Royal Canin

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.