Pointer Pet Foods Big Bite Chicken Biscuits

Treat · complementary

Big Bite Chicken Biscuits
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is Pointer Pet Foods Big Bite Chicken Biscuits a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

Complementary baked dry treats for adult dogs, with cereals, meat and animal derivatives and chicken as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

96% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Low in fat for its format: 9% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
  • 3 poor-graded ingredients make up about 74% of the recipe.
  • Low in protein: 19% protein on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
  • You need more protein than this: 19.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 5 ingredients.
  • Uses generic terms (Chicken): the specific animal source is not stated.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints no ingredient quantities.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 19% · Fat 9%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein19%
Fat9%
Fibre3.50%
Ash12.50%

Energy: 337 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

Feed at any time as a treat or reward. Adjust as necessary to keep your dog in a lean, active condition.

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (5)96% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 29.8%
  • carb 29.5%
  • supplement 22.2%
  • oil 18.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1CerealsCerealscarb · poor-25.0
2Meat and Animal DerivativesMeat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor-22.5
3chicken minChickenmeat · medium-20.0
4MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-17.5
5Oils and FatsOils and Fatsoil · poor-15.0
  1. 1. Cereals25.0% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  2. 2. Meat and Animal Derivatives22.5% estimated
  3. 3. chicken min20.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  4. 4. Minerals17.5% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  5. 5. Oils and Fats15.0% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-02

Brand and contact: Pointer Pet Foods
Pointer Pet Foods logo
Phone
0800 098 8057
Address
Pointer Pet Products, Customer Services Dept, Fold Hill Foods, Old Leake, Boston, Lincs, PE22 9RJ

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-02

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews

3 reviews on this product · 5.0/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.69.191-5.13
Meat share of dry matter1.5%0.096+0.15
Carb share of dry matter35.6%-0.115-4.10
Oil share of dry matter25.0%-0.092-2.30
Supplement share of dry matter27.9%-0.012-0.34
Recipe graded poor73.8%-0.065-4.80
Poor-quality meat in recipe25.8%-0.179-4.62
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient29.5%0.060+1.77
Undeclared quantities96.0%-0.106-10.14
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-2.070.222-0.46
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Bakedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.69.191-5.13
Meat share of dry matter1.5%0.096+0.15
Carb share of dry matter35.6%-0.115-4.10
Oil share of dry matter25.0%-0.092-2.30
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter27.9%-0.012-0.34
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor73.8%-0.065-4.80
Poor-quality meat in recipe25.8%-0.179-4.62
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient29.5%0.060+1.77
Undeclared quantities96.0%-0.106-10.14
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-2.070.222-0.46
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Subtotal
21.6
Final score
22/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v322/100current
v230/100
v129/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (4% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)0.8/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
perfect for helping to remove plaque and keeping breath fresh too (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
with fresh chicken (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
chicken min. 4% (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
no added artificial colours, flavours or preservatives (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from Pointer Pet Foods

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.