More Heart Support Organ Rich Turkey Wet

Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label

Heart Support Organ Rich Turkey Wet
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is More Heart Support Organ Rich Turkey Wet a good dog food?

We score it 80/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete wet paté food for dogs of all life stages, with heart, turkey and turkey liver as the main ingredients.

How we score

Why you might choose it

  • Scores 80, in the top quarter of wet foods we track.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 78% of the dry matter (62% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.

Why you might not

  • High in fat: 27% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: turkey
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • You are limiting fat: 27.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 10.20% · Fat 5.40%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein10.20%
Fat5.40%
Fibre0.50%
Ash2.50%
Moisture80%
Phosphorus0.18%

Energy: 91.64 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Please store in a cool dry place. Once opened, keep in an airtight container.

Feeding guide

Dog Weight (kg) / Cans per day: 0-10 / 0.5-1; 10-20 / 1-2; 20-30 / 2-2.5; 30-45 / 2.5-3.5; 45+ / 3.5+. Split between morning and afternoon meal. Introduce gradually over 7 days. Fresh drinking water should be provided at all times.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin D3 (3a671) 200 IU/kg; Zinc as zinc sulfate monohydrate (3b605) 25 mg/kg; Manganese as manganous sulphate monohydrate (3b503) 1.4 mg/kg; Iodine as Calcium Iodate Anhydrous (3b202) 0.75 mg/kg; Copper as Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (3b405) 0.5 mg/kg

Technological additives

gelling agent.

Ingredients (16)3% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 61.9%
  • other 25.8%
  • veg 7.6%
  • carb 3.1%
  • supplement 1.1%
  • oil 0.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
118.33% composed of Turkey HeartsHeartmeat · good18.3318.3
218.33% Turkey MeatTurkeymeat · medium18.3318.3
35% Turkey LiverTurkey livermeat · good55.0
418.33% Turkey NeckNeckmeat · medium18.3318.3
5Turkey Broth (25%)Cooking brothother · medium2525.0
6Potato (3%)Potatoescarb · medium33.0
7Carrots (3%)Carrotsveg · good33.0
8Pumpkin (2%)Pumpkinveg · good22.0
9Kale (2%)Kaleveg · good22.0
10Minerals (1%)Vitamins and mineralssupplement · medium11.0
11Linseed Oil (0.5%)Linseed oiloil · good0.50.5
12Cranberries (0.1%)Cranberriesveg · good0.10.1
13Parsley (0.1%)Parsleyveg · good0.10.1
14Dandelion (0.1%)Dandelion Rootveg · good0.10.1
15Yeast (0.1%)Yeastsupplement · good0.10.1
16Spirulina (0.1%)Spirulinaveg · good0.10.1
  1. 1. 18.33% composed of Turkey Hearts18.33% declared18.3% estimated
    Heart · meat · good
  2. 2. 18.33% Turkey Meat18.33% declared18.3% estimated
    Turkey · meat · medium
  3. 3. 5% Turkey Liver5% declared5.0% estimated
    Turkey liver · meat · good
  4. 4. 18.33% Turkey Neck18.33% declared18.3% estimated
    Neck · meat · medium
  5. 5. Turkey Broth (25%)25% declared25.0% estimated
    Cooking broth · other · medium
  6. 6. Potato (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
    Potatoes · carb · medium
  7. 7. Carrots (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  8. 8. Pumpkin (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
    Pumpkin · veg · good
  9. 9. Kale (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
    Kale · veg · good
  10. 10. Minerals (1%)1% declared1.0% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  11. 11. Linseed Oil (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
    Linseed oil · oil · good
  12. 12. Cranberries (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Cranberries · veg · good
  13. 13. Parsley (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Parsley · veg · good
  14. 14. Dandelion (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Dandelion Root · veg · good
  15. 15. Yeast (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Yeast · supplement · good
  16. 16. Spirulina (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Spirulina · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-10-06

Brand and contact: More

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-10-06
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
morepetfoods.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The recipe scores 80 out of 100. The meat content contributed +7.5 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.3 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points, and the remaining ingredients deducted -2.2 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.26
Meat share of dry matter78.2%0.096+7.50
Carb share of dry matter3.5%-0.115-0.40
Oil share of dry matter2.3%-0.092-0.21
Vegetable share of dry matter5.5%-0.005-0.03
Supplement share of dry matter4.7%-0.012-0.06
Other share of dry matter5.8%-0.375-2.18
Undeclared quantities3.0%-0.106-0.32
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.26
Meat share of dry matter78.2%0.096+7.50
Carb share of dry matter3.5%-0.115-0.40
Oil share of dry matter2.3%-0.092-0.21
Vegetable share of dry matter5.5%-0.005-0.03
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter4.7%-0.012-0.06
Other share of dry matter5.8%-0.375-2.18
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities3.0%-0.106-0.32
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
79.5
Final score
80/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v380/100current
v282/100
v181/100
v1.983/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein10.251 (band 20.619 to 40%)100
Fat5.427 (band 6.30025 to 20%)100
Fibre0.52.5 (band 0.5 to 5%)96.7
Phosphorus0.180.9 (band 0.4582 to 1.6%)93.2
Energy (kcal/100g)91.64458.2100

Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 5 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin D3 (3a671) 200 IU/kg
  • Zinc as zinc sulfate monohydrate (3b605) 25 mg/kg
  • Manganese as manganous sulphate monohydrate (3b503) 1.4 mg/kg
  • Iodine as Calcium Iodate Anhydrous (3b202) 0.75 mg/kg
  • Copper as Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (3b405) 0.5 mg/kg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (97% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)19.4/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "grain-free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "rich in high-quality meat and free from wheat and gluten" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
grain-free (on pack)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Developed with veterinary professionals (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
supports heart and circulatory health (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
rich in taurine for heart development (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
iron rich turkey liver for overall circulatory health (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
healthy dose of antioxidants from cranberry, parsley and dandelion (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
high levels of Omega 3 fatty acids (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion
added salmon oil, chicken fat and linseed for a boost of omega-3 and omega-6 (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
rich in high-quality meat and free from wheat and gluten (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Heart Support Organ Rich Turkey Wet

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from More

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.