Natural Choice Pet Foods Vet Care+ Grainfree Skin & Coat Care

Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label

Vet Care+ Grainfree Skin & Coat Care
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Natural Choice Pet Foods Vet Care+ Grainfree Skin & Coat Care a good dog food?

We score it 66/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with hydrolyzed salmon, potatoes and sweet potatoes as the main ingredients.

How we score

41% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 64% of the dry matter (55% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Single named animal protein: fish.

Why you might not

  • No analytical breakdown is published.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: fish
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feeding

Typical analysis (as fed)

No analysis recorded yet.

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

1–5kg: 25–90g, 5–10kg: 90–145g, 10–20kg: 145–245g, 20–30kg: 245–335g, 30–40kg: 335–415g, 40kg+: 415g+

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (12)41% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 55.5%
  • carb 16.7%
  • supplement 12.3%
  • fibre 7.2%
  • veg 5.1%
  • oil 3.2%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Freshly prepared hydrolysed salmon (35%)Hydrolyzed Salmonmeat · good3535.0
2PotatoPotatoescarb · medium-8.7
3Sweet potatoSweet Potatoescarb · good-8.0
4Hydrolysed dried white fish (14%)White Fishmeat · good1414.0
5Salmon oil (4%)Salmon Oiloil · good44.0
6Beet pulpBeet Pulpfibre · medium-7.2
7Soya oil (3%)Soybean oiloil · medium33.0
8Hydrolysed salmon gravy (2.5%)Salmonmeat · good2.52.5
9MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-6.5
10Dried algae (schizochytrium sp.)Schizochytrium Algaesupplement · good-5.8
11Borage oil (0.2%)Borage oiloil · good0.20.2
12Marigold (source of lutein)Calendulaveg · good-5.1
  1. 1. Freshly prepared hydrolysed salmon (35%)35% declared35.0% estimated
    Hydrolyzed Salmon · meat · good
  2. 2. Potato8.7% estimated
    Potatoes · carb · medium
  3. 3. Sweet potato8.0% estimated
    Sweet Potatoes · carb · good
  4. 4. Hydrolysed dried white fish (14%)14% declared14.0% estimated
    White Fish · meat · good
  5. 5. Salmon oil (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
    Salmon Oil · oil · good
  6. 6. Beet pulp7.2% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  7. 7. Soya oil (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
    Soybean oil · oil · medium
  8. 8. Hydrolysed salmon gravy (2.5%)2.5% declared2.5% estimated
    Salmon · meat · good
  9. 9. Minerals6.5% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  10. 10. Dried algae (schizochytrium sp.)5.8% estimated
    Schizochytrium Algae · supplement · good
  11. 11. Borage oil (0.2%)0.2% declared0.2% estimated
    Borage oil · oil · good
  12. 12. Marigold (source of lutein)5.1% estimated
    Calendula · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-07

Brand and contact: Natural Choice Pet Foods

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-07
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall score of 66 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.4 points and the meat content contributed +6.2 points. However, the processing format adjusted the score by -6.7 and ingredients without printed percentages contributed -4.4 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.41
Meat share of dry matter64.1%0.096+6.16
Carb share of dry matter5.8%-0.115-0.66
Oil share of dry matter4.4%-0.092-0.40
Vegetable share of dry matter1.1%-0.005-0.01
Supplement share of dry matter15.7%-0.012-0.19
Undeclared quantities41.3%-0.106-4.36
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.41
Meat share of dry matter64.1%0.096+6.16
Carb share of dry matter5.8%-0.115-0.66
Oil share of dry matter4.4%-0.092-0.40
Vegetable share of dry matter1.1%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter15.7%-0.012-0.19
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities41.3%-0.106-4.36
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Subtotal
66.0
Final score
66/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v366/100current
v266/100
v165/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Analytical constituents not declared

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (58.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)11.7/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✗ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) - not on file0/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "formulated without grain" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Skin growth & repair (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Skin nourishment and elasticity (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Anti inflammatory (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Dermal care and coat health (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
formulated without grain (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Hypoallergenic (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Vet Care+ Grainfree Skin & Coat Care

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Natural Choice Pet Foods

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.