Natural Greatness Duck and Rabbit with Tomato, Apple and Fennel seed

Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label

Duck and Rabbit with Tomato, Apple and Fennel seed
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Natural Greatness Duck and Rabbit with Tomato, Apple and Fennel seed a good dog food?

We score it 76/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete wet food in chunks for adult dogs, with duck, rabbit and tomato as the main ingredients.

How we score

40% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
  • You are limiting fat: 28.8% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 8.10% · Fat 4.70%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein8.10%
Fat4.70%
Fibre1%
Ash2.30%
Moisture83.70%

Energy: 70.3 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Once opened, refrigerate the can and consume within 48 hours.

Feeding guide

Dosage table indicative; amount may vary depending on activity, breed and environmental conditions. Always provide fresh water.

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (5)40% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 93.2%
  • veg 6.7%
  • supplement 0.2%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Duck meat (30%)Duckmeat · medium3030.0
2Rabbit meat (26%)Rabbitmeat · good2626.0
3Tomato (2%)Tomatoveg · good22.0
4Apple (2%)Applesveg · good22.0
5Fennel Seeds (0.1%)Fennel Seedsupplement · good0.10.1
  1. 1. Duck meat (30%)30% declared30.0% estimated
    Duck · meat · medium
  2. 2. Rabbit meat (26%)26% declared26.0% estimated
    Rabbit · meat · good
  3. 3. Tomato (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
    Tomato · veg · good
  4. 4. Apple (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
    Apples · veg · good
  5. 5. Fennel Seeds (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Fennel Seed · supplement · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15

Brand and contact: Natural Greatness

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-15
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score for this food is 76 out of 100. The meat content contributed +9.2 points, and the overall quality of the ingredient list added a further +6.8 points. On the downside, ingredients without printed percentages cost -4.2 points, while the processing format deducted -0.7 points from the final result.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.82
Meat share of dry matter95.8%0.096+9.19
Vegetable share of dry matter3.7%-0.005-0.02
Supplement share of dry matter0.6%-0.012-0.01
Undeclared quantities39.9%-0.106-4.21
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Chunksyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.82
Meat share of dry matter95.8%0.096+9.19
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.115+0.00
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter3.7%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter0.6%-0.012-0.01
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities39.9%-0.106-4.21
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksyes-0.672-0.67
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Subtotal
76.4
Final score
76/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v376/100current
v278/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein8.149.7 (band 19.4079754601227 to 40%)100
Fat4.728.8 (band 5.930214723926381 to 20%)100
Fibre16.1 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Energy (kcal/100g)70.3431.3100

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (60.1% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)12/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
includes superfoods in its composition, such as apple, tomato, and fennel seeds (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
formulated without cereals (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
complete wet recipe, ultra-premium and hypoallergenic (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
LIGHT recipe recommended for dogs that need a lower carbohydrate intake (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
high palatability (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
ideally developed for adult dogs (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Apples contain vitamin C and vitamin A in the form of beta-carotene, an antioxidant essential for eye health and immune function in dogs (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Tomatoes are a natural source of fibre and vitamin C, with natural antioxidants that help fight premature ageing in adult dogs (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Fennel seeds help regulate the dog's digestive system and provide nutrients such as magnesium, vitamin C, B3, fibre, potassium and manganese (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Duck and Rabbit with Tomato, Apple and Fennel seed

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Natural Greatness

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.