Pala Recipe 2 - Chicken and salmon
Dry Air Dried · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Pala Recipe 2 - Chicken and salmon a good dog food?
We score it 90/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete air-dried food for dogs of all life stages, with chicken, salmon and beetroot as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 43.2% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 37% · Fat 38%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 37% |
| Fat | 38% |
| Fibre | 2% |
| Ash | 8% |
| Moisture | 12% |
| Carbohydrates | 3% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 2.03% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 7.03% |
| Calcium | 1.41% |
| Phosphorus | 0.97% |
Energy: 463 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool, dry place. Keep bag closed after opening and consume within 2 weeks. For best hygiene, use a clean measuring cup or pour directly into your dog's bowl rather than handling the food by hand. Not for human consumption.
Feeding guide
5kg 65g; 10kg 110g; 15kg 149g; 20kg 184g; 25kg 218g; 35kg 281g; 40kg 311g
Additives declared on the label
Technological additives
natural tocopherols with rosemary extract
Ingredients (18)12% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 88.0%
- veg 8.0%
- additive 1.5%
- carb 0.9%
- oil 0.8%
- fibre 0.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken (74%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 74 | 74.0 |
| 2 | salmon (14%) | Salmon | meat · good | 14 | 14.0 |
| 3 | beetroot | Beetroot | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 4 | carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 0.9 |
| 5 | cabbage | Cabbage | veg · good | - | 0.9 |
| 6 | spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 0.9 |
| 7 | wheatgrass | Wheatgrass | carb · good | - | 0.9 |
| 8 | flaxseed oil | Linseed oil | oil · good | - | 0.8 |
| 9 | psyllium husk | Psyllium fibre | fibre · good | - | 0.8 |
| 10 | apple cider vinegar | Apple Cider Vinegar | additive · medium | - | 0.8 |
| 11 | natural tocopherols with rosemary extract | Tocopherols | additive · good | - | 0.7 |
| 12 | kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 0.7 |
| 13 | blueberry | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 0.7 |
| 14 | cranberry | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 0.6 |
| 15 | sea buckthorn | Sea Buckthorn | veg · good | - | 0.6 |
| 16 | oregano | Oregano | veg · good | - | 0.6 |
| 17 | thyme | Thyme | veg · good | - | 0.6 |
| 18 | turmeric and black pepper. | Black Pepper | veg · medium | - | 0.5 |
- 1. Chicken (74%)74% declared74.0% estimated
- 2. salmon (14%)14% declared14.0% estimated
- 3. beetroot1.0% estimated
- 4. carrot0.9% estimated
- 5. cabbage0.9% estimated
- 6. spinach0.9% estimated
- 7. wheatgrass0.9% estimated
- 8. flaxseed oil0.8% estimated
- 9. psyllium husk0.8% estimated
- 10. apple cider vinegar0.8% estimated
- 11. natural tocopherols with rosemary extract0.7% estimated
- 12. kelp0.7% estimated
- 13. blueberry0.7% estimated
- 14. cranberry0.6% estimated
- 15. sea buckthorn0.6% estimated
- 16. oregano0.6% estimated
- 17. thyme0.6% estimated
- 18. turmeric and black pepper.0.5% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-10-07
Brand and contact: Pala
- Website
- https://palapets.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-10-07
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- palapets.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score came in at 90 out of 100. The meat content contributed +7.9 points, with the processing format adding a further +6.3. The overall quality of the ingredient list boosted the score by +5.9, while being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.86 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 82.1% | 0.096 | +7.88 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 2.5% | -0.115 | -0.29 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.7% | -0.092 | -0.25 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.5% | 0.163 | +0.73 |
| Undeclared quantities | 12.0% | -0.106 | -1.27 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -1.80 | 0.222 | -0.40 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.08 | 33.786 | +36.49 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | yes | 6.331 | +6.33 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.86 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 82.1% | 0.096 | +7.88 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 2.5% | -0.115 | -0.29 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.7% | -0.092 | -0.25 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.5% | 0.163 | +0.73 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 12.0% | -0.106 | -1.27 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -1.80 | 0.222 | -0.40 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.08 | 33.786 | +36.49 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | yes | 6.331 | +6.33 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.28
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 90.2
- Final score
- 90/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 37 | 42 (band 23.67613636363637 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 38 | 43.2 (band 7.234375000000002 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2 | 2.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 93.6 |
| Calcium | 1.41 | 1.6 (band 0.6576704545454547 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.97 | 1.1 (band 0.5261363636363637 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 (band 1 to 2%) | 97.2 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 463 | 526.1 | 50 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Portion-control flag: 463 kcal/100g as fed with fat at 43.2% dry matter, above the reference band. High-energy foods need smaller portions.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (88% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 17.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| All natural raw dog food with the convenience of kibble (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No synthetic additives, supplements, flavours or preservatives (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Recipe with chicken (74%), salmon (14%), veggies, berries and natural boosters (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| supports muscle and tissue building, joint health, red blood cell formation, skin and coat health, and boosting the immune system (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Recipe 2 - Chicken and salmon
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.