Pro Plan Large Robust Puppy Healthy Start Chicken
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Pro Plan Large Robust Puppy Healthy Start Chicken a good dog food?
We score it 34/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete extruded dry food for puppies, with chicken, dehydrated poultry proteins and rice as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
67% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 29% · Fat 15%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 29% |
| Fat | 15% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Ash | 7.50% |
Energy: 382 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Feeding amounts vary by puppy age (1.5-24 months), expected adult body weight (25-70 kg), and gestation/lactation status. Gradual introduction during weaning; fresh water available at all times; adjust for activity and condition.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vit A: 26000 IU/kg; Vit D3: 870 IU/kg; Vit E: 200 mg/kg; Vit C: 120 mg/kg; Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate: Fe 110 mg/kg; Calcium iodate anhydrous: I 1.7 mg/kg; Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate: Cu 12 mg/kg; Manganous sulphate monohydrate: Mn 42 mg/kg; Zinc sulphate monohydrate: Zn 100 mg/kg; Sodium selenite: Se 0.12 mg/kg
Technological additives
Tocopherol extracts from vegetable oils: 33 mg/kg
Ingredients (16)67% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 47.9%
- meat 33.7%
- oil 9.3%
- fibre 4.9%
- supplement 4.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High quality chicken (including back and chest) (18%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 18 | 18.0 |
| 2 | Dried poultry protein | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | - | 6.7 |
| 3 | Rice (15%) | Rice - white | carb · medium | 15 | 15.0 |
| 4 | Wheat | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 6.4 |
| 5 | Soya meal | Soya | carb · poor | - | 6.2 |
| 6 | Corn | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 5.9 |
| 7 | Animal fats | Unspecified Animal Fats and Oils | oil · poor | - | 5.7 |
| 8 | Wheat middlings | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 5.4 |
| 9 | Digest | Digest | meat · poor | - | 5.1 |
| 10 | Dried beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 4.9 |
| 11 | Corn protein meal | Maize gluten | carb · poor | - | 4.6 |
| 12 | Wheat gluten | Wheat Gluten | carb · poor | - | 4.4 |
| 13 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 14 | Dried egg | Dried Egg | meat · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 15 | Fish oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 3.6 |
| 16 | Dried colostrum (0.1%) | Colostrum | supplement · medium | 0.1 | 0.1 |
- 1. High quality chicken (including back and chest) (18%)18% declared18.0% estimated
- 2. Dried poultry protein6.7% estimated
- 3. Rice (15%)15% declared15.0% estimated
- 4. Wheat6.4% estimated
- 5. Soya meal6.2% estimated
- 6. Corn5.9% estimated
- 7. Animal fats5.7% estimated
- 8. Wheat middlings5.4% estimated
- 9. Digest5.1% estimated
- 10. Dried beet pulp4.9% estimated
- 11. Corn protein meal4.6% estimated
- 12. Wheat gluten4.4% estimated
- 13. Minerals4.1% estimated
- 14. Dried egg3.9% estimated
- 15. Fish oil3.6% estimated
- 16. Dried colostrum (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12
Brand and contact: Pro Plan
- Phone
- 0800 212 161
- Contact page
- www.purina.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-12
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.purina.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 1.8/5 · 628 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score came in at 34 out of 100, after several negative factors weighed against the product. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -7.1 points, while the processing format took off -6.7. The carbohydrate content reduced the score by -6.4, and lower-quality ingredients cost a further -2.5 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.1 | 9.191 | -0.59 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 6.6% | 0.096 | +0.64 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 55.8% | -0.115 | -6.42 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.1% | -0.092 | -1.11 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.1% | -0.012 | -0.06 |
| Recipe graded poor | 37.8% | -0.065 | -2.46 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 5.1% | -0.179 | -0.92 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 7 | -0.876 | -6.13 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.4% | 0.060 | +0.39 |
| Undeclared quantities | 66.9% | -0.106 | -7.06 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Additive penalty | -0.17 | 0.222 | -0.04 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.1 | 9.191 | -0.59 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 6.6% | 0.096 | +0.64 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 55.8% | -0.115 | -6.42 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.1% | -0.092 | -1.11 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.1% | -0.012 | -0.06 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 37.8% | -0.065 | -2.46 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 5.1% | -0.179 | -0.92 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 7 | -0.876 | -6.13 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.4% | 0.060 | +0.39 |
| Undeclared quantities | 66.9% | -0.106 | -7.06 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.17 | 0.222 | -0.04 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 33.5
- Final score
- 34/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 29 | 32 | 100 |
| Fat | 15 | 16.6 | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 382 | 422.1 | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
- Vit A: 26000 IU/kg
- Vit D3: 870 IU/kg
- Vit E: 200 mg/kg
- Vit C: 120 mg/kg
- Iron (II) sulphate monohydrate: Fe 110 mg/kg
- Calcium iodate anhydrous: I 1.7 mg/kg
- Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate: Cu 12 mg/kg
- Manganous sulphate monohydrate: Mn 42 mg/kg
- Zinc sulphate monohydrate: Zn 100 mg/kg
- Sodium selenite: Se 0.12 mg/kg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (33.1% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 6.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "High Protein" — the declared label says otherwise on high protein.
9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colostrum to help support natural defences (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps promote healthy growth and long-term health (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps support healthy joints (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Adapted for Large Robust breeds (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| helps support puppies' immune response up to 50% more (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| helps to optimise the balance of the gut microflora, helping minimise the incidence of loose stools (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| specific levels of omega-3 fatty acids (0.3%) to help support healthy teeth and gums (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High Protein (on pack) | High/low level | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Chicken as No1 ingredient (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Science based nutrition with no added colourants (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Large Robust Puppy Healthy Start Chicken
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.