Pero Gluten Free Low Calorie Salmon & Brown Rice

Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label

Gluten Free Low Calorie Salmon & Brown Rice
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Pero Gluten Free Low Calorie Salmon & Brown Rice a good dog food?

We score it 64/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with rice, salmon protein and fish meal as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 39% of the dry matter.
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon protein
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 24% · Fat 10%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein24%
Fat10%
Fibre3%
Ash6.50%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight. Once opened, store in an airtight container.

Feeding guide

Weight of Dog (KG) / Daily Feed (G): 1-5: 30-100; 5-10: 90-185; 10-20: 150-310; 20-30: 255-420; 30-40: 350-520; 40+: 450+

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 15,000 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 2,750 IU/kg; Vitamin E 100 mg/kg; Zinc (as Zinc Oxide) 100 mg/kg; Iron (as Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) 50 mg/kg; Manganese (as Manganese (II) Oxide) 20 mg/kg; Copper (as Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 15 mg/kg; Cupric Sulphate Pentahydrate 60 mg/kg; Iodine (as Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 2 mg/kg; Selenium (as Organic Selenium) 0.1 mg/kg

Technological additives

Antioxidants

Ingredients (14)22% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 48.1%
  • meat 39.2%
  • oil 5.0%
  • fibre 4.6%
  • supplement 3.1%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Brown Rice (40%)Rice - brown / whole graincarb · medium4040.0
2Salmon Meal (14%)Salmon Proteinmeat · good1414.0
3Fish Meal (8%)Fish Mealmeat · medium88.0
4Hydrolysed Salmon (11%Salmonmeat · good-11.0
5Beet PulpBeet Pulpfibre · medium-3.1
6Salmon Oil (5%)Salmon Oiloil · good55.0
7Sweet PotatoSweet Potatoescarb · good-3.0
8Flaked PotatoPotatoescarb · medium-2.8
9Chicken GravyChickenmeat · medium-2.6
10MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-2.4
11KrillKrillmeat · good-2.3
12GlucosamineGlucosaminesupplement · good-2.1
13Chondroitin SulphateChondroitinsupplement · good-1.9
14CranberryCranberriesveg · good-1.7
  1. 1. Brown Rice (40%)40% declared40.0% estimated
    Rice - brown / whole grain · carb · medium
  2. 2. Salmon Meal (14%)14% declared14.0% estimated
    Salmon Protein · meat · good
  3. 3. Fish Meal (8%)8% declared8.0% estimated
    Fish Meal · meat · medium
  4. 4. Hydrolysed Salmon (11%11.0% estimated
    Salmon · meat · good
  5. 5. Beet Pulp3.1% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  6. 6. Salmon Oil (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
    Salmon Oil · oil · good
  7. 7. Sweet Potato3.0% estimated
    Sweet Potatoes · carb · good
  8. 8. Flaked Potato2.8% estimated
    Potatoes · carb · medium
  9. 9. Chicken Gravy2.6% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  10. 10. Minerals2.4% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  11. 11. Krill2.3% estimated
    Krill · meat · good
  12. 12. Glucosamine2.1% estimated
    Glucosamine · supplement · good
  13. 13. Chondroitin Sulphate1.9% estimated
    Chondroitin · supplement · good
  14. 14. Cranberry1.7% estimated
    Cranberries · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Pero

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
pero-online.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 4.9/5 · 292 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves a total score of 64 out of 100 based on several key factors. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, and the carbohydrate content contributed -5.3 points. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.9 points, and the meat content contributed +3.6 points to the overall assessment.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.88
Meat share of dry matter37.7%0.096+3.62
Carb share of dry matter46.2%-0.115-5.32
Oil share of dry matter6.1%-0.092-0.57
Supplement share of dry matter3.5%-0.012-0.04
Undeclared quantities22.0%-0.106-2.32
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.88
Meat share of dry matter37.7%0.096+3.62
Carb share of dry matter46.2%-0.115-5.32
Oil share of dry matter6.1%-0.092-0.57
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter3.5%-0.012-0.04
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities22.0%-0.106-2.32
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
63.6
Final score
64/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v364/100current
v263/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2426.5 (band 18 to 40%)93.2
Fat1011 (band 5.5 to 20%)93
Fibre33.3 (band 0.5 to 5%)100

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 15,000 IU/kg
  • Vitamin D3 2,750 IU/kg
  • Vitamin E 100 mg/kg
  • Zinc (as Zinc Oxide) 100 mg/kg
  • Iron (as Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) 50 mg/kg
  • Manganese (as Manganese (II) Oxide) 20 mg/kg
  • Copper (as Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 15 mg/kg
  • Cupric Sulphate Pentahydrate 60 mg/kg
  • Iodine (as Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 2 mg/kg
  • Selenium (as Organic Selenium) 0.1 mg/kg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (78% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)15.6/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "Low in Fat" — the declared label says otherwise on low fat.

9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Gluten Free (on page)provenancenot checkableManufacturer assertion
Supports Healthy Joints (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Hypoallergenic (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Made with over 33% Fish (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Low in Fat (on page)High/low levelcontradictedManufacturer assertion
Made with All Natural Ingredients (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
complete, gluten-free dry dog food (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
naturally filled with Omega-3 which enhances coat appearance as well as aiding cognitive development (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
15% less fat than similar conventional recipes (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion
no artificial colours, flavours, or preservatives (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Gluten Free Low Calorie Salmon & Brown Rice

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Pero

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.