Orygo Ham with Melon Complete Wet Canned Dog Food
Wet Pate complete Declared analysis sits below the FEDIAF minimum for calcium, phosphorus. High meat Clear label Full label
Is Orygo Ham with Melon Complete Wet Canned Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 81/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
The overall score for this recipe is 81 out of 100. The meat content contributed +8.7 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.9 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete gave the recipe +2.3 points, and printing percentages for most of the recipe provided a further +1 points.
- Recipe81
- Nutritionalmedium86
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencemoderate100
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with lung, stomach and pork liver as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Scores 81, in the top quarter of wet foods we track.
- Meat makes up an estimated 91% of the dry matter (93% as fed).
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
Why you might not
- High in fat: 33% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 12%
- Fat
- 8%
- Fibre
- 1.50%
- Ash
- 2.80%
- Moisture
- 75.50%
- Carbohydrates
- 0.20%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 0%
- Calcium
- 0.09%
- Phosphorus
- 0.07%
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Zinc Oxide 30 mg/kg; Glucosamine 200 mg/kg; Chondroitin Sulfate 200 mg/kg; Vitamin A 2500 IU/kg; Vitamin D 125 IU/kg; Vitamin E 15 IU/kg
Storage
Store in a cool, dry place that is shaded from sunlight. Once opened, it can be stored for up to 24 hours in refrigeration. Serve at room temperature.
Feeding guide
A daily recommended food guide has been created which can be used for reference, factors such as age, physical activity levels, weight and breed will need to be taken into consideration. It is recommended to divide the can into two doses. Make sure that fresh and clean water is always available for your dog.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: pork
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- You are limiting fat: 32.7% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (8)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24% Lung | Lung | meat | medium | 24 | 24.0 |
| 2 | 24% Stomach | Stomach | meat | medium | 24 | 24.0 |
| 3 | 5% Liver | Pork Liver | meat | good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 4 | 40% Ham | Ham | meat | medium | 40 | 40.0 |
| 5 | 4% Melon | Melon | veg | good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 6 | Gelatin | Gelatin | supplement | medium | - | 1.2 |
| 7 | Ground Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre | medium | - | 1.0 |
| 8 | Spices and Minerals. | Spices | veg | medium | - | 0.8 |
Brand
- Website
- https://sabrepetfood.co.uk/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- sabrepetfood.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-06. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.87 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 90.5% | 0.096 | +8.69 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.5% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 3.8% | -0.012 | -0.05 |
| Undeclared quantities | 3.0% | -0.106 | -0.32 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.87 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 90.5% | 0.096 | +8.69 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.5% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 3.8% | -0.012 | -0.05 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 3.0% | -0.106 | -0.32 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 81.1
- Final score
- 81/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12 | 49 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 8 | 32.7 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.5 | 6.1 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.09 | 0.4 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 51.4 |
| Phosphorus | 0.07 | 0.3 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 50 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.3 | 1.3 (band 1 to 2%) | 87.1 |
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
- Zinc Oxide 30 mg/kg
- Glucosamine 200 mg/kg
- Chondroitin Sulfate 200 mg/kg
- Vitamin A 2500 IU/kg
- Vitamin D 125 IU/kg
- Vitamin E 15 IU/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (97% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 19.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Grain-free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Formulated with a single animal protein" — supported by the declared single protein data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suitable for all dog breeds (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete Wet Canned Dog Food (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No artificial colours (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Suitable for adult dogs (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No added water (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain-free (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made from extremely high-quality ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated with a single animal protein (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Suitable for dogs aged 1+ (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Orygo
Alternatives to Ham with Melon Complete Wet Canned Dog Food
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.