Our verdict
Is ProDog Raw Duck Complete a good dog food?
We score it 91/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete raw food for adult dogs, with duck, green vegetables and carrots as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 51.8% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 12.50% · Fat 15.70%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 12.50% |
| Fat | 15.70% |
| Fibre | 0.80% |
| Ash | 3.50% |
| Moisture | 69.70% |
| Calcium | 0.73% |
| Phosphorus | 0.46% |
| Sodium | 0.10% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Keep raw dog food frozen until use
Feeding guide
Feeding amounts vary dependent on your dog’s age Age (Weeks) Amount to Feed 7-10 8-10% of body weight 10-16 7-8% of body weight 16-20 6-7% of body weight 20-24 5-6% of body weight 24-36 4-5% of body weight 36-56 3-4% of body weight 56-68 2.5-3.5% of body weight 68+ (Adult) 2-3% of ideal body weight Use our raw dog food calculator to help with feeding quantity calculations. Enter dog 's details into raw food calculator: 1. Lifestage: Adult dog Puppy 2. Dog dietary goals: 2. Puppy age in weeks Select Lose weight Maintain weight Gain weight Select 7-10 weeks old 10-16 weeks old 16-20 weeks old 20-24 week
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (7)7 of 7 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- meat 80.0%
- veg 19.0%
- oil 0.5%
- carb 0.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80% British Duck Meat | Duck | meat · medium | 80 | 80.0 |
| 2 | 10% green veg | Green Vegetables | veg · medium | 10 | 10.0 |
| 3 | 7.5% carrots | Carrots | veg · good | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 4 | 1% blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 5 | 0.5% Wheatgrass | Wheatgrass | carb · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 6 | 0.5% Irish sea kelp | Kelp | veg · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 7 | 0.5% Atlantic salmon oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
- 1. 80% British Duck Meat80% declared80.0% estimated
- 2. 10% green veg10% declared10.0% estimated
- 3. 7.5% carrots7.5% declared7.5% estimated
- 4. 1% blueberries1% declared1.0% estimated
- 5. 0.5% Wheatgrass0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 6. 0.5% Irish sea kelp0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 7. 0.5% Atlantic salmon oil0.5% declared0.5% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: ProDog Raw
- Website
- https://www.prodograw.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01278 556155
- Address
- Unit J8, Oaktree Business Park, Bristol Road, Edithmead, Highbridge, TA9 4HA
- Contact page
- www.prodograw.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.prodograw.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score came in at 91 out of 100. The meat content contributed +8.1 points and the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.1 points. On the other hand, the carbohydrate content pulled the score down by -0.2 points, and the oil and fat content reduced it by a further -0.2 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.06 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 84.3% | 0.096 | +8.10 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 1.7% | -0.115 | -0.19 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.092 | -0.17 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.1% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.06 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 84.3% | 0.096 | +8.10 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 1.7% | -0.115 | -0.19 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.092 | -0.17 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.1% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 91.5
- Final score
- 91/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12.5 | 41.3 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 15.7 | 51.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.8 | 2.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 98.5 |
| Calcium | 0.73 | 2.4 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.46 | 1.5 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Sodium | 0.1 | 0.3 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.6 | 1.6 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 85); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Low in calories but high in fibre, vitamin C, vitamin K, manganese, and powerful antioxidants that help combat oxidative stress." — the declared label says otherwise on high fibre.
Consistent with the label
- "Duck is a nutrient-dense protein, naturally high in healthy fats to support sustained energy" — supported by the declared high fat data.
11 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| packed with essential amino acids, iron, choline, and a powerful lineup of vitamins including A, B12, B3, B2, and B1 to support overall vitality and immune health. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ground bone adds natural collagen and glucosamine to promote strong bones and flexible joints, supporting long-term mobility and joint care. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports eye health, immune resilience, and healthy digestion. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Iodine aids healthy thyroid, pituitary, and adrenal function, while its anti-inflammatory properties support gut health, skin condition, and a shiny coat. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ideal for supporting metabolism, immunity, and cellular health. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no fillers, no nasties, just full-on natural flavour and function. (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nothing artificial. Nothing unnecessary. (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| naturally rich in iodine, protein, iron, magnesium, and Omega-3 fatty acids. (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Duck is a nutrient-dense protein, naturally high in healthy fats to support sustained energy (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally high in Omega-3 fatty acids (EPA & DHA), this premium oil supports joint health, reduces inflammation, nourishes internal organs, and promotes soft, shiny coats. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Duck Complete recipe is made with premium, higher-welfare duck and ground duck bone, sourced from British Farm Assurance certified farms. (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low in calories but high in fibre, vitamin C, vitamin K, manganese, and powerful antioxidants that help combat oxidative stress. (on page) | High/low level | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| rich in vitamin A, iron, magnesium, calcium and amino acids, plus antioxidants like glutathione and vitamins C and E to support immune health. (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Duck Complete
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.