Our verdict
Is Royal Canin Rottweiler Puppy a good dog food?
We score it 42/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete extruded dry food for puppies, with dehydrated poultry proteins, rice and vegetable protein extracts as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists crustaceans
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists dehydrated pork protein
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (21)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 29.9%
- meat 21.2%
- oil 14.7%
- fibre 13.9%
- supplement 12.6%
- additive 4.1%
- veg 3.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dehydrated poultry protein | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | - | 6.5 |
| 2 | rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 6.4 |
| 3 | vegetable protein isolate | Vegetable protein extracts | carb · poor | - | 6.2 |
| 4 | maize flour | Maize Flour | carb · medium | - | 6.0 |
| 5 | maize | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 5.9 |
| 6 | animal fats | Unspecified Animal Fats and Oils | oil · poor | - | 5.7 |
| 7 | dehydrated pork protein | Dehydrated Pork Protein | meat · good | - | 5.6 |
| 8 | wheat flour | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 5.4 |
| 9 | hydrolysed animal proteins | Hydrolysed Animal Protein | meat · medium | - | 5.2 |
| 10 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 5.1 |
| 11 | beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 4.9 |
| 12 | vegetable fibres | Vegetable fibre | fibre · medium | - | 4.7 |
| 13 | soya oil | Soybean oil | oil · medium | - | 4.6 |
| 14 | fish oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 4.4 |
| 15 | fructo-oligo-saccharides (0.34%) | Fructo-oligosaccharides | supplement · good | 0.34 | 0.3 |
| 16 | psyllium husks and seeds | Psyllium | fibre · good | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | hydrolysed yeast | Hydrolysed Yeast | additive · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 18 | hydrolysed crustaceans (source of glucosamine) | Crustaceans | meat · good | - | 3.9 |
| 19 | yeasts extracts | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 3.8 |
| 20 | marigold extract (source of lutein) | Calendula | veg · good | - | 3.6 |
| 21 | hydrolysed cartilage (source of chondroitin) | Hydrolysed Cartilage | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
- 1. dehydrated poultry protein6.5% estimated
- 2. rice6.4% estimated
- 3. vegetable protein isolate6.2% estimated
- 4. maize flour6.0% estimated
- 5. maize5.9% estimated
- 6. animal fats5.7% estimated
- 7. dehydrated pork protein5.6% estimated
- 8. wheat flour5.4% estimated
- 9. hydrolysed animal proteins5.2% estimated
- 10. minerals5.1% estimated
- 11. beet pulp4.9% estimated
- 12. vegetable fibres4.7% estimated
- 13. soya oil4.6% estimated
- 14. fish oil4.4% estimated
- 15. fructo-oligo-saccharides (0.34%)0.34% declared0.3% estimated
- 16. psyllium husks and seeds4.2% estimated
- 17. hydrolysed yeast4.1% estimated
- 18. hydrolysed crustaceans (source of glucosamine)3.9% estimated
- 19. yeasts extracts3.8% estimated
- 20. marigold extract (source of lutein)3.6% estimated
- 21. hydrolysed cartilage (source of chondroitin)3.4% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 31% · Fat 16%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 31% |
| Fat | 16% |
| Fibre | 1.80% |
| Ash | 7.90% |
| Calcium | 1.26% |
| Phosphorus | 1% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
To be stored in a cool, dry place.
Feeding guide
Age (months) | Adult weight = 40 kg | Adult weight = 45 kg | Adult weight = 50 kg 2 m | 295 g (3 cups) | 307 g (3+1/8 cups) | 360 g (3+5/8 cups) 3 m | 383 g (3+7/8 cups) | 404 g (4+1/8 cups) | 448 g (4+5/8 cups) 4 m | 422 g (4+2/8 cups) | 447 g (4+1/8 cups) | 489 g (5 cups) 6 m | 553 g (5+5/8 cups) | 604 g (6+1/8 cups) | 654 g (6+5/8 cups) 8 m | 562 g (5+6/8 cups) | 650 g (6+5/8 cups) | 706 g (7+1/8 cups) 10 m | 526 g (5+3/8 cups) | 608 g (6+1/8 cups) | 665 g (6+6/8 cups) 12 m | 462 g (4+6/8 cups) | 506 g (5+1/8 cups) | 583 g (5+7/8 cups) 14 m | 454 g (4+4/8 cups) | 498 g (5 cups) | 543 g (5+4/8 cups) 19 m | Transition to Rottweiler Adult | Transition to Rottweiler Adult | Transition to Rottweiler Adult
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A: 26500 IU; Vitamin D3: 700 IU; Vitamin E: 530 mg; E1 (Iron): 41 mg; E2 (Iodine): 4.1 mg; E4 (Copper): 13 mg; E5 (Manganese): 54 mg; E6 (Zinc): 135 mg; E8 (Selenium): 0.09 mg; L-carnitine: 300 mg
Technological additives
Clinoptilolite of sedimentary origin: 10 g; Preservatives; Antioxidants
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-09
Brand and contact: Royal Canin
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-09
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.royalcanin.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
28 reviews on this product · 4.8/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a final score of 42 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +3.5 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.5. Additionally, the processing format deducted -6.7 and the carbohydrate content contributed -3.4.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.46 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 29.8% | -0.115 | -3.43 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.4% | -0.092 | -1.51 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.1% | 0.163 | +0.67 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 13.0% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Recipe graded poor | 17.3% | -0.065 | -1.13 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.2% | 0.060 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.7% | -0.106 | -10.52 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -5.45 | 0.222 | -1.21 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.46 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 29.8% | -0.115 | -3.43 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.4% | -0.092 | -1.51 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.6% | -0.005 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.1% | 0.163 | +0.67 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 13.0% | -0.012 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 17.3% | -0.065 | -1.13 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.2% | 0.060 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.7% | -0.106 | -10.52 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -5.45 | 0.222 | -1.21 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 42.4
- Final score
- 42/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 31 | 34.3 | 100 |
| Fat | 16 | 17.7 | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.26 | 1.4 | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 1.1 | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.3 | 1.3 | 100 |
Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A: 26500 IU
- Vitamin D3: 700 IU
- Vitamin E: 530 mg
- E1 (Iron): 41 mg
- E2 (Iodine): 4.1 mg
- E4 (Copper): 13 mg
- E5 (Manganese): 54 mg
- E6 (Zinc): 135 mg
- E8 (Selenium): 0.09 mg
- L-carnitine: 300 mg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (0.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 0.1/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immune system support (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Muscle & bone development (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Digestive health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Rottweiler Puppy
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.