Orygo Complete Dry Dog Food - Beef
Dry Cold Pressed · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Orygo Complete Dry Dog Food - Beef a good dog food?
We score it 70/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete cold-pressed dry food for dogs of all life stages, with beef, beef heart and beef lung as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists krill
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists millet
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 23% · Fat 12%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 23% |
| Fat | 12% |
| Fibre | 4% |
| Ash | 6% |
| Moisture | 6% |
| Calcium | 1.20% |
| Phosphorus | 1% |
Energy: 418.4 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool, dry, place shaded from sunlight.
Feeding guide
A daily recommended food guide has been created which can be used for reference, factors such as age, physical activity levels, weight and breed will need to be taken into consideration. Make sure that fresh and clean water is always available for your dog. Suitable for all dog breeds.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A (3a672a): 15,000 I.U/kg; Vitamin D3 (3a671): 1,500 I.U/kg; Vitamin E (3a700): 250 mg/kg; Vitamin K2: 1.37 mg/kg; Vitamin B1 (3a821): 13.2 mg/kg; Vitamin B2: 7.68 mg/kg; Niacin (3a314): 30 mg/kg; Vitamin B5 (3a841): 24.34 mg/kg; Vitamin B6 (3a831): 7.20 mg/kg; Vitamin B12: 72 mcg/kg; Biotin (3a880): 312 mcg/kg; Vitamin B9 (3a316): 1.20 mg/kg; Vitamin C (3a300): 60 mg/kg; Betaine (3a925): 300 mg/kg; Iron Sulfate Monohydrate: 84 mg/kg; Potassium Iodide (3b201); Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate: 4.80 mg/kg; Manganese Oxide: 57.60 mg/kg; Zinc Oxide (3b603): 90 mg/kg; Selenium Organic CNCM l-3399 (3b812): 0.18 mg/kg
Ingredients (11)11% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 69.7%
- veg 22.5%
- carb 5.6%
- oil 2.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42% beef meat | Beef | meat · medium | 42 | 42.0 |
| 2 | 6% beef heart | Beef Heart | meat · good | 6 | 6.0 |
| 3 | 6% beef lung | Beef lung | meat · medium | 6 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 3% beef tripe | Beef Tripe | meat · medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 5 | 3% beef liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 6 | 10% raw dried carrot | Carrots | veg · good | 10 | 10.0 |
| 7 | 9% raw dried apple | Apples | veg · good | 9 | 9.0 |
| 8 | 5% millet | Millet | carb · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 9 | 2% krill | Krill | meat · good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 10 | 2% coconut oil | Coconut Oil | oil · medium | 2 | 2.0 |
| 11 | 1% nettle | Nettles | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
- 1. 42% beef meat42% declared42.0% estimated
- 2. 6% beef heart6% declared6.0% estimated
- 3. 6% beef lung6% declared6.0% estimated
- 4. 3% beef tripe3% declared3.0% estimated
- 5. 3% beef liver3% declared3.0% estimated
- 6. 10% raw dried carrot10% declared10.0% estimated
- 7. 9% raw dried apple9% declared9.0% estimated
- 8. 5% millet5% declared5.0% estimated
- 9. 2% krill2% declared2.0% estimated
- 10. 2% coconut oil2% declared2.0% estimated
- 11. 1% nettle1% declared1.0% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Orygo
- Website
- https://sabrepetfood.co.uk/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- sabrepetfood.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 70 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.4 points. The processing format reduced the score by -6.7. The meat content contributed +4.1 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.42 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 42.4% | 0.096 | +4.07 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.7% | -0.115 | -1.24 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.8% | -0.092 | -0.44 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 42.1% | -0.005 | -0.22 |
| Undeclared quantities | 11.0% | -0.106 | -1.16 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.42 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 42.4% | 0.096 | +4.07 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.7% | -0.115 | -1.24 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.8% | -0.092 | -0.44 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 42.1% | -0.005 | -0.22 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 11.0% | -0.106 | -1.16 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 70.4
- Final score
- 70/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 23 | 24.5 (band 20.02978723404255 to 40%) | 83.3 |
| Fat | 12 | 12.8 (band 6.120212765957447 to 20%) | 98.7 |
| Fibre | 4 | 4.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.2 | 1.3 (band 0.5563829787234043 to 2.5%) | 92.2 |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 1.1 (band 0.4451063829787234 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 82 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 418.4 | 445.1 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 20 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A (3a672a): 15,000 I.U/kg
- Vitamin D3 (3a671): 1,500 I.U/kg
- Vitamin E (3a700): 250 mg/kg
- Vitamin K2: 1.37 mg/kg
- Vitamin B1 (3a821): 13.2 mg/kg
- Vitamin B2: 7.68 mg/kg
- Niacin (3a314): 30 mg/kg
- Vitamin B5 (3a841): 24.34 mg/kg
- Vitamin B6 (3a831): 7.20 mg/kg
- Vitamin B12: 72 mcg/kg
- Biotin (3a880): 312 mcg/kg
- Vitamin B9 (3a316): 1.20 mg/kg
- Vitamin C (3a300): 60 mg/kg
- Betaine (3a925): 300 mg/kg
- Iron Sulfate Monohydrate: 84 mg/kg
- Potassium Iodide (3b201)
- Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate: 4.80 mg/kg
- Manganese Oxide: 57.60 mg/kg
- Zinc Oxide (3b603): 90 mg/kg
- Selenium Organic CNCM l-3399 (3b812): 0.18 mg/kg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (89% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 17.8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Gluten-free" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cold-pressed (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Highly nutritious (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| makes a great alternative to a raw diet (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains 8.4kg of fresh, raw beef per kilogram (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains no less than 60% meat (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Gluten-free (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Complete Dry Dog Food - Beef
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.