Nutrivet Sticks dentaires pour chiens Inne

Treat · complementaryClear label

Sticks dentaires pour chiens Inne
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is Nutrivet Sticks dentaires pour chiens Inne a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

Complementary extruded dry treats for adult dogs, with vegetables, peas and meat and animal derivatives as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

57% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.
  • Low in fat for its format: 3% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
  • 3 poor-graded ingredients make up about 34% of the recipe.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 7 ingredients.
  • Uses generic terms (Chicken): the specific animal source is not stated.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints quantities for 2 ingredients.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 21% · Fat 3.20%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein21%
Fat3.20%
Fibre2.40%
Ash8%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Une fois ouvert, refermer correctement et conserver dans un endroit frais et sec.

Feeding guide

Ces friandises peuvent être données à tout moment de la journée. Adaptez les quantités selon l’activité et les conditions environnementales de votre animal. Veillez à ne pas dépasser les quantités maximales par jour.

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (7)57% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • unknown 40.0%
  • meat 15.8%
  • veg 14.2%
  • other 11.4%
  • oil 10.0%
  • supplement 8.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1VegetablesVegetablesveg · medium-14.3
2peas 40%Peasveg · good4040.0
3meat and animal derivativesMeat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor-12.8
4chicken 3%Chickenmeat · medium33.0
5derivatives of vegetable originVegetable By-Productsother · poor-11.4
6oils and fatsOils and Fatsoil · poor-10.0
7mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-8.5
  1. 1. Vegetables14.3% estimated
    Vegetables · veg · medium
  2. 2. peas 40%40% declared40.0% estimated
    Peas · veg · good
  3. 3. meat and animal derivatives12.8% estimated
  4. 4. chicken 3%3% declared3.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  5. 5. derivatives of vegetable origin11.4% estimated
    Vegetable By-Products · other · poor
  6. 6. oils and fats10.0% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor
  7. 7. minerals8.5% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Nutrivet

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Product page
www.nutrivet.fr

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.39.191-2.53
Meat share of dry matter1.7%0.096+0.16
Oil share of dry matter19.7%-0.092-1.82
Vegetable share of dry matter4.3%-0.005-0.02
Supplement share of dry matter15.7%-0.012-0.19
Other share of dry matter11.4%-0.375-4.27
Unrecognised share of dry matter40.0%-0.027-1.06
Recipe graded poor34.2%-0.065-2.22
Poor-quality meat in recipe12.8%-0.179-2.29
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient12.8%0.060+0.77
Undeclared quantities57.0%-0.106-6.02
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-1.030.222-0.23
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.39.191-2.53
Meat share of dry matter1.7%0.096+0.16
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.115+0.00
Oil share of dry matter19.7%-0.092-1.82
Vegetable share of dry matter4.3%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter15.7%-0.012-0.19
Other share of dry matter11.4%-0.375-4.27
Unrecognised share of dry matter40.0%-0.027-1.06
Recipe graded poor34.2%-0.065-2.22
Poor-quality meat in recipe12.8%-0.179-2.29
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient12.8%0.060+0.77
Undeclared quantities57.0%-0.106-6.02
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-1.030.222-0.23
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Subtotal
31.8
Final score
32/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v332/100current
v236/100
v141/100
v1.944/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (43% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)8.6/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "fabriqués sans céréales" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

3 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Contribue à l’hygiène dentaire des chiens (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Aide au nettoyage des dents (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
fabriqués sans céréales (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
seulement 74 kcal par stick (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from Nutrivet

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.