Orygo Multi-Protein Complete Dog Food
Dry Cold Pressed · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Orygo Multi-Protein Complete Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 66/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete cold-pressed dry food for dogs of all life stages, with chicken, sardinella and mackerel as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists mackerel
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 29% · Fat 15%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 29% |
| Fat | 15% |
| Fibre | 2% |
| Ash | 7% |
| Moisture | 25% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.18% |
| Calcium | 1.30% |
| Phosphorus | 1.10% |
Energy: 330.7 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool, dry place that is shaded from sunlight
Feeding guide
A daily recommended food guide has been created which can be used for reference. Factors such as age, physical activity levels, weight and breed will need to be taken into consideration. Make sure that fresh and clean water is always available for your dog. Suitable for all dog breeds.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Iron 62 mg/kg; Glucosamine 3930 mg/kg; Taurine 2680 mg/kg
Ingredients (20)20 of 20 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- meat 81.0%
- carb 9.0%
- unknown 5.0%
- veg 2.8%
- other 1.5%
- supplement 0.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35% fresh chicken meat | Chicken | meat · medium | 35 | 35.0 |
| 2 | 5% Sardinella aurita | Sardinella | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 3 | 5% mackerel | Mackerel | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 4 | 5% horse mackerel | Horse Mackerel | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 5 | 5% sardine | Sardines | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 6 | 15% fresh pork | Pork | meat · medium | 15 | 15.0 |
| 7 | 10% fresh duck | Duck | meat · medium | 10 | 10.0 |
| 8 | 5% fresh pork liver | Pork Liver | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 9 | 9% hydrolysed starch | Hydrolysed Starch | carb · poor | 9 | 9.0 |
| 10 | 1.5% vegetable glycerine | Glycerine | other · medium | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 11 | 1% eggs | Egg | meat · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 12 | 1% Beta Vulgaris pulp | Beetroot | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 13 | 0.75% brewer's yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | 0.75 | 0.8 |
| 14 | 0.25% pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 15 | 0.25% banana | Banana | veg · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 16 | 0.25% pineapple | Pineapple | veg · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 17 | 0.25% cumin | Cumin | veg · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 18 | 0.25% sage | Sage | veg · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 19 | 0.25% ginger | Ginger | veg · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 20 | 0.25% turmeric | Turmeric | veg · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
- 1. 35% fresh chicken meat35% declared35.0% estimated
- 2. 5% Sardinella aurita5% declared5.0% estimated
- 3. 5% mackerel5% declared5.0% estimated
- 4. 5% horse mackerel5% declared5.0% estimated
- 5. 5% sardine5% declared5.0% estimated
- 6. 15% fresh pork15% declared15.0% estimated
- 7. 10% fresh duck10% declared10.0% estimated
- 8. 5% fresh pork liver5% declared5.0% estimated
- 9. 9% hydrolysed starch9% declared9.0% estimated
- 10. 1.5% vegetable glycerine1.5% declared1.5% estimated
- 11. 1% eggs1% declared1.0% estimated
- 12. 1% Beta Vulgaris pulp1% declared1.0% estimated
- 13. 0.75% brewer's yeast0.75% declared0.8% estimated
- 14. 0.25% pumpkin0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 15. 0.25% banana0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 16. 0.25% pineapple0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 17. 0.25% cumin0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 18. 0.25% sage0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 19. 0.25% ginger0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 20. 0.25% turmeric0.25% declared0.3% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Orygo
- Website
- https://sabrepetfood.co.uk/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- sabrepetfood.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score for this recipe is 66 out of 100. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, while the meat content contributed +6.1 points. The carbohydrate content contributed -2.6 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +2.04 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 63.9% | 0.096 | +6.13 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 22.8% | -0.115 | -2.63 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.012 | -0.02 |
| Other share of dry matter | 2.1% | -0.375 | -0.79 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 7.0% | -0.027 | -0.19 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.0% | -0.065 | -0.58 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.0% | 0.060 | +0.54 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +2.04 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 63.9% | 0.096 | +6.13 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 22.8% | -0.115 | -2.63 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.012 | -0.02 |
| Other share of dry matter | 2.1% | -0.375 | -0.79 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 7.0% | -0.027 | -0.19 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.0% | -0.065 | -0.58 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.0% | 0.060 | +0.54 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 65.6
- Final score
- 66/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 29 | 38.7 (band 19.842 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 15 | 20 (band 6.062833333333332 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2 | 2.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 98.9 |
| Calcium | 1.3 | 1.7 (band 0.5511666666666666 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.1 | 1.5 (band 0.4409333333333333 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 80.9 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 330.7 | 440.9 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 3 nutritional additives on the label
- Iron 62 mg/kg
- Glucosamine 3930 mg/kg
- Taurine 2680 mg/kg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · strong — 4 checkable claims: 4 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Complete Dog Food" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "Gluten Free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Made without cereals, gluten or meat flours" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Grain-free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| high nutritional values (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| for a shiny beautiful coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| healthy choice (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no added fat (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete Dog Food (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Gluten Free (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| All fats are from natural sources (meat and fish) (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made without cereals, gluten or meat flours (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| not extruded (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain-free (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Multi-Protein Complete Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.