Naturediet Feel Good Puppy with Chicken
Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Naturediet Feel Good Puppy with Chicken a good dog food?
We score it 76/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet paté food for puppies, with chicken, rice and carrots as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You are limiting fat: 31.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 11% · Fat 9%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 11% |
| Fat | 9% |
| Fibre | 1.50% |
| Ash | 3% |
| Moisture | 71% |
Energy: 134 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool, dry place. Once opened please refrigerate and use within 48 hours. Do not microwave in container. Suitable for freezing.
Feeding guide
Recommended for puppies from weaning onwards (around 3-5 weeks) until around 12 months of age; gradual transition over 7-10 days onto adult food. Also suitable for pregnant bitches from around 5 weeks into pregnancy and during lactation. Contact nutrition team for specific feeding amounts.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A - 3,600 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 - 300 IU/kg; Iron (as Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) - 14.4 mg/kg; Copper (as Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) - 2 mg/kg; Manganese (as Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate) - 2.4 mg/kg; Zinc (as Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) - 30 mg/kg
Ingredients (6)6 of 6 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- meat 63.2%
- other 30.3%
- veg 3.2%
- carb 3.2%
- supplement 0.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken (60%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 60 | 60.0 |
| 2 | Rice (3.2%) | Rice - white | carb · medium | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| 3 | Carrot (3.2%) | Carrots | veg · good | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| 4 | Dried Egg (3.2%) | Dried Egg | meat · medium | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| 5 | Dried Seaweed (0.1%) | Dried Sea Algae | supplement · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 6 | Nutrient blend and water (30.3%) | Water | other | 30.3 | 30.3 |
- 1. Chicken (60%)60% declared60.0% estimated
- 2. Rice (3.2%)3.2% declared3.2% estimated
- 3. Carrot (3.2%)3.2% declared3.2% estimated
- 4. Dried Egg (3.2%)3.2% declared3.2% estimated
- 5. Dried Seaweed (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 6. Nutrient blend and water (30.3%)30.3% declared30.3% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: Naturediet
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01362 822 320
- Contact page
- www.naturediet.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.naturediet.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product scored 76 out of 100. The meat content contributed +7.7 points and the overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.4 points. The remaining ingredients dragged the score down by -2.3 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete gave a boost of +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.42 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 80.1% | 0.096 | +7.69 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 11.4% | -0.115 | -1.31 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Other share of dry matter | 6.1% | -0.375 | -2.30 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.42 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 80.1% | 0.096 | +7.69 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 11.4% | -0.115 | -1.31 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.4% | -0.012 | -0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 6.1% | -0.375 | -2.30 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 76.4
- Final score
- 76/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11 | 37.9 | 100 |
| Fat | 9 | 31 | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 134 | 462.1 | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A - 3,600 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 - 300 IU/kg
- Iron (as Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) - 14.4 mg/kg
- Copper (as Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) - 2 mg/kg
- Manganese (as Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate) - 2.4 mg/kg
- Zinc (as Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) - 30 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced and complete (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports healthy growth (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ideal for puppies with sensitivities (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Suitable for pregnant and lactating bitches (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Gently steam cooked to lock in nutrients (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete & balanced (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Kind on sensitive stomachs (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Superior freshness & taste (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Wheat-free recipe (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with high-quality natural ingredients (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Recyclable packaging (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made from natural ingredients (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Feel Good Puppy with Chicken
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.