Orygo Complete Cold Pressed Senior/Light Turkey & White Fish

Dry Cold Pressed · completeHigh meatClear label

Complete Cold Pressed Senior/Light Turkey & White Fish
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Orygo Complete Cold Pressed Senior/Light Turkey & White Fish a good dog food?

We score it 67/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete cold-pressed dry food for senior dogs, with turkey, white fish and partially hydrolysed starch as the main ingredients.

How we score

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 53% of the dry matter (76% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Prints a percentage for nearly every ingredient, so the recipe is fully auditable.

Why you might not

We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists white fish
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 26% · Fat 10%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein26%
Fat10%
Fibre2.50%
Ash7%
Moisture15%

Energy: 332 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Store in a cool, dry, place shaded from sunlight.

Feeding guide

Suitable for older or overweight dogs of all breeds — use the SENIOR ration for older dogs and the LIGHT ration for dogs needing to manage their weight. Make sure that fresh and clean water is always available for your dog.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A (3a672a): 22,726 I.U; Vitamin D3 (3a671): 1,450 I.U; Vitamin E (3a700): 454 I.U; Manganese (3b503): 36 mg; Iron (3b103): 72 mg; Copper (3b405): 7.2 mg; Zinc (3b603): 100 mg; Iodine (3b201): 1.27 mg

Ingredients (15)0% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 76.3%
  • carb 10.0%
  • veg 3.9%
  • additive 3.5%
  • fibre 3.3%
  • supplement 3.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
150% fresh turkeyTurkeymeat · medium5050.0
226% fresh white fishWhite Fishmeat · good2626.0
310% partially hydrolysed starchPartially Hydrolysed Starchcarb · poor1010.0
43.5% tocopherols and essential oilsTocopherolsadditive · good3.53.5
53.3% ground beet pulpBeet Pulpfibre · medium3.33.3
63% pumpkinPumpkinveg · good33.0
73% brewer's yeastBrewer's Yeastsupplement · good33.0
80.3% chicoryChicoryveg · good0.30.3
90.1% eggEggmeat · good0.10.1
100.1% blueberriesBlueberriesveg · good0.10.1
110.1% pearPearsveg · good0.10.1
120.1% appleApplesveg · good0.10.1
130.1% turmericTurmericveg · good0.10.1
140.1% rosemaryRosemaryveg · good0.10.1
150.1% thymeThymeveg · good0.10.1
  1. 1. 50% fresh turkey50% declared50.0% estimated
    Turkey · meat · medium
  2. 2. 26% fresh white fish26% declared26.0% estimated
    White Fish · meat · good
  3. 3. 10% partially hydrolysed starch10% declared10.0% estimated
  4. 4. 3.5% tocopherols and essential oils3.5% declared3.5% estimated
    Tocopherols · additive · good
  5. 5. 3.3% ground beet pulp3.3% declared3.3% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  6. 6. 3% pumpkin3% declared3.0% estimated
    Pumpkin · veg · good
  7. 7. 3% brewer's yeast3% declared3.0% estimated
    Brewer's Yeast · supplement · good
  8. 8. 0.3% chicory0.3% declared0.3% estimated
    Chicory · veg · good
  9. 9. 0.1% egg0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Egg · meat · good
  10. 10. 0.1% blueberries0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Blueberries · veg · good
  11. 11. 0.1% pear0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Pears · veg · good
  12. 12. 0.1% apple0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Apples · veg · good
  13. 13. 0.1% turmeric0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Turmeric · veg · good
  14. 14. 0.1% rosemary0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Rosemary · veg · good
  15. 15. 0.1% thyme0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Thyme · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13

Brand and contact: Orygo

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-13
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
sabrepetfood.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The product scored 67 out of 100. The meat content contributed +5.1 points, and the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2.8 points. On the other hand, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7 points, and the carbohydrate content reduced it by -2.6 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.39.191+2.83
Meat share of dry matter53.5%0.096+5.13
Carb share of dry matter22.6%-0.115-2.60
Vegetable share of dry matter1.7%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter7.9%0.163+1.29
Supplement share of dry matter6.9%-0.012-0.08
Recipe graded poor10.0%-0.065-0.65
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient10.0%0.060+0.60
Undeclared quantities0.2%-0.106-0.02
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Additive penalty-4.200.222-0.93
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.39.191+2.83
Meat share of dry matter53.5%0.096+5.13
Carb share of dry matter22.6%-0.115-2.60
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter1.7%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter7.9%0.163+1.29
Supplement share of dry matter6.9%-0.012-0.08
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor10.0%-0.065-0.65
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients1-0.876-0.88
Largest single poor ingredient10.0%0.060+0.60
Undeclared quantities0.2%-0.106-0.02
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-4.200.222-0.93
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
66.7
Final score
67/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v367/100current
v279/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2630.6 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat1011.8 (band 5.5 to 20%)95.9
Fibre2.52.9 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Energy (kcal/100g)332390.6100

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A (3a672a): 22,726 I.U
  • Vitamin D3 (3a671): 1,450 I.U
  • Vitamin E (3a700): 454 I.U
  • Manganese (3b503): 36 mg
  • Iron (3b103): 72 mg
  • Copper (3b405): 7.2 mg
  • Zinc (3b603): 100 mg
  • Iodine (3b201): 1.27 mg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (99.8% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)20/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Cold-pressed and slowly cooked at a low temperature (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Reduced fat formula suited to senior or overweight dogs (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Natural, local and sustainably-sourced ingredients, traceable to suppliers in the Iberian Peninsula (on page)provenancenot checkableManufacturer assertion
No meat meals or by-products (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Made with 76% fresh meat and fish (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Gluten-free (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No artificial colours or flavours (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Complete Cold Pressed Senior/Light Turkey & White Fish

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Orygo

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.