OMNI Irritated Skin Supplement
Supplement · complementaryClear label
Our verdict
Is OMNI Irritated Skin Supplement a good dog food?
This is a supplement, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a supplement should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.
Complementary supplement for dogs of all life stages, with brewer's yeast, gram flour and glycerine as the main ingredients.
93% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- You are limiting fat: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
- You need more protein than this: 12.1% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9.80% · Fat 16.20%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9.80% |
| Fat | 16.20% |
| Fibre | 2.90% |
| Ash | 3.50% |
| Moisture | 18.90% |
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin C; Vitamin E
Technological additives
Natural Preservatives; Flavourings
Ingredients (16)93% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 31.4%
- supplement 27.0%
- oil 17.2%
- veg 10.7%
- other 7.5%
- additive 6.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brewer's Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 8.6 |
| 2 | Garbanzo Flour | Gram flour | carb · good | - | 8.3 |
| 3 | Glycerine | Glycerine | other · medium | - | 8.0 |
| 4 | Flax Seed Oil | Linseed oil | oil · good | - | 7.7 |
| 5 | Tapioca Flour | Tapioca | carb · medium | - | 7.4 |
| 6 | Potato Starch | Potato starch | carb · poor | - | 7.1 |
| 7 | Dried Algae (5.3%) | Seaweed | veg · good | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| 8 | Methyl Sulphonyl Methane | MSM | supplement · good | - | 6.8 |
| 9 | Magnesium Stearate | Magnesium stearate | additive · poor | - | 6.5 |
| 10 | Yeast Hydrolysates (2%) | Yeast | supplement · good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 11 | Sunflower Seed Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 6.2 |
| 12 | Dried Blueberry | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 5.9 |
| 13 | Sweet Potato Powder | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 5.5 |
| 14 | Pea Protein | Pea protein | carb · medium | - | 5.2 |
| 15 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.9 |
| 16 | Coconut Oil | Coconut Oil | oil · medium | - | 4.6 |
- 1. Brewer's Yeast8.6% estimated
- 2. Garbanzo Flour8.3% estimated
- 3. Glycerine8.0% estimated
- 4. Flax Seed Oil7.7% estimated
- 5. Tapioca Flour7.4% estimated
- 6. Potato Starch7.1% estimated
- 7. Dried Algae (5.3%)5.3% declared5.3% estimated
- 8. Methyl Sulphonyl Methane6.8% estimated
- 9. Magnesium Stearate6.5% estimated
- 10. Yeast Hydrolysates (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
- 11. Sunflower Seed Oil6.2% estimated
- 12. Dried Blueberry5.9% estimated
- 13. Sweet Potato Powder5.5% estimated
- 14. Pea Protein5.2% estimated
- 15. Minerals4.9% estimated
- 16. Coconut Oil4.6% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: OMNI
- Website
- https://omni.pet/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- +44 204 538 4509
- Address
- 85 Great Portland Street, 1st Floor, London, W1W 7LT United Kingdom
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Product page
- omni.pet
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.02 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 28.2% | -0.115 | -3.24 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.1% | -0.092 | -1.85 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 11.4% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.6% | 0.163 | +1.07 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 29.3% | -0.012 | -0.36 |
| Other share of dry matter | 4.4% | -0.375 | -1.67 |
| Recipe graded poor | 12.9% | -0.065 | -0.84 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.7% | 0.060 | +0.40 |
| Undeclared quantities | 92.7% | -0.106 | -9.79 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -7.42 | 0.222 | -1.65 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.02 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 28.2% | -0.115 | -3.24 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.1% | -0.092 | -1.85 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 11.4% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.6% | 0.163 | +1.07 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 29.3% | -0.012 | -0.36 |
| Other share of dry matter | 4.4% | -0.375 | -1.67 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 12.9% | -0.065 | -0.84 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.7% | 0.060 | +0.40 |
| Undeclared quantities | 92.7% | -0.106 | -9.79 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -7.42 | 0.222 | -1.65 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 43.5
- Final score
- 43/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (7.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 1.5/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Allergy-friendly: no grain, soya, gluten or animal protein" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
14 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rich in Omega 3+6 (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NATURAL SUPPORT THAT TASTES LIKE A TREAT (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Tasty 1-a-day chews to support itchy skin and waxy ears. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vet formulated and approved (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 1-a-day soft chew your dog will love (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Cold-pressed to protect active compounds (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fast-acting and safe for daily use (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Allergy-friendly: no grain, soya, gluten or animal protein (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vet-approved and hypoallergenic (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Target Paw-Licking (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Support Normal Skin (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Support Ear Comfort (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Help Maintain Healthy Skin (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps Maintain Coat Condition (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 30 day taste-test guarantee (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.