Primal Pet Foods Power Greens Recipe
Topper · complementary
Our verdict
Is Primal Pet Foods Power Greens Recipe a good dog food?
This is a topper, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a topper should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.
Complementary frozen fresh food topper for dogs of all life stages, with kale, cooking broth and celery seeds as the main ingredients.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids pork: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists sorghum
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
- You need more protein than this: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
What the label tells us
- The label lists 19 ingredients.
- Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
- Prints no ingredient quantities.
Why is this treat not scored?
Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.
What should I look for on a treat label?
A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.
These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 2% · Fat 2%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 2% |
| Fat | 2% |
| Fibre | 2% |
| Ash | 0.80% |
| Moisture | 90% |
| Carbohydrates | 4% |
| Calcium | 0.09% |
| Phosphorus | 0.04% |
| Sodium | 0.06% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Fresh Toppers are sold in a frozen state and should be stored in the freezer until ready to use.
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (19)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 54.1%
- supplement 13.1%
- oil 12.2%
- other 6.7%
- additive 5.4%
- fibre 4.9%
- carb 3.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Organic Kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 6.9 |
| 2 | Pork Bone Broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 6.7 |
| 3 | Organic Celery | Celery Seeds | veg · good | - | 6.5 |
| 4 | Organic Chia Seeds | Chia Seeds | veg · good | - | 6.4 |
| 5 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 6.2 |
| 6 | Organic Coconut Oil | Coconut Oil | oil · medium | - | 6.0 |
| 7 | Organic Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 5.8 |
| 8 | Organic Cilantro | Coriander | veg · good | - | 5.6 |
| 9 | Organic Apple Cider Vinegar | Apple Cider Vinegar | additive · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 10 | Organic Shitake Mushrooms | Mushrooms | veg · good | - | 5.3 |
| 11 | Organic Maitake Mushrooms | Maitake Mushroom | veg · good | - | 5.1 |
| 12 | Inulin | Inulin | fibre · good | - | 4.9 |
| 13 | Organic Turmeric | Turmeric | veg · good | - | 4.7 |
| 14 | Dried Lactococcus lactis fermentation product | Lactococcus lactis | supplement · good | - | 4.5 |
| 15 | Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation product | Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus Fermentation Product | supplement · good | - | 4.4 |
| 16 | Dried Enterococcus faecium fermentation product | Enterococcus Faecium | supplement · good | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | Organic Ginger | Ginger | veg · good | - | 4.0 |
| 18 | Organic Cinnamon | Cinnamon | veg · good | - | 3.8 |
| 19 | Organic Sorghum | Sorghum | carb · medium | - | 3.6 |
- 1. Organic Kale6.9% estimated
- 2. Pork Bone Broth6.7% estimated
- 3. Organic Celery6.5% estimated
- 4. Organic Chia Seeds6.4% estimated
- 5. Fish Oil6.2% estimated
- 6. Organic Coconut Oil6.0% estimated
- 7. Organic Parsley5.8% estimated
- 8. Organic Cilantro5.6% estimated
- 9. Organic Apple Cider Vinegar5.4% estimated
- 10. Organic Shitake Mushrooms5.3% estimated
- 11. Organic Maitake Mushrooms5.1% estimated
- 12. Inulin4.9% estimated
- 13. Organic Turmeric4.7% estimated
- 14. Dried Lactococcus lactis fermentation product4.5% estimated
- 15. Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation product4.4% estimated
- 16. Dried Enterococcus faecium fermentation product4.2% estimated
- 17. Organic Ginger4.0% estimated
- 18. Organic Cinnamon3.8% estimated
- 19. Organic Sorghum3.6% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22
Brand and contact: Primal Pet Foods
- Website
- https://primalpetfoods.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Product page
- www.primalpetfoods.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.58 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 5.4% | -0.115 | -0.62 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.3% | -0.092 | -1.87 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 37.6% | -0.005 | -0.19 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.3% | 0.163 | +1.35 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 20.3% | -0.012 | -0.25 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.6% | -0.375 | -0.21 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -6.53 | 0.222 | -1.45 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.58 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 5.4% | -0.115 | -0.62 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.3% | -0.092 | -1.87 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 37.6% | -0.005 | -0.19 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.3% | 0.163 | +1.35 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 20.3% | -0.012 | -0.25 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.6% | -0.375 | -0.21 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -6.53 | 0.222 | -1.45 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 54.6
- Final score
- 55/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.