Naturediet Feel Good Grain Free

Treat · complementaryHigh meatClear label

Feel Good Grain Free
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is Naturediet Feel Good Grain Free a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

Complementary wet paté treats for dogs of all life stages, with chicken, carrots and potatoes as the main ingredients.

How we score

30% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 70% of the dry matter (77% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Single named animal protein: chicken.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
  • High in fat: 29% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: chicken
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • You are limiting fat: 28.6% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 6 ingredients.
  • Uses generic terms (Chicken, Dried Egg): the specific animal source is not stated.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints quantities for 4 ingredients.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 10% · Fat 8%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein10%
Fat8%
Fibre2%
Ash3%
Moisture72%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Keep fresh by sealing bag and storing in a cool, dry place.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin a 3, 300iu, Vitamin D3 275iu, Iron (Iron II Sulphate Monohydrate) 13.2mg, Copper (Copper II Sulphate Pentahydrate) 1.32mg, Manganese (Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate) 2.2mg, Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 27.5mg.

Ingredients (6)30% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 77.1%
  • supplement 12.9%
  • veg 6.5%
  • carb 3.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Chicken 60%Chickenmeat · medium6060.0
2Carrot 3.5%Carrotsveg · good3.53.5
3Potato 3.5%Potatoescarb · medium3.53.5
4Parsnip 3%Parsnipsveg · good33.0
5Dried EggDried Eggmeat · medium-17.1
6Dried SeaweedDried Sea Algaesupplement · good-12.9
  1. 1. Chicken 60%60% declared60.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  2. 2. Carrot 3.5%3.5% declared3.5% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  3. 3. Potato 3.5%3.5% declared3.5% estimated
    Potatoes · carb · medium
  4. 4. Parsnip 3%3% declared3.0% estimated
    Parsnips · veg · good
  5. 5. Dried Egg17.1% estimated
    Dried Egg · meat · medium
  6. 6. Dried Seaweed12.9% estimated
    Dried Sea Algae · supplement · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22

Brand and contact: Naturediet

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-08-22

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.63
Meat share of dry matter36.3%0.096+3.49
Carb share of dry matter1.9%-0.115-0.22
Vegetable share of dry matter2.1%-0.005-0.01
Supplement share of dry matter25.6%-0.012-0.31
Undeclared quantities30.0%-0.106-3.17
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.63
Meat share of dry matter36.3%0.096+3.49
Carb share of dry matter1.9%-0.115-0.22
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter2.1%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter25.6%-0.012-0.31
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities30.0%-0.106-3.17
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
71.1
Final score
71/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v371/100current
v277/100
v176/100
v1.976/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (70% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)14/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Grain-free and wheat-free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "Grain Free Recipe" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

3 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
combined with natural ingredients like carrot, honey, linseed and herbs to support overall wellbeing (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Made with 24% lamb meal (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Grain-free and wheat-free (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Only Natural Ingredients (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Grain Free Recipe (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from Naturediet

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.