Rawr Beef & sardines

Dry Extruded · completeHigh meat

Beef & sardines
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Rawr Beef & sardines a good dog food?

We score it 52/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete extruded dry food for dogs of all life stages, with beef muscle meat, sardines and beef tripe as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 67% of the dry matter (52% as fed).
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.
  • High in protein: 50% protein on a dry-matter basis.

Why you might not

  • High in fat: 37% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef muscle meat
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists sardines
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
  • You are limiting fat: 37.1% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 48% · Fat 36%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein48%
Fat36%
Fibre3%
Moisture3%
Carbohydrates3%

Energy: 491.3 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (13)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 51.5%
  • veg 48.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Beef Muscle MeatBeef muscle meatmeat · good-10.0
2Whole SardinesSardinesmeat · good-9.6
3Beef TripeBeef Tripemeat · medium-9.2
4Beef LiverBeef Livermeat · good-8.8
5Beef KidneyBeef Kidneymeat · good-8.5
6PumpkinPumpkinveg · good-8.1
7Green AppleApplesveg · good-7.7
8CauliflowerCauliflowerveg · good-7.3
9CabbageCabbageveg · good-6.9
10BroccoliBroccoliveg · good-6.5
11BlueberriesBlueberriesveg · good-6.2
12KaleKaleveg · good-5.8
13Egg YolkEggmeat · good-5.4
  1. 1. Beef Muscle Meat10.0% estimated
    Beef muscle meat · meat · good
  2. 2. Whole Sardines9.6% estimated
    Sardines · meat · good
  3. 3. Beef Tripe9.2% estimated
    Beef Tripe · meat · medium
  4. 4. Beef Liver8.8% estimated
    Beef Liver · meat · good
  5. 5. Beef Kidney8.5% estimated
    Beef Kidney · meat · good
  6. 6. Pumpkin8.1% estimated
    Pumpkin · veg · good
  7. 7. Green Apple7.7% estimated
    Apples · veg · good
  8. 8. Cauliflower7.3% estimated
    Cauliflower · veg · good
  9. 9. Cabbage6.9% estimated
    Cabbage · veg · good
  10. 10. Broccoli6.5% estimated
    Broccoli · veg · good
  11. 11. Blueberries6.2% estimated
    Blueberries · veg · good
  12. 12. Kale5.8% estimated
    Kale · veg · good
  13. 13. Egg Yolk5.4% estimated
    Egg · meat · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-10-06

Brand and contact: Rawr

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-10-06
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The score reached 52 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the result by -10.6, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +8.5. The processing format lowered the score by -6.7, and the vegetable and fruit content took away another -0.2.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.99.191+8.53
Vegetable share of dry matter33.5%-0.005-0.17
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.99.191+8.53
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.115+0.00
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter33.5%-0.005-0.17
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter0.0%-0.012+0.00
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Subtotal
52.0
Final score
52/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v352/100current
v263/100
v183/100
v1.984/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein4849.5 (band 22.79226804123711 to 40%)100
Fat3637.1 (band 6.96430412371134 to 20%)100
Fibre33.1 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Energy (kcal/100g)491.3506.550

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Portion-control flag: 491.3 kcal/100g as fed with fat at 37.1% dry matter, above the reference band. High-energy foods need smaller portions.

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
100% from Australia (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Grass-fed Australian beef is rich in iron, calcium and B vitamins and contains essential amino acids (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Sardines are rich in Omega-3 fatty acids, selenium and CoQ10 (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Great for healthy skin and coat (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Suitable for all life stages (on pack)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Beef & sardines

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Rawr

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.