Our verdict
Is Primal Spirit Iberian Ancestral Grassland Salchicha a good dog food?
We score it 57/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with pork, kidney and pork liver as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: pork
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
- You are limiting fat: 32.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 13.80% · Fat 11.60%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 13.80% |
| Fat | 11.60% |
| Fibre | 1.20% |
| Ash | 2.40% |
| Moisture | 63.80% |
Energy: 188.4 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Almacene el producto en un lugar fresco y seco, y protegido de la luz solar.
Feeding guide
Consulte la tabla de necesidades diarias de alimento como punto de referencia, variando la cantidad de alimento según la edad, nivel de actividad física, peso o raza.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamina A (3a672a) 7954 IU/Kg; Vitamina D3 (3a671) 509 IU/Kg; Vitamina E (3a700) 159 IU/Kg; 3b503 Mn 13mg/kg; b103 Fe 29mg/kg; 3b405 Cu 2.7mg/kg; 3b603 Zn 44mg/kg; 3b201 I 0.6mg/kg
Technological additives
Conservantes y antioxidantes
Ingredients (9)17% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- unknown 83.0%
- carb 8.1%
- supplement 5.5%
- veg 3.4%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74% fresh pork | Pork | meat · medium | 74 | 74.0 |
| 2 | 5% kidneys | Kidney | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 3 | 4% liver | Pork Liver | meat · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 4 | water | Water | other | - | 3.6 |
| 5 | cereals | Cereals | carb · poor | - | 3.3 |
| 6 | soy protein | Soy Protein | carb · poor | - | 3.0 |
| 7 | spices | Spices | veg · medium | - | 2.7 |
| 8 | tocopherol | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 9 | yucca extract | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 2.1 |
- 1. 74% fresh pork74% declared74.0% estimated
- 2. 5% kidneys5% declared5.0% estimated
- 3. 4% liver4% declared4.0% estimated
- 4. water3.6% estimated
- 5. cereals3.3% estimated
- 6. soy protein3.0% estimated
- 7. spices2.7% estimated
- 8. tocopherol2.4% estimated
- 9. yucca extract2.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-09
Brand and contact: Primal Spirit
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-09
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.aspiritpetfood.store
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
3,205 reviews on this product · 4.9/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The recipe score is 57. Complete recipe contributed +2.3. Unclassified ingredients contributed -2. Printed percentages contributed +2. Undeclared ingredient shares contributed -1.8.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.0 | 9.191 | -0.39 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 13.1% | -0.115 | -1.51 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 9.4% | -0.012 | -0.11 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 76.6% | -0.027 | -2.03 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.1% | -0.065 | -0.52 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.3% | 0.060 | +0.26 |
| Undeclared quantities | 17.0% | -0.106 | -1.79 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.0 | 9.191 | -0.39 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 13.1% | -0.115 | -1.51 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.005 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 9.4% | -0.012 | -0.11 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 76.6% | -0.027 | -2.03 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.1% | -0.065 | -0.52 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.3% | 0.060 | +0.26 |
| Undeclared quantities | 17.0% | -0.106 | -1.79 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 57.2
- Final score
- 57/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 13.8 | 38.1 (band 23.419889502762423 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 11.6 | 32 (band 7.1560773480662965 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.2 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 188.4 | 520.4 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamina A (3a672a) 7954 IU/Kg
- Vitamina D3 (3a671) 509 IU/Kg
- Vitamina E (3a700) 159 IU/Kg
- 3b503 Mn 13mg/kg
- b103 Fe 29mg/kg
- 3b405 Cu 2.7mg/kg
- 3b603 Zn 44mg/kg
- 3b201 I 0.6mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (83% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 16.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 83% cerdo fresco (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Iberian Ancestral Grassland Salchicha
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.