ProDog Raw Animotics Probiotic Paste
Supplement · complementary
Our verdict
Is ProDog Raw Animotics Probiotic Paste a good dog food?
This is a supplement, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a supplement should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.
Complementary supplement for dogs of all life stages, with yeast, melon and probiotic as the main ingredients.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 3% · Fat 0.30%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 3% |
| Fat | 0.30% |
| Fibre | 0.10% |
| Ash | 0.70% |
| Moisture | 85.30% |
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Technological additives
E.Faecium NCIMB 10415 2 x 10^10 CFU
Ingredients (8)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 85.0%
- veg 15.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yang Nutritional Yeasts | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 16.0 |
| 2 | Melon Pulp | Melon | veg · good | - | 15.0 |
| 3 | Beneficial Bacteria 4 strains | Probiotic | supplement · good | - | 14.0 |
| 4 | Tydnalised-L | Tyndallised Lactobacillus | supplement · medium | - | 13.0 |
| 5 | Acidophilus 6.75 x 1011 CF L | Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus Fermentation Product | supplement · good | - | 12.0 |
| 6 | Casei 6.75 x 1011 CFU L | Lactobacillus casei | supplement · good | - | 11.0 |
| 7 | Plantarum 6.75 x 1011 CFU | Lactobacillus plantarum | supplement · good | - | 10.0 |
| 8 | Faecium NCIMB 10415 2 x 1010 CFU | Enterococcus Faecium | supplement · good | - | 9.0 |
- 1. Yang Nutritional Yeasts16.0% estimated
- 2. Melon Pulp15.0% estimated
- 3. Beneficial Bacteria 4 strains14.0% estimated
- 4. Tydnalised-L13.0% estimated
- 5. Acidophilus 6.75 x 1011 CF L12.0% estimated
- 6. Casei 6.75 x 1011 CFU L11.0% estimated
- 7. Plantarum 6.75 x 1011 CFU10.0% estimated
- 8. Faecium NCIMB 10415 2 x 1010 CFU9.0% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: ProDog Raw
- Website
- https://www.prodograw.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01278 556155
- Address
- Unit J8, Oaktree Business Park, Bristol Road, Edithmead, Highbridge, TA9 4HA
- Contact page
- www.prodograw.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Product page
- www.prodograw.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.69 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.8% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 97.2% | -0.012 | -1.19 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.69 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.8% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 97.2% | -0.012 | -1.19 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 51.1
- Final score
- 51/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| delivering multiple strains of highly beneficial bacteria (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| help maintain a balanced gut environment (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| specifically designed to aid optimal gut health and effective digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| If your dog’s gut is sensitive to dietary change, you can use this product to help them switch to raw dog food (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| providing multiple strains of bacteria to support the microbiome for dogs and cats (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| A high strength product (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Animotics is the UK’s first true dog PRO-biotic NOT containing PRE-biotics (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| to truly target a model microbiome for dogs and cats (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Containing multiple strains of beneficial bacteria and antioxidants (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| designed by one of Europe and the UK’s leading natural dog food formulators, Nutritionist Bianca Major (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Free From Added Sugars or E Numbers (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Microbiome Health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Maintaining a healthy balance of friendly bacteria is vital to overall health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| high-strength organic (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.