Nood Recette pour Petite et Moyenne Race au Poulet avec Superaliments
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Nood Recette pour Petite et Moyenne Race au Poulet avec Superaliments a good dog food?
We score it 53/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for dogs of all life stages, with chicken, dehydrated pork protein and maize as the main ingredients.
75% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists hydrolysed poultry protein
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists dehydrated pork protein
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists maize / corn
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 26.50% · Fat 15%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 26.50% |
| Fat | 15% |
| Fibre | 3.90% |
| Ash | 8.40% |
| Moisture | 9% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.40% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2% |
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 15000 UI; Vitamin D3 1500 UI; Vitamin E 101 mg; Fer (Sulfate de fer monohydraté) 50 mg; Iode (Iodate de calcium anhydre) 1.5 mg; Cuivre (Sulfate de cuivre pentahydraté) 10.0 mg; Manganèse (sulfate de manganèse monohydraté) 10.0 mg; zinc (sulfate de zinc monohydraté) 62.5 mg; sélénium (sulfate de sodium sélénite) 0.20 mg
Technological additives
Sépiolite 350 mg; Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 109 ufc; extraits de tocophérols (naturels) d'huile végétale
Ingredients (24)75% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 36.0%
- veg 28.3%
- carb 16.4%
- oil 7.3%
- fibre 6.4%
- supplement 5.2%
- unknown 0.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fresh chicken (14%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 14 | 14.0 |
| 2 | dehydrated pork protein | Dehydrated Pork Protein | meat · good | - | 8.8 |
| 3 | maize | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 8.4 |
| 4 | barley | Barley | carb · medium | - | 8.0 |
| 5 | whole peas (10%) | Peas | veg · good | 10 | 10.0 |
| 6 | split peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 7.6 |
| 7 | hydrolysed poultry protein | Hydrolysed Poultry Protein | meat · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 8 | pork fat (preserved with a mix of tocopherols) | Pork Fat | oil · medium | - | 6.8 |
| 9 | dried beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 6.4 |
| 10 | dehydrated chicken protein | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 6.0 |
| 11 | salmon oil (0.5%) | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 12 | dried chicory root (a natural source of FOS and inulin) | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 5.6 |
| 13 | sodium hexametaphosphate (0.35%) | Sodium hexametaphosphate | additive · medium | 0.35 | 0.3 |
| 14 | linseed (0.25%) | Linseed | veg · good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 15 | dried brewer's yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 5.2 |
| 16 | blueberry (0.01%) | Blueberries | veg · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 17 | sweet potato (0.01%) | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 18 | carrot (0.01%) | Carrots | veg · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 19 | spinach (0.01%) | Spinach | veg · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 20 | green peas (0.01%) | Peas | veg · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 21 | apple (0.01%) | Apples | veg · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 22 | turmeric (0.01%) | Turmeric | veg · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 23 | marshmallow | Marshmallow Root | veg · good | - | 4.8 |
| 24 | peppermint (0.01%) | Peppermint | veg · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
- 1. Fresh chicken (14%)14% declared14.0% estimated
- 2. dehydrated pork protein8.8% estimated
- 3. maize8.4% estimated
- 4. barley8.0% estimated
- 5. whole peas (10%)10% declared10.0% estimated
- 6. split peas7.6% estimated
- 7. hydrolysed poultry protein7.2% estimated
- 8. pork fat (preserved with a mix of tocopherols)6.8% estimated
- 9. dried beet pulp6.4% estimated
- 10. dehydrated chicken protein6.0% estimated
- 11. salmon oil (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 12. dried chicory root (a natural source of FOS and inulin)5.6% estimated
- 13. sodium hexametaphosphate (0.35%)0.35% declared0.3% estimated
- 14. linseed (0.25%)0.25% declared0.3% estimated
- 15. dried brewer's yeast5.2% estimated
- 16. blueberry (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
- 17. sweet potato (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
- 18. carrot (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
- 19. spinach (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
- 20. green peas (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
- 21. apple (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
- 22. turmeric (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
- 23. marshmallow4.8% estimated
- 24. peppermint (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22
Brand and contact: Nood
- Website
- https://noodpetfood.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- noodpetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a final score of 53 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.7 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -7.9. Additionally, the processing format deducted -6.7 and the carbohydrate content contributed -2.9.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.71 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 6.9% | 0.096 | +0.66 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 25.3% | -0.115 | -2.91 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.6% | -0.092 | -1.16 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.8% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 8.4% | -0.012 | -0.10 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.027 | -0.01 |
| Undeclared quantities | 74.8% | -0.106 | -7.90 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.71 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 6.9% | 0.096 | +0.66 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 25.3% | -0.115 | -2.91 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.6% | -0.092 | -1.16 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.8% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 8.4% | -0.012 | -0.10 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.027 | -0.01 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 74.8% | -0.106 | -7.90 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 52.7
- Final score
- 53/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26.5 | 29.1 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 15 | 16.5 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3.9 | 4.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 15000 UI
- Vitamin D3 1500 UI
- Vitamin E 101 mg
- Fer (Sulfate de fer monohydraté) 50 mg
- Iode (Iodate de calcium anhydre) 1.5 mg
- Cuivre (Sulfate de cuivre pentahydraté) 10.0 mg
- Manganèse (sulfate de manganèse monohydraté) 10.0 mg
- zinc (sulfate de zinc monohydraté) 62.5 mg
- sélénium (sulfate de sodium sélénite) 0.20 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (25.2% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 5/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poils brillants (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ventres heureux (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vitalité accrue (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| notre formule pour petites et moyennes races utilise des protéines de haute qualité comme premier ingrédient pour favoriser le développement de la masse musculaire maigre (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Enrichi d'oméga-6, de superaliments, de probiotiques, de vitamines et de minéraux (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulé par des nutritionnistes pour animaux de compagnie (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Poulet élevé au sol comme ingrédient principal (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rempli de superaliments et de probiotiques (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ingrédients 100% traçables (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| faible en calories (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| riche en goût (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Recette pour Petite et Moyenne Race au Poulet avec Superaliments
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.