ASA ruling upheldNutripaw: A paid-for Facebook ad for a dog dental care product misleadingly and irresponsibly implied that dogs undergoing veterinary treatment had a high chance of dying, made medicinal claims for an unauthorised product, and made misleading efficacy claims. ASA ruling, August 2026
Nutripaw Flea & Tick Treats
Treat complementary
Is Nutripaw Flea & Tick Treats a good dog food?
This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- RecipeNot applicable
- NutritionalNot applicable
- Transparency30
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
Complementary semi-moist dry treats for dogs of all life stages, with potato starch, gram flour and glycerine as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Single named animal protein: pork.
- Doesn't list grain ingredients.
Why you might not
- A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
- 4 poor-graded ingredients make up about 20% of the recipe.
- Meat makes up an estimated 0% of the dry matter; carbohydrates dominate.
What the label tells us
- The label lists 20 ingredients.
- Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
- Prints no ingredient quantities.
Why is this treat not scored?
Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.
What should I look for on a treat label?
A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.
These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: pork
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (21)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Potato Starch | Potato starch | carb | poor | - | 6.3 |
| 2 | Garbanzo Bean Flour | Gram flour | carb | good | - | 6.1 |
| 3 | Glycerin | Glycerine | other | medium | - | 6.0 |
| 4 | Brewer’s Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement | good | - | 5.8 |
| 5 | Pea flour | Pea flour | carb | medium | - | 5.7 |
| 6 | Flaxseed Powder | Linseed | veg | good | - | 5.5 |
| 7 | Coconut Oil | Coconut Oil | oil | medium | - | 5.4 |
| 8 | Flaxseed Oil | Linseed oil | oil | good | - | 5.2 |
| 9 | Garlic Powder | Garlic | veg | medium | - | 5.1 |
| 10 | Sunflower Lecithin | Lecithin | supplement | good | - | 4.9 |
| 11 | Tapioca Starch | Tapioca | carb | medium | - | 4.8 |
| 12 | Apple Cider Vinegar | Vinegar | additive | poor | - | 4.6 |
| 13 | Bacon Flavor | Flavor | additive | poor | - | 4.5 |
| 14 | Citric Acid | Citric Acid | additive | poor | - | 4.3 |
| 15 | Ascorbic Acid | Vitamin C | supplement | good | - | 4.2 |
| 16 | Niacinamide | Niacinamide | supplement | medium | - | 4.0 |
| 17 | Tocopheryl Acetate | Vitamin E | supplement | good | - | 3.9 |
| 18 | Thiamine HCL | unmatched | - | - | - | 3.7 |
| 19 | Pyridoxine HCL | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | supplement | good | - | 3.6 |
| 20 | Riboflavin | Riboflavin | supplement | good | - | 3.4 |
| 21 | Vitamin B12 | Vitamin B12 | supplement | good | - | 3.3 |
Brand
- Website
- https://nutri-paw.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Product page
- nutri-paw.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.915 | +5.77 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 17.4% | -0.113 | -1.96 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 13.6% | -0.088 | -1.20 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.3% | -0.002 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 15.5% | 0.177 | +2.74 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 35.0% | -0.009 | -0.31 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.9% | -0.371 | -1.44 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.022 | -0.05 |
| Recipe graded poor | 20.3% | -0.045 | -0.91 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.868 | -3.47 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.6% | 0.056 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.131 | -13.09 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -1.988 | -1.99 |
| Additive penalty | -16.52 | 0.236 | -3.89 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | yes | -6.833 | -6.83 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.915 | +5.77 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.116 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 17.4% | -0.113 | -1.96 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 13.6% | -0.088 | -1.20 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.3% | -0.002 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 15.5% | 0.177 | +2.74 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 35.0% | -0.009 | -0.31 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.9% | -0.371 | -1.44 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.022 | -0.05 |
| Recipe graded poor | 20.3% | -0.045 | -0.91 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.868 | -3.47 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.6% | 0.056 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.131 | -13.09 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 3.194 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 1.703 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -1.988 | -1.99 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | -0.073 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -16.52 | 0.236 | -3.89 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.996 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | yes | -6.833 | -6.83 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.22
- Subtotal
- 38.2
- Final score
- 38/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 38/100 | current |
| v1 | 44/100 | |
| v1.9 | 46/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| GMO & Grain-Free (on page) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
| Our vet-approved formula combines ingredients like brewer's yeast, coconut oil, and flaxseed to naturally control fleas and ticks, while supporting your pet's skin and coat health. (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| These scientifically formulated chews not only help in managing pests but also promote environmental well-being by reducing dependency on synthetic chemicals. (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Shiny, Soft & Healthy Coat (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Soothes Scratching & Itching (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally Controls Fleas & Ticks (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Eco-friendly Pest Support (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nourishes & Protects the Skin (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Brewer's yeast and garlic powder act as natural support against pests. (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Coconut oil and apple cider vinegar soothe and calm itchy skin. (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Flaxseed oil and coconut oil nourish the coat, making it shiny, soft & healthy. (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Flaxseed helps strengthen the skin and apple cider vinegar support skin health and a vibrant coat. (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally control Fleas & Ticks within 30 days (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| FREE of Wheat, Corn, Sugar, Grains & Preservatives (on page) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
| 120 Natural Bacon Flavour Chews For Flea & Tick Support (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% All Natural Ingredients (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Nutripaw
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.