Lukullus Junior Turkey Hearts & Lamb
Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Lukullus Junior Turkey Hearts & Lamb a good dog food?
We score it 79/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Declared analysis sits below the FEDIAF minimum for phosphorus.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey heart
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb heart
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists millet
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 27.2% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 10.50% · Fat 6.80%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 10.50% |
| Fat | 6.80% |
| Fibre | 0.30% |
| Ash | 2% |
| Moisture | 75% |
| Calcium | 0.30% |
| Phosphorus | 0.20% |
Energy: 115 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool place after opening.
Feeding guide
Every dog is different; amounts are guidelines only. Adult weight up to 5kg: 200-400g (up to 3m), 400g (4-6m), 400g (7-18m). 6-15kg: 400-800g / 400-1000g / 400-800g. 16-30kg: 800-1200g / 800-1600g / 800-1200g.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin D3 200 IU/kg; Biotin 300 mcg/kg; Zinc (as zinc sulphate monohydrate) 15 mg/kg; Manganese (as manganese II sulphate monohydrate) 3 mg/kg; Iodine (as calcium iodate, anhydrous) 0.75 mg/kg
Ingredients (10)0% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 66.0%
- other 26.5%
- veg 3.0%
- carb 3.0%
- supplement 1.0%
- oil 0.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.33% heart | Lamb Heart | meat · good | 15.33 | 15.3 |
| 2 | 15.33% meat | Lamb | meat · medium | 15.33 | 15.3 |
| 3 | 5% liver | Lambs Liver | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 4 | 15.33% tripe | Lamb Tripe | meat · medium | 15.33 | 15.3 |
| 5 | 26.5% Meat Stock | Cooking broth | other · medium | 26.5 | 26.5 |
| 6 | 15% Turkey Heart | Turkey Heart | meat · good | 15 | 15.0 |
| 7 | 3% Millet | Millet | carb · good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 8 | 3% Apple | Apples | veg · good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 9 | 1% Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 1 | 1.0 |
| 10 | 0.5% Safflower Oil | Safflower Oil | oil · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
- 1. 15.33% heart15.33% declared15.3% estimated
- 2. 15.33% meat15.33% declared15.3% estimated
- 3. 5% liver5% declared5.0% estimated
- 4. 15.33% tripe15.33% declared15.3% estimated
- 5. 26.5% Meat Stock26.5% declared26.5% estimated
- 6. 15% Turkey Heart15% declared15.0% estimated
- 7. 3% Millet3% declared3.0% estimated
- 8. 3% Apple3% declared3.0% estimated
- 9. 1% Minerals1% declared1.0% estimated
- 10. 0.5% Safflower Oil0.5% declared0.5% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Lukullus
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.zooplus.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
26 reviews on this product · 4.3/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The recipe scores 79 out of 100. The meat content contributed +7.3 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.9 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points, and the remaining ingredients deducted -2 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +6.93 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 76.0% | 0.096 | +7.30 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.9% | -0.115 | -1.25 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.0% | -0.092 | -0.19 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 3.8% | -0.012 | -0.05 |
| Other share of dry matter | 5.5% | -0.375 | -2.04 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +6.93 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 76.0% | 0.096 | +7.30 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.9% | -0.115 | -1.25 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.0% | -0.092 | -0.19 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 3.8% | -0.012 | -0.05 |
| Other share of dry matter | 5.5% | -0.375 | -2.04 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | -0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 78.6
- Final score
- 79/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10.5 | 42 | 100 |
| Fat | 6.8 | 27.2 | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.3 | 1.2 | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.2 | 0.8 | 54.1 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 115 | 460 | 100 |
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 5 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin D3 200 IU/kg
- Biotin 300 mcg/kg
- Zinc (as zinc sulphate monohydrate) 15 mg/kg
- Manganese (as manganese II sulphate monohydrate) 3 mg/kg
- Iodine (as calcium iodate, anhydrous) 0.75 mg/kg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "High in protein" — supported by the declared high protein data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| With extra calcium for healthy growth (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains omega 3 and omega 6 fatty acids (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| More than 65 % meat (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Specifically formulated to meet the needs of puppies and young dogs (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ensures bones and teeth develop properly (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High in protein (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| No artificial additives such as taste enhancers, artificial colour or preservatives (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Junior Turkey Hearts & Lamb
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.