Pure Pet Food Chicken Renal Dog Food
Dry Air Dried complete Clear label
Is Pure Pet Food Chicken Renal Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 73/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 73 out of 100 based on our assessment. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.7, while the processing format contributed +9.3. Furthermore, printing percentages on the label added +3.2. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the overall score by -10.4.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
79% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe73
- Nutritionallow84
- Transparency54
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete air-dried food for dogs of all life stages, with potatoes, rice and dried chicken protein as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Scores 73, in the top quarter of dry foods we track.
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Single named animal protein: chicken.
Why you might not
- Low in protein: 14% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 14%
- Fat
- 12%
- Fibre
- 4%
- Ash
- 6.50%
Energy: 364 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 15000IU; Vitamin D3 1000IU; Vitamin E 90mg; Taurine 750mg; Zinc (as zinc sulphate monohydrate) 100mg; Iron (as iron (II) sulphate monohydrate) 80mg; Manganese (as manganous sulphate monohydrate) 25mg; Copper (as copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate) 10mg; Iodine (as calcium iodate, anhydrous) 2mg; Selenium (as sodium selenite) 0.05mg
Feeding guide
Use the online calculator to determine the feeding guide based on weight, age, activity level, and condition.
Reviews
Trustpilot: 4.6/5 · 16,355 reviews
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
- You need more protein than this: 14.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (12)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dried Potato | Potatoes | carb | medium | - | 16.6 |
| 2 | Brown Rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb | medium | - | 15.2 |
| 3 | Dehydrated Chicken (10%) | Dried chicken protein | meat | good | 10 | 10.0 |
| 4 | Dried Carrot (5%) | Carrots | veg | good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 5 | Dried Peas (5%) | Peas | veg | good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 6 | Rapeseed Oil | Rapeseed oil | oil | good | - | 13.9 |
| 7 | Linseed | Linseed | veg | good | - | 12.5 |
| 8 | Dried Vegetable Stock | Vegetable Stock | other | medium | - | 11.1 |
| 9 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 9.7 |
| 10 | Dried Apple (0.5%) | Apples | veg | good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 11 | Chicory Extract (0.35%) | Chicory Root Extract | fibre | good | 0.35 | 0.3 |
| 12 | Dried Algae (0.15%) | Seaweed | veg | good | 0.15 | 0.1 |
Brand
- Contact page
- www.purepetfood.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.purepetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.915 | +7.73 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 11.1% | 0.116 | +1.28 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 26.3% | -0.113 | -2.96 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 13.2% | -0.088 | -1.16 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 31.0% | -0.002 | -0.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 17.5% | -0.009 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.6% | -0.371 | -0.21 |
| Undeclared quantities | 79.2% | -0.131 | -10.36 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 11.1 | -0.073 | -0.81 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | yes | 9.320 | +9.32 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.915 | +7.73 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 11.1% | 0.116 | +1.28 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 26.3% | -0.113 | -2.96 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 13.2% | -0.088 | -1.16 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 31.0% | -0.002 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 17.5% | -0.009 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.6% | -0.371 | -0.21 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.045 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.868 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.056 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 79.2% | -0.131 | -10.36 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 11.1 | -0.073 | -0.81 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.236 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | yes | 9.320 | +9.32 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.996 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.10
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 73.3
- Final score
- 73/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 73/100 | current |
| v1 | 75/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 14 | 15.7 (band 18 to 40%) | 61.2 |
| Fat | 12 | 13.5 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 4 | 4.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 364 | 409 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 11% from the food type.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (20.8% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 4.2/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| Complete & balanced (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Food for dogs with kidney disease (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally tasty (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Pure Pet Food
Alternatives to Chicken Renal Dog Food
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.