veterinary diet
This is a medical nutrition decision. Speak to your vet.
This is a veterinary diet product: a "dietetic" feed designed for a particular nutritional purpose and intended for use under veterinary direction. The score and figures below are readings of the label, the same as for any other food: they can't tell you whether this product is right for your dog.
Pro Plan EN Gastrointestinal Wet Dog Food
Wet Pate · completeveterinary diet
Our verdict
Is Pro Plan EN Gastrointestinal Wet Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 37/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with meat and animal derivatives, cereals and egg as the main ingredients.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids turkey: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 8.90% · Fat 5%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 8.90% |
| Fat | 5% |
| Fibre | 0.80% |
| Ash | 2.10% |
| Moisture | 72.10% |
Energy: 116 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
The recommended period of use is initially up to 12 weeks but this diet is suitable for long-term use where appropriate. It is recommended that a veterinarian’s opinion be sought before use. Clean, fresh drinking water should always be available. Depending on the individual condition, a gradual introduction of the new diet over a few days is usually recommended. Feeding small quantities of food several times a day helps to optimise digestion and absorption. Daily feeding quantities: 2.5 kg: 1/2 can; 5 kg: 1 can; 10 kg: 1+1/2 cans; 15 kg: 1+3/4 cans; 25 kg: 2+2/3 cans; 35 kg: 3+1/4 cans; 45 kg: 3+3/4 cans; 70 kg: 5+1/4 cans.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 1500 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 210 IU/kg; Iron 14 mg/kg; Iodine 0.55 mg/kg; Copper 1.3 mg/kg; Manganese 2.5 mg/kg; Zinc 26 mg/kg; Taurine 650 mg/kg
Ingredients (10)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 44.9%
- carb 17.6%
- supplement 10.2%
- oil 9.6%
- other 9.1%
- unknown 8.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meat and animal derivatives | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | - | 12.9 |
| 2 | Cereals | Cereals | carb · poor | - | 12.3 |
| 3 | Eggs and egg derivatives | Egg | meat · good | - | 11.6 |
| 4 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 11.0 |
| 5 | Oils and fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 10.3 |
| 6 | Derivatives of vegetable origin | Vegetable By-Products | other · poor | - | 9.7 |
| 7 | Pork heart | Pork (heart) | meat · good | - | 9.0 |
| 8 | Poultry liver and heart | Liver | meat · good | - | 8.4 |
| 9 | Egg powder | Dried Whole Egg | meat · good | - | 7.7 |
| 10 | Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 7.1 |
- 1. Meat and animal derivatives12.9% estimated
- 2. Cereals12.3% estimated
- 3. Eggs and egg derivatives11.6% estimated
- 4. Minerals11.0% estimated
- 5. Oils and fats10.3% estimated
- 6. Derivatives of vegetable origin9.7% estimated
- 7. Pork heart9.0% estimated
- 8. Poultry liver and heart8.4% estimated
- 9. Egg powder7.7% estimated
- 10. Rice7.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12
Brand and contact: Pro Plan
- Phone
- 0800 212 161
- Contact page
- www.purina.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-12
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.purina.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 1.8/5 · 628 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score for this food comes in at 37 out of 100, where higher is better. Ingredients without printed percentages dragged the score down by -10.6 points, as buyers cannot judge how much of each is present. The carbohydrate content reduced the score by -3 points, the remaining ingredients contributed -2.8 points, and lower-quality ingredients brought it down by a further -2.7 points. This is a general explanation of how the score works, not veterinary advice. For any health condition, food choice is a decision for your vet.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.1 | 9.191 | -1.18 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 25.8% | -0.115 | -2.97 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.092 | -1.46 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.5% | -0.012 | -0.19 |
| Other share of dry matter | 7.5% | -0.375 | -2.83 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 7.1% | -0.027 | -0.19 |
| Recipe graded poor | 41.7% | -0.065 | -2.71 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 11.8% | -0.179 | -2.10 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 11.8% | 0.060 | +0.71 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -0.94 | 0.222 | -0.21 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.1 | 9.191 | -1.18 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 25.8% | -0.115 | -2.97 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.092 | -1.46 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.5% | -0.012 | -0.19 |
| Other share of dry matter | 7.5% | -0.375 | -2.83 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 7.1% | -0.027 | -0.19 |
| Recipe graded poor | 41.7% | -0.065 | -2.71 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 11.8% | -0.179 | -2.10 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 11.8% | 0.060 | +0.71 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.94 | 0.222 | -0.21 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 36.9
- Final score
- 37/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 8.9 | 31.9 (band 18.709677419354836 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5 | 17.9 (band 5.7168458781361995 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.8 | 2.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 116 | 415.8 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 1500 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 210 IU/kg
- Iron 14 mg/kg
- Iodine 0.55 mg/kg
- Copper 1.3 mg/kg
- Manganese 2.5 mg/kg
- Zinc 26 mg/kg
- Taurine 650 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Low fat level to help minimise fat maldigestion" — the declared label says otherwise on low fat.
3 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Easy to digest ingredients to help reduce workload of the compromised gut (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| With a special fat source (coconut oil) high in Medium Chain Fatty Acids (MCFA) for easy gut absorption (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete dietetic pet food for adult dogs, highly digestible, low fibre formulation for reduction of intestinal absorptive disorders, compensation for maldigestion and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low fat level to help minimise fat maldigestion (on page) | High/low level | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.