Natural Woodland Country Diet

Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label

Country Diet
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Natural Woodland Country Diet a good dog food?

We score it 62/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete extruded dry food for dogs of all life stages, with chicken, rice and peas as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

48% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 36% of the dry matter (37% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
  • Your dog avoids turkey: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 28% · Fat 16%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein28%
Fat16%
Fibre3.50%
Ash8%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.30%
Omega-6 fatty acids3%
Calcium1.60%
Phosphorus1.25%

Additives & feeding info

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 18000 UI/kg; Vitamin D3 1400 UI/kg; Vitamin E 150 mg/kg; Iron 75 mg/kg; Iodine 3.5 mg/kg; Cooper 10 mg/kg; Manganese 7.5 mg/kg; Zinc 120 mg/kg; Selenium 0.12 mg/kg

Technological additives

Natural antioxidants (tocopherols)

Ingredients (15)48% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 37.3%
  • carb 20.9%
  • supplement 11.5%
  • veg 11.2%
  • oil 9.6%
  • fibre 9.6%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Dehydrated Turkey and Dehydrated chicken meat (20%)Chickenmeat · medium2020.0
2Wholegrain rice (15%)Rice - brown / whole graincarb · medium1515.0
3PeasPeasveg · good-6.2
4Ground riceRice flourcarb · medium-5.9
5Fresh chicken meat (10%)Chickenmeat · medium1010.0
6Chicken oilChicken Oil and Fatoil · good-5.6
7lentils (5%)Lentilsveg · medium55.0
8Dehydrated salmon (2%)Salmonmeat · good22.0
9Hydrolysed chicken liverHydrolysed Chicken Livermeat · medium-5.3
10CarobCarobfibre · medium-5.0
11Apple pulpApple Fibrefibre · medium-4.6
12MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-4.3
13Salmon oilSalmon Oiloil · good-4.0
14Brewers’ yeast (MOS)Yeastsupplement · good-3.7
15Glucosamine and ChondroitinChondroitinsupplement · good-3.4
  1. 1. Dehydrated Turkey and Dehydrated chicken meat (20%)20% declared20.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  2. 2. Wholegrain rice (15%)15% declared15.0% estimated
    Rice - brown / whole grain · carb · medium
  3. 3. Peas6.2% estimated
    Peas · veg · good
  4. 4. Ground rice5.9% estimated
    Rice flour · carb · medium
  5. 5. Fresh chicken meat (10%)10% declared10.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  6. 6. Chicken oil5.6% estimated
    Chicken Oil and Fat · oil · good
  7. 7. lentils (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
    Lentils · veg · medium
  8. 8. Dehydrated salmon (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
    Salmon · meat · good
  9. 9. Hydrolysed chicken liver5.3% estimated
    Hydrolysed Chicken Liver · meat · medium
  10. 10. Carob5.0% estimated
    Carob · fibre · medium
  11. 11. Apple pulp4.6% estimated
    Apple Fibre · fibre · medium
  12. 12. Minerals4.3% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  13. 13. Salmon oil4.0% estimated
    Salmon Oil · oil · good
  14. 14. Brewers’ yeast (MOS)3.7% estimated
    Yeast · supplement · good
  15. 15. Glucosamine and Chondroitin3.4% estimated
    Chondroitin · supplement · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Natural Woodland
Natural Woodland logo
Phone
+34 962 369 109
Address
Pol. Serrans V – 46812 Aielo de Malferit, Valencia (Spain)

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall score of 62 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +2.9 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.6 points. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages resulted in a deduction of -5.1 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.59
Meat share of dry matter30.0%0.096+2.88
Carb share of dry matter24.1%-0.115-2.77
Oil share of dry matter12.4%-0.092-1.14
Vegetable share of dry matter2.2%-0.005-0.01
Supplement share of dry matter13.7%-0.012-0.17
Undeclared quantities48.0%-0.106-5.07
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.59
Meat share of dry matter30.0%0.096+2.88
Carb share of dry matter24.1%-0.115-2.77
Oil share of dry matter12.4%-0.092-1.14
Vegetable share of dry matter2.2%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter13.7%-0.012-0.17
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities48.0%-0.106-5.07
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
61.6
Final score
62/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v362/100current
v261/100
v161/100
v1.962/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2830.9 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat1617.7 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre3.53.9 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium1.61.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus1.251.4 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.31.3 (band 1 to 2%)86.8
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 18000 UI/kg
  • Vitamin D3 1400 UI/kg
  • Vitamin E 150 mg/kg
  • Iron 75 mg/kg
  • Iodine 3.5 mg/kg
  • Cooper 10 mg/kg
  • Manganese 7.5 mg/kg
  • Zinc 120 mg/kg
  • Selenium 0.12 mg/kg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (52% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)10.4/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
HIGH DIGESTIBILITY (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Diet formulated with NO ARTIFICAL PRESERVATIVES (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Diet formulated with NO LACTOSE (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Diet formulated with NO ARTIFICIAL FLAVOURS (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
HIGH PALATABILITY (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Diet formulated with NO GLUTEN (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Diet formulated with NO COLOURS (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Diet formulated with NO POTATOES (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
made with fresh human-grade chicken meat that provides high palatability, in addition to great digestibility for dogs with sensitive stomach (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Country Diet

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Natural Woodland

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.