Nutriwolds Yorkshire Rainbow Trout Pet Complete
Raw · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Nutriwolds Yorkshire Rainbow Trout Pet Complete a good dog food?
We score it 81/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete raw food for dogs of all life stages, with beef, trout and heart as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists trout
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 32.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 17% · Fat 8%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 17% |
| Fat | 8% |
| Fibre | 2% |
| Ash | 1% |
| Moisture | 75% |
Energy: 152 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Defrost within the container in the fridge and serve raw at room temperature. Once defrosted, portion and serve or refreeze once if desired. Any food not served may be stored in the container away from other food in the fridge for up to 3 days. Frozen orders dispatched Monday-Thursday only.
Feeding guide
Puppy up to 4 months: 8-10% body weight; up to 6 months: 6-8%; up to 8 months: 4-6%; up to 12 months: 3-4%; Adult: 2-3% body weight. Cats: Kitten 5-6%, Adult 2-3%. Fresh water available at all times.
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (21)21 of 21 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- meat 79.9%
- veg 15.1%
- mineral 3.8%
- oil 0.7%
- additive 0.3%
- carb 0.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lean Grass Fed Beef (33.45%) | Beef | meat · medium | 33.45 | 33.5 |
| 2 | Whole Wansford Rainbow Trout (18.36%) | Trout | meat · good | 18.36 | 18.4 |
| 3 | Grass Fed Ox Heart (8.70%) | Heart | meat · good | 8.7 | 8.7 |
| 4 | Grass Fed Ox Kidney (7.84%) | Beef Kidney | meat · good | 7.84 | 7.8 |
| 5 | Grass Fed Ox Liver (5.90%) | Beef Liver | meat · good | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| 6 | Organic Red Cabbage (5.4%) | Cabbage | veg · good | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| 7 | Organic Mooli (4.33%) | Organic Mooli | veg · good | 4.33 | 4.3 |
| 8 | Oyster (3.83%) | Oyster Shell | mineral · good | 3.83 | 3.8 |
| 9 | Grass Fed Ox Spleen (3.44%) | Beef Spleen | meat · good | 3.44 | 3.4 |
| 10 | Organic Courgette (2.58%) | Courgette | veg · good | 2.58 | 2.6 |
| 11 | Grass Fed Ox Rib (2.19%) | Grass-fed Ox Rib | meat · good | 2.19 | 2.2 |
| 12 | Organic Pumpkin Seeds (1.29%) | Pumpkin Seeds | veg · good | 1.29 | 1.3 |
| 13 | Organic Cold Pressed Hempseed Oil (0.69%) | Hemp Oil | oil · good | 0.69 | 0.7 |
| 14 | Organic Parsley (0.32%) | Parsley | veg · good | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| 15 | Organic Fresh Ginger (0.31%) | Ginger | veg · good | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| 16 | Himalayan Pink Rock Salt (0.26%) | Salt | additive · poor | 0.26 | 0.3 |
| 17 | Organic Turmeric (0.26%) | Turmeric | veg · good | 0.26 | 0.3 |
| 18 | Organic Sundried Tomato (0.25%) | Tomato | veg · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 19 | Organic Wheatgrass (0.25%) | Wheatgrass | carb · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 20 | Organic Sage (0.23%) | Sage | veg · good | 0.23 | 0.2 |
| 21 | Wild Grown Seaweed (0.15%) | Seaweed | veg · good | 0.15 | 0.1 |
- 1. Lean Grass Fed Beef (33.45%)33.45% declared33.5% estimated
- 2. Whole Wansford Rainbow Trout (18.36%)18.36% declared18.4% estimated
- 3. Grass Fed Ox Heart (8.70%)8.7% declared8.7% estimated
- 4. Grass Fed Ox Kidney (7.84%)7.84% declared7.8% estimated
- 5. Grass Fed Ox Liver (5.90%)5.9% declared5.9% estimated
- 6. Organic Red Cabbage (5.4%)5.4% declared5.4% estimated
- 7. Organic Mooli (4.33%)4.33% declared4.3% estimated
- 8. Oyster (3.83%)3.83% declared3.8% estimated
- 9. Grass Fed Ox Spleen (3.44%)3.44% declared3.4% estimated
- 10. Organic Courgette (2.58%)2.58% declared2.6% estimated
- 11. Grass Fed Ox Rib (2.19%)2.19% declared2.2% estimated
- 12. Organic Pumpkin Seeds (1.29%)1.29% declared1.3% estimated
- 13. Organic Cold Pressed Hempseed Oil (0.69%)0.69% declared0.7% estimated
- 14. Organic Parsley (0.32%)0.32% declared0.3% estimated
- 15. Organic Fresh Ginger (0.31%)0.31% declared0.3% estimated
- 16. Himalayan Pink Rock Salt (0.26%)0.26% declared0.3% estimated
- 17. Organic Turmeric (0.26%)0.26% declared0.3% estimated
- 18. Organic Sundried Tomato (0.25%)0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 19. Organic Wheatgrass (0.25%)0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 20. Organic Sage (0.23%)0.23% declared0.2% estimated
- 21. Wild Grown Seaweed (0.15%)0.15% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-26
Brand and contact: Nutriwolds
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 03300100223
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-26
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.nutriwolds.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product scored 81 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.6 points, and the meat content contributed +6.9 points. However, the oil and fat content reduced the total by -0.2 points, and the carbohydrate content also lowered the total by -0.1 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.56 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 71.9% | 0.096 | +6.90 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.7% | -0.115 | -0.08 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.092 | -0.20 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.7% | -0.005 | -0.07 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.8% | 0.163 | +0.12 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.3% | -0.065 | -0.02 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.3% | 0.060 | +0.02 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -0.32 | 0.222 | -0.07 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.56 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 71.9% | 0.096 | +6.90 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.7% | -0.115 | -0.08 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.092 | -0.20 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.7% | -0.005 | -0.07 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.8% | 0.163 | +0.12 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.3% | -0.065 | -0.02 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.3% | 0.060 | +0.02 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.32 | 0.222 | -0.07 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 80.9
- Final score
- 81/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 17 | 68 (band 27.36 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 8 | 32 (band 8.36 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2 | 8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 152 | 608 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Hand made by us in Yorkshire" — supported by the declared made in the UK data.
- "No grain, no tripe fillers" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hand made by us in Yorkshire (on page) | provenance | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| For all Life Stages (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No grain, no tripe fillers (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| No synthetic premixes, additives, or preservatives (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Promotes health and well being (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Yorkshire Rainbow Trout Pet Complete
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.