Our verdict
Is Nutriwolds Lamb Cool Pot a good dog food?
We score it 81/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete raw food for dogs of all life stages, with lamb, heart and beef liver as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef liver
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists cod liver oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 51.3% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 15.50% · Fat 19.10%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 15.50% |
| Fat | 19.10% |
| Fibre | 2.80% |
| Ash | 1.50% |
| Moisture | 62.80% |
| Calcium | 3.34% |
| Phosphorus | 3.22% |
Energy: 240 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Defrost within the container in the fridge and serve raw at room temperature. Once defrosted, portion and serve or refreeze once if desired. Any food not served may be stored in the container away from other food in the fridge for up to 3 days.
Feeding guide
Puppy up to 4 months: 8-10% body weight; Puppy up to 6 months: 6-8%; Puppy up to 8 months: 4-6%; Puppy up to 12 months: 3-4%; Adult 12 months+: 2-3%. Cats: Kitten 5-6%, Adult 2-3%. Fresh water available 24/7.
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (20)20 of 20 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- meat 91.0%
- veg 7.9%
- oil 0.6%
- additive 0.2%
- carb 0.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grass Fed Lamb (61.97%) | Lamb | meat · medium | 61.97 | 62.0 |
| 2 | Grass Fed Ox Heart (16.47%) | Heart | meat · good | 16.47 | 16.5 |
| 3 | Grass Fed Ox Liver (7.88%) | Beef Liver | meat · good | 7.88 | 7.9 |
| 4 | Free Range Egg Yolk (2.78%) | Egg | meat · good | 2.78 | 2.8 |
| 5 | Organic Courgettes (2.38%) | Courgette | veg · good | 2.38 | 2.4 |
| 6 | Organic Red Cabbage (2.38%) | Cabbage | veg · good | 2.38 | 2.4 |
| 7 | Grass Fed Ox Rib (1.92%) | Grass-fed Ox Rib | meat · good | 1.92 | 1.9 |
| 8 | Organic Pumpkin Seeds (1.18%) | Pumpkin Seeds | veg · good | 1.18 | 1.2 |
| 9 | Organic Mooli (0.47%) | Organic Mooli | veg · good | 0.47 | 0.5 |
| 10 | Organic Cold Pressed Flaxseed Oil (0.35%) | Linseed oil | oil · good | 0.35 | 0.3 |
| 11 | Organic Ginger (0.35%) | Ginger | veg · good | 0.35 | 0.3 |
| 12 | Organic Turmeric (0.35%) | Turmeric | veg · good | 0.35 | 0.3 |
| 13 | Cod Liver Oil (0.27%) | Cod Liver Oil | oil · good | 0.27 | 0.3 |
| 14 | Himalayan Pink Rock Salt (0.24%) | Salt | additive · poor | 0.24 | 0.2 |
| 15 | Organic Spinach (0.24%) | Spinach | veg · good | 0.24 | 0.2 |
| 16 | Sun-Dried Tomatoes (0.24%) | Tomato | veg · good | 0.24 | 0.2 |
| 17 | Organic Wheatgrass (0.18%) | Wheatgrass | carb · good | 0.18 | 0.2 |
| 18 | Organic Thyme (0.12%) | Thyme | veg · good | 0.12 | 0.1 |
| 19 | Organic Parsley (0.12%) | Parsley | veg · good | 0.12 | 0.1 |
| 20 | Wild Grown Seaweed (0.12%) | Seaweed | veg · good | 0.12 | 0.1 |
- 1. Grass Fed Lamb (61.97%)61.97% declared62.0% estimated
- 2. Grass Fed Ox Heart (16.47%)16.47% declared16.5% estimated
- 3. Grass Fed Ox Liver (7.88%)7.88% declared7.9% estimated
- 4. Free Range Egg Yolk (2.78%)2.78% declared2.8% estimated
- 5. Organic Courgettes (2.38%)2.38% declared2.4% estimated
- 6. Organic Red Cabbage (2.38%)2.38% declared2.4% estimated
- 7. Grass Fed Ox Rib (1.92%)1.92% declared1.9% estimated
- 8. Organic Pumpkin Seeds (1.18%)1.18% declared1.2% estimated
- 9. Organic Mooli (0.47%)0.47% declared0.5% estimated
- 10. Organic Cold Pressed Flaxseed Oil (0.35%)0.35% declared0.3% estimated
- 11. Organic Ginger (0.35%)0.35% declared0.3% estimated
- 12. Organic Turmeric (0.35%)0.35% declared0.3% estimated
- 13. Cod Liver Oil (0.27%)0.27% declared0.3% estimated
- 14. Himalayan Pink Rock Salt (0.24%)0.24% declared0.2% estimated
- 15. Organic Spinach (0.24%)0.24% declared0.2% estimated
- 16. Sun-Dried Tomatoes (0.24%)0.24% declared0.2% estimated
- 17. Organic Wheatgrass (0.18%)0.18% declared0.2% estimated
- 18. Organic Thyme (0.12%)0.12% declared0.1% estimated
- 19. Organic Parsley (0.12%)0.12% declared0.1% estimated
- 20. Wild Grown Seaweed (0.12%)0.12% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-26
Brand and contact: Nutriwolds
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 03300100223
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-26
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.nutriwolds.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The score comes in at 81 out of 100. The meat content contributed +8.3 points and the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +6.3. On the other side, the oil and fat content took off -0.2 points and the carbohydrate content took off -0.1.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.32 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 86.8% | 0.096 | +8.34 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.5% | -0.115 | -0.06 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.1% | -0.092 | -0.19 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.8% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.7% | 0.163 | +0.12 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.2% | -0.065 | -0.02 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.2% | 0.060 | +0.01 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -0.29 | 0.222 | -0.07 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.32 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 86.8% | 0.096 | +8.34 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.5% | -0.115 | -0.06 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.1% | -0.092 | -0.19 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.8% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.7% | 0.163 | +0.12 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.2% | -0.065 | -0.02 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.2% | 0.060 | +0.01 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.29 | 0.222 | -0.07 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 81.2
- Final score
- 81/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 15.5 | 41.7 (band 29.032258064516128 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 19.1 | 51.3 (band 8.870967741935484 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.8 | 7.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 3.34 | 9 (band 0.8064516129032258 to 2.5%) | 0 |
| Phosphorus | 3.22 | 8.7 (band 0.6451612903225806 to 1.6%) | 0 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1 | 1 (band 1 to 2%) | 72.2 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 240 | 645.2 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "No grain, no tripe fillers" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Locally sourced from the rolling hills of Yorkshire (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hand made by us (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fully recyclable packaging (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Our food is Balanced and Complete to all requirements according to FEDIAF (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| All ingredients are Human Grade, certified Farmer Assured meat and organic vegetables and herbs (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No grain, no tripe fillers (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| No synthetic premixes, additives, or preservatives (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Promotes health and well being (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Lamb Cool Pot
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.