Platinum Fit-Bits Relax

Treat · complementaryHigh meat

Fit-Bits Relax
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is Platinum Fit-Bits Relax a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

Complementary air-dried treats for adult dogs, with chicken, potatoes and salmon oil as the main ingredients.

How we score

27% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 53% of the dry matter (73% as fed).
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.
  • High in protein: 31% protein on a dry-matter basis.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 10 ingredients.
  • Uses generic terms (Chicken): the specific animal source is not stated.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints quantities for 1 ingredient.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 25% · Fat 11%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein25%
Fat11%
Fibre2.70%
Ash8.50%
Moisture20%
Calcium1.50%
Phosphorus1%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

For optimum effect: at least 3 x 3 Fit-Bits (1-6 kg body weight), 3 x 7 Fit-Bits (7-19 kg body weight), 3 x 10 Fit-Bits (20 kg+ body weight). Up to 30-40 bits per 10 kg body weight can be given throughout the day. Effect usually occurs after approx. 1-2 weeks.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

L-tryptophan 3000 mg/kg

Ingredients (10)27% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 73.0%
  • veg 10.7%
  • oil 7.1%
  • carb 3.9%
  • fibre 3.2%
  • supplement 2.1%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Fresh chicken meat (73%)Chickenmeat · medium7373.0
2potatoesPotatoescarb · medium-3.9
3salmon oil (omega-3)Salmon Oiloil · good-3.6
4flaxseed oil (omega-3)Linseed oiloil · good-3.4
5apple pulpApple Fibrefibre · medium-3.2
6chamomileChamomileveg · good-3.0
7hempDried Hempveg · good-2.8
8seaweed (chlorella)Seaweedveg · good-2.6
9valerianValerian Rootveg · medium-2.4
10beta glucansBeta-Glucanssupplement · good-2.1
  1. 1. Fresh chicken meat (73%)73% declared73.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  2. 2. potatoes3.9% estimated
    Potatoes · carb · medium
  3. 3. salmon oil (omega-3)3.6% estimated
    Salmon Oil · oil · good
  4. 4. flaxseed oil (omega-3)3.4% estimated
    Linseed oil · oil · good
  5. 5. apple pulp3.2% estimated
    Apple Fibre · fibre · medium
  6. 6. chamomile3.0% estimated
    Chamomile · veg · good
  7. 7. hemp2.8% estimated
    Dried Hemp · veg · good
  8. 8. seaweed (chlorella)2.6% estimated
    Seaweed · veg · good
  9. 9. valerian2.4% estimated
    Valerian Root · veg · medium
  10. 10. beta glucans2.1% estimated
    Beta-Glucans · supplement · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Platinum

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Product page
www.platinum.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 4.8/5 · 514 reviews

14 reviews on this product · 4.5/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.17
Meat share of dry matter52.6%0.096+5.04
Carb share of dry matter2.5%-0.115-0.29
Oil share of dry matter18.0%-0.092-1.66
Vegetable share of dry matter14.5%-0.005-0.07
Supplement share of dry matter5.1%-0.012-0.06
Undeclared quantities27.0%-0.106-2.85
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0833.786+36.49
Processing: Dry Air Driedyes6.331+6.33
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.17
Meat share of dry matter52.6%0.096+5.04
Carb share of dry matter2.5%-0.115-0.29
Oil share of dry matter18.0%-0.092-1.66
Vegetable share of dry matter14.5%-0.005-0.07
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter5.1%-0.012-0.06
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities27.0%-0.106-2.85
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0833.786+36.49
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedyes6.331+6.33
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.28
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
82.0
Final score
82/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v382/100current
v282/100
v171/100
v1.973/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (73% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)14.6/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Functional snack to support inner peace (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
For nervousness & stress (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Excellent for building muscle (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Quickly digestible (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Effectively absorbed (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Extra tasty (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
As nutritious as raw (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from Platinum

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.